War

...now browsing by tag

 
 

Iran acts to expand sensitive nuclear capacity: diplomats

Tuesday, May 21st, 2013

By Fredrik Dahl

VIENNA | Tue May 21, 2013 10:40am EDT

EDITORS' NOTE: Reuters and other foreign media are subject to Iranian restrictions on their ability to film or take pictures in Tehran. Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad waits before an official meeting with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Mohamed ElBaradei in Tehran October 4, 2009. REUTERS/Raheb Homavandi

(Reuters) – A U.N. nuclear agency report due this week is expected to show Iran further increasing its capacity to produce material that its adversaries fear could eventually be put to developing atomic bombs, Western diplomats said on Tuesday.

But they said it is also likely to indicate that growth in Iran’s most sensitive nuclear stockpile has been held back because some of it has been used for reactor fuel, potentially providing more time for diplomacy between Iran and major powers.

Tehran’s holding of medium-enriched uranium gas is closely watched in the West as Israel – which has threatened air strikes if diplomacy and sanctions do not stop Iran’s atomic drive – says it must not amass enough for one bomb if further processed.

Critics say Iran is trying to achieve the capability to make atomic arms. Iran denies this, saying it needs nuclear power for energy generation and medical purposes and that it is Israel’s reputed nuclear arsenal that threatens regional peace.

The next quarterly report on Iran’s nuclear program by the U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), expected on Wednesday, is likely to show continued installation of the centrifuges used for enriching uranium, diplomats said.

That would include an advanced model known as IR-2m which, once operational, would enable Iran to speed up sharply its accumulation of refined uranium, which can have both civilian and military purposes.

The number of IR-2m centrifuges and empty centrifuge casings that have been put in place at Iran’s main enrichment site near the town of Natanz is expected to have risen significantly since February, when it stood at 180, they said.

Iran has for years been trying to develop centrifuges more efficient than the erratic 1970s-vintage IR-1 machines it now uses, but introducing new models has been dogged by technical hurdles and difficulty in obtaining key parts abroad.

“We expect that they’ve continued to install more advanced centrifuges at Natanz,” one diplomat said.

Another Western envoy said Iran was also believed to be pressing ahead in the construction of a research reactor, which experts say could offer it a second way of producing material for a nuclear bomb, if it decided to embark on such a course.

Nuclear analysts say the type of reactor that Iran is building near the town of Arak could yield plutonium for nuclear arms if the spent fuel is reprocessed, something Iran has said it has no intention of doing.

NUCLEAR STOCKPILE

Diplomats will also scrutinise the IAEA report for what it has to say about Iran’s possession of medium-enriched uranium as this represents a technical threshold relatively close to the level required for nuclear bombs.

Since Iran in 2010 began processing uranium to a fissile concentration of 20 percent it has produced more than the 240-250 kg that would be needed for one bomb, if refined more.

But while the stockpile has expanded, Iran has still kept it below Israel’s stated “red line” by converting a large part of the uranium gas into oxide powder in order, Tehran says, to yield fuel for a medical research reactor in the capital.

As a result, the increase in the holding of 20 percent gas has been less than the production. In February, the stockpile was 167 kg, a rise of roughly 18-19 kg since the previous report in December but a significant slowdown from a 50 percent jump in the previous three-month period.

“It seems that they are converting nearly all the material that they are producing,” a Western official said.

But while the uranium conversion activity may postpone any decision by Israel on whether to strike Iranian nuclear sites, Western diplomats made clear Tehran must do much more in order to allay suspicions about its atomic program.

Turning uranium gas into oxide powder in order to make fuel plates may also be just a temporary positive development because the process is possible to reverse, Western experts say.

The six world powers involved in diplomacy with Iran – the United States, Russia, France, Britain, Germany and China - want it to stop refining uranium to 20 percent and suspend work at the underground Fordow site where most of this work is pursued.

(For an interactive timeline on Iran’s nuclear program, click on link.reuters.com/gad76r )

(Editing by Mark Heinrich)

Report: US Apologized to Israel for Leak

Monday, May 20th, 2013

The United States has apologized for leaking information about Israel’s alleged attack in Syria several weeks ago.

Israelnationalnews.com

By David Lev

First Publish: 5/20/2013, 10:27 PM

Syria border

Syria border
Israel news photo: Flash 90

The United States has apologized for leaking information about Israel’s alleged attack on a convoy of weapons in Syria bound for Hizbullah terrorists several weeks ago. According to reports that appeared in the Jerusalem Post over the weekend, the “leak” about the U.S. leak came from an Israel Radio correspondent, who listed details of the leak, and the apology.

The tweet came from Israel Radio’s diplomatic correspondent Chico Menashe. In his tweet, Menashe wrote “The U.S. has apologized to Israel for leaking details of the attack in Syria. Senior administration officials said to their [Israeli] counterparts that they are examining the issue and that low-level [officials] were responsible for the leak.”

In addition, Menashe tweeted, “US officials told that they [will] review the matter. The leak forced Assad to react harshly.”

According to Pentagon sources, the tweets by Menashe were true, and the U.S. has apologized to Israel for the leak, which could have put Israeli lives in danger. The sources said that the Pentagon was investigating the matter. Israel has still not confirmed that it was involved in the attack.

Hezbollah preparing to attack Israel, commander says

Monday, May 20th, 2013

Terror group reportedly now has sophisticated Russian weapons

hezbollah

05/19/2013

WND

By: REZA KAHLILI

Hezbollah is in the final stage of preparation to attack Israel with sophisticated weapons, according to a high-level commander of the terrorist group.

Tabnak, an outlet of Iran’s Islamic regime, said an unidentified Hezbollah commander, in an interview with the Kuwaiti paper Alrai, thanked Syrian President Bashar Assad for keeping his promise to provide those weapons to Hezbollah.

“The weapons given to Hezbollah will change the balance of power,” he said.

“We have in recent days done extensive operations for reconnaissance on Israel’s central and sensitive military and infrastructural installations in different areas and also on Israel’s commando posts and peacekeeping forces in the Golan Heights,” he said, “to prepare for the coming battle with the occupying regime.”

The commander revealed some of the weapons given by Syria to Hezbollah, including Pantsir (SA-22 Greyhound) surface-to-air missiles, SAM 5 surface-to-air missiles and the Russian anti-tank Kornet missiles. However, the commander also hinted that soon Hezbollah will receive the advanced and dreaded ship-killer Yakhont missiles from Assad.

U.S. officials, British Prime Minister David Cameron and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had urged Russian President Vladimir Putin not to go ahead with his arms sales to Syria, including the S-300 antiaircraft system and the feared Yakhont cruise missiles. But despite their pleas, Russian officials said they were honoring contracts with Syria, and those weapons Russia will send to Syria may eventually wind up in the hands of Hezbollah and Iran.

The Hezbollah commander also said that Assad has ordered formation of resistance forces similar to Hezbollah, arming them with various weapons, for the confrontation with Israel.

HELP US FIGHT TERROR WITH TRUTH! FUND FOR INVESTIGATIVE NATIONAL SECURITY REPORTING

On May 9, days after Israeli warplanes struck shipments of advanced Iranian weapons on the outskirts of Damascus intended for Hezbollah, the terrorist group’s leader, Hassan Nasrallah, boasted that Syria will supply “game-changing” weapons to Hezbollah.

“The attack carried out by the Zionist regime (in Syria) will shorten this fake regime’s life,” Iranian Defense Minister Gen. Ahmad Vahidi warned Israel after the Israeli attack.

Meanwhile, the British Sunday Times reported Sunday that Syria has begun deploying advanced surface-to-surface missiles aimed at Tel Aviv to be launched if Israeli warplanes strike inside Syria again.

According to a source within the Iranian intelligence apparatus, there is now little hope the Assad regime can be saved, hence the panic by Russia in arming Assad with further sophisticated weapons in a warning to U.S. and NATO to stay out of the conflict. He said Iran’s rapid shipment of sophisticated weapons to Hezbollah is part of that strategy. By reinforcing its arsenal, Hezbollah can strike all of Israel and, as a last resort, engage Israel from within Syria, further complicating the already-chaotic region.

Israel, worried about the disintegration of Syria and the further arming of Hezbollah, has warned continuously that giving “game-changing” weapons to Hezbollah is its red line.

Despite the open Iranian threats against Israel, the source said, regime officials have no intention of engaging the Jewish state directly unless America launches a direct attack against Syria or if there is an attack on Iran. In fact, he said, Iranian officials are worried about Israel attacking their nuclear facilities as Iran seeks to create a nuclear-armed state that would then become untouchable.

However, Iranians have devised several plans to engage Israel through their forces in Syria and their proxies, such as Hezbollah, to draw the Jewish state into a wider conflict should Israel continue to attack Syrian armaments facilities.

The source added that the regime also has devised plans for terrorist attacks against Israel, the U.S. homeland and their interests around the world as a warning to leave Syria alone and to stop the pressure on the Islamic regime because of its illicit nuclear program. The fall of Assad, they think, would be a culmination of an effort to then target the clerical regime in Iran.

As reported exclusively on WND on May 13, Iran not only has formed a new coalition of terrorist masterminds among its Quds Forces, Hezbollah and al-Qaida to attack the U.S. homeland, but has also given the go-ahead for three imminent operations within the U.S. to change the perception of security in America, which it believes has helped empower America’s actions in the Middle East.

Reza Kahlili is a pseudonym for a former CIA operative in Iran’s Revolutionary Guards and author of the award winning book “A Time to Betray” (Simon & Schuster, 2010). He serves on the Task Force on National and Homeland Security and the advisory board of the Foundation for Democracy in Iran (FDI).

 

Syria gunfire hits Israel-occupied Golan ‘near military patrol’

Monday, May 20th, 2013

Monday, 20 May 2013

Al Arabiya with AFP -

Israeli soldiers of the Golani brigade prepare during a military exercise May 7, 2013 near the border with Syria, in the Israeli-annexed Golan Heights. (AFP File Photo)

Overnight gunfire from Syria hit the central Israeli-occupied Golan Heights near an Israeli military patrol, an Al Arabiya correspondent reported on Monday.

An Israeli military spokeswoman confirmed that shots were fired, but it was not clear whether the gunfire was intentional.

The shots were “most likely were stray bullets, we don’t know if it was intentional,” the spokeswoman told AFP news agency, adding that the Israeli army had not fired back and that Israel had submitted a complaint to the United Nations force in the region.

Israel seized 1,200 square kilometers (460 square miles) of the strategic Golan Heights during the 1967 Six-Day War, which it later annexed, a move never recognized by the international community.

The Golan Heights have been tense since the beginning of the conflict in Syria more than two years ago.

However, there have been only minor flare-ups in the region to date, with Syrian shells crashing in the occupied Golan and Israel firing in retaliation.

In recent weeks there were four incidents of fire coming from Syria and straying across the ceasefire line.

Last week projectiles from Syria hit Mount Hermon, causing the popular site on the Israeli-occupied Golan to close down for visitors.

Syrian-Hizballah’s capture of Qusayr opens direct weapons route to Lebanon

Sunday, May 19th, 2013

DEBKAfile Special Report May 19, 2013

Syrian forces seize al-Qusayr

Syrian forces seize al-Qusayr

Shortly after Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu pledged Sunday, May 19, to maintain Israeli operations in Syria against the passage of advanced Iranian weapons to the Lebanese Hizballah, Syrian troops and their Hizballah comrades stormed Al-Qasayr, the northwestern town which commands the high road from Syrian Homs to Lebanon’s Hermel Mountains.

This was a major victory: Iranian arms for Hizballah can now go through from Syria to destination unobstructed.
In more than two years of battling the Assad regime, this was one of the rebels’ most devastating losses after three weeks of bitter fighting and the last of a whole row of recent setbacks.

Bashar Assad in contrast has gained huge advantages from his al Qusayr victory, as DEBKAfile’s military sources report:

1. It cuts off the Syrian rebels’ main supply and communications route via Lebanon through which their Arab backers Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE to send them fighters, arms and funds.

2.  Rebel positions in the nearby town of Homs become increasingly vulnerable, as the Syrian army regains control of the main highway links between Damascus, Homs and Aleppo.

3.  After the rebels were pushed out of Al-Qasayr, Turkey remains their only accessible source of supplies.
However, Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan has made a sudden U-turn. He had promised publicly to lobby for no-fly zones in his meeting with President Barack Obama at the White House Friday, May 17, to shield rebel forces in different parts of the country from Syrian air strikes. Instead, Edrogan threw his support between the international conference sponsored by Washington and Moscow for resolving the Syrian conflict.

This told the rebels that the supportive Turkish channel was closing down.
It is obvious to them that the conference can only succeed if Washington comes over to the Russian-Iranian-Hizballah side and agrees to the perpetuation of the Assad party’s role in any future government.

As yet, neither of the contestants has agreed to attend the conference for which no date has been set. However, Turkish backing and arms supplies through its territory are expected to shrink progressively to squeeze the rebels into accepting a formula which would be tantamount to bowing to the defeat of their uprising.

4. For Israel, the fall of al Qusayr means that while rebel supply routes are shut down, supply routes open up for the free movement of Iranian weapons from Syria straight to HIzballah strongholds in Lebanon. This would be Hizballah’s reward for its military aid to Assad’s army.

If Prime Minister Netanyahu was serious about his promise Sunday to cut off Hizballah’s weapon routes from Syria, he has three primary options to choose from – none of them easy, to say the least.

a)  Military intervention in al Qusayr before the Syrian army and Hizballah clinch their takeover of this strategic byway town. This would catapult Israel into full-blown war with Syria and Hizballah and is therefore a non-starter.

b)  Bombardment of the convoys carrying arms from Syria to Lebanon.
This won’t do much good. Having learned its lesson from the three Israeli air strikes against arms convoys and depots this year, Syria has now transferred the hardware disassembled into component parts and passed them out among smuggling rings ato move them under cover of dark into Lebanon.

c)  Attacks on the destination of those weapons – Hizballah depots in the Hermel – after their delivery. This would almost certainly trigger Hizballah war action against Israel.

Israel acts to deny Hezbollah of Syrian arms, says Netanyahu

Sunday, May 19th, 2013

Netanyahu said the Middle East was going through its most sensitive period for decades, with the conflict in Syria at the centre of the turmoil. (Reuters)

AFP

Israel is “acting” to prevent Syrian weapons reaching Lebanon’s Hezbollah and will continue to do so, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday.

His remarks came two weeks after Israel carried out air strikes near Damascus, which a senior Israeli source said were aimed at preventing the transfer of sophisticated Iranian arms to Hezbollah, the Lebanese Shiite ally of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

Netanyahu said the Middle East was going through its most sensitive period for decades, with the conflict in Syria at the centre of the turmoil.

“We are closely following developments and changes there, and we are prepared for any scenario,” he said at the start of the weekly cabinet meeting.

“The government of Israel is acting in a responsible, determined and prudent manner to ensure the supreme interest of the State of Israel which is the security of its citizens according to the policy we set: to prevent as far as possible leakage of advanced weapons to Hezbollah and terrorist elements,” he said.

“We will ensure the security interests of the citizens of Israel in the future.”

Israel has repeatedly warned that it would not permit the transfer of advanced weapons or chemical agents to Hezbollah or to any other militant groups.

On January 30, another strike on Syrian soil, which also was attributed to Israel by regional sources, destroyed what military intelligence officials say was a shipment of Russian-made SA-17 anti-aircraft missiles destined for Hezbollah.

France: West should sanction Iran ‘decisively’

Saturday, May 18th, 2013

By JPOST.COM STAFF

05/18/2013 01:48

French defense minister says increased pressure is justified; calls to defeat Iran’s stalling tactics in IAEA talks.

Iran president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

Iran president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Photo: Reuters

Iran’s inflexible stance on curbing its nuclear program should lead the US and European nations to implement “decisive sanctions” against the Islamic Republic in the coming months, AFP cited French Defense Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian as saying on Friday.

According to Le Drian, the Western nations should pressure the advancement “in quantity and quality” of Iran’s uranium enrichment program through sanctions and dialogue.

In regards to accusations of Tehran’s use of stalling tactics at the IAEA talks, aimed to resume an investigation into suspected atomic bomb research, and parallel negotiations with world powers, Le Drian said that “[more] than ever we have a responsibility to defeat this strategy of procrastination and concealment to ensure nuclear non-proliferation.”

“This responsibility justifies the strong commitment of ours, alongside our American allies and European partners, for the implementation of decisive sanctions,” he added during a talk at a Washington think tank.

Diplomatic efforts to resolve a dispute over Iran’s nuclear program, which Tehran says is peaceful but the West suspects is intended to give Iran the capability to build a nuclear bomb, have been all but deadlocked for years, while Iran has continued to announce advances in the program.

The United Nations‘ nuclear agency failed to persuade Iran on Wednesday to let it resume an investigation into suspected atomic bomb research, leaving the high-stakes diplomacy stymied.

On Thursday, Saeed Jalili, Iran’s chief negotiator said Tehran is prepared to pursue nuclear diplomacy with world powers before or after next month’s presidential election.

Negotiations between Iran and the six powers – Russia, China, the United States, Britain, France and Germany – have been deadlocked since a meeting last June.

Any movement in the decade-old standoff will now probably have to wait until after Iranians vote on June 14 for a successor to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Jalili reiterated that Iran would never abandon its right to enrich uranium. Major powers want Tehran to suspend its enrichment activities to reassure the world that it is not seeking nuclear weapons. Iran denies having any such goal.

France spelled out on Friday that it would oppose a peace conference for Syria if Bashar Assad’s regional ally Iran is invited, clouding the prospect for a US-Russian initiative to end the two-year-old war.

No date has yet been agreed for the international meeting, which appears to face growing obstacles

France has hoped the Syrian conflict could be resolved through political means, though without inclusion of the Assad family, AFP cited Le Drian as saying.

Reuters contributed to this report.

European nations urged to boycott U.N. disarmament body chaired by Iran

Friday, May 17th, 2013

JTA.Org

May 17, 2013 6:42am

THE HAGUE (JTA) — A Dutch group monitoring rights in Iran urged the Netherlands and other European nations to join the United States and Canada in boycotting a U.N. forum on disarmament that will be chaired by Tehran.

Iran’s chairmanship of the U.N. Conference on Disarmament “comes at the expense of the United Nations’ credibility as a body meant to safeguard global safety,” the Hague-based Iran Comite wrote to Dutch Foreign Minister Frans Timmermans on Thursday.

Hillel Neuer of the Geneva-based nonprofit UN Watch also called on France, Germany and Britain to boycott the forum. He said Iran’s chairmanship “is like putting Jack the Ripper in charge of a women’s shelter.”

A meeting in New York in April was meant to breathe new life into the the Conference on Disarmament, established in 1979 but inactive for the past 15 years. However, the fresh start was mired in controversy when it emerged that Iran will become the conference’s chairman through what U.N. officials called an automatic rotation system among the forum’s 65 member states.

Earlier this week, the United States and Canada said they would boycott the body for the duration of the five-week chairmanship of Iran, which begins May 27.

“The Dutch government should boycott the Conference on Disarmament for as long as Iran heads it and should urge other countries to do the same,” read the letter by the Iran Comite, a watchdog group made up of former Dutch politicians, Kurds, Iranian opposition figures, gay rights activists and Jews.

Who Will Fix Ahmadinejad’s Disastrous Foreign Policy?

Friday, May 17th, 2013

Asharq

Written by : Alex Vatanka
on : Friday, 17 May, 2013

Iran’s next president would do well to return to pragmatism in foreign affairs

SAFFRON blog: A highly prized spice native to Iran, historically used in ancient Persia to medicate, dye, weave and beautify. Today, it gives Iranian cuisine its distinctive yellow pigment. Saffron flavors the discussion of all things Iranian.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, right, and his close ally Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei, flash victory signs at the start of their press conference, after registering candidacy of Rahim Mashaei for the upcoming presidential election, at the election headquarters of the interior ministry, in Tehran, Iran, Saturday, May 11, 2013. (AP Photo/Ebrahim Noroozi)

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, right, and his close ally Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei, flash victory signs at the start of their press conference, after registering candidacy of Rahim Mashaei for the upcoming presidential election, at the election headquarters of the interior ministry, in Tehran, Iran, Saturday, May 11, 2013. (AP Photo/Ebrahim Noroozi)

On June 14, Iran will hold its long-awaited presidential elections. The vast majority of the 686 individuals who have registered to contest the elections will not appear on the ballot. The Guardian Council—Iran’s unelected 12-man vetting agency that determines who can run for any political office in the country—is likely to reject all but a very small number of the aspirants. The list of those cleared to run will be made available by the Council on May 18. In the last Iranian presidential election, held in June 2009, only four candidates were approved out of 476 that registered to run. 

The Guardian Council aside, among those likely to be allowed to run there is still a considerable diversity in terms of the backgrounds of the candidates and the political camps and views they represent.

All the candidates in Tehran, however, appear to see eye-to-eye one point: they all agree that outgoing president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was an unequivocal disaster for Iranian foreign policy and the country’s diplomatic standing in the world.

The maverick two-term president is blamed for having exacerbated Tehran’s foreign challenges by generating unnecessary tension with the West through his bombastic style—and not doing nearly enough to mollify Iran’s immediate neighbors amid widespread fear of its regional ambitions.

Even those not running in the elections are having a field day in attacking Ahmadinejad’s foreign policy record. Mehdi Sanaei, a member of the Iranian parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, commented that the Ahmadinejad government had not pursued the basic “cost and benefit” rule which is part and parcel of diplomacy. In Sanaei’s view, and undoubtedly many others in Tehran, Iran “has paid dearly” for mistakes made in recent years in the realm of foreign policy.

In recent weeks, a host of high-profile foreign policy decisions have come under increasing scrutiny. Ahmadinejad’s trademark Holocaust-denial stance is a favored topic of criticism. Mohsen Rezaei, a rightist senior regime figure who also ran against Ahmadinejad in 2009, stated recently that if he became president he would not “speak about the Holocaust.”

Another front runner, Mohammad Qalibaf, asked, “What good did Iran get out of [Ahmadinejad] denying the Holocaust?”

Meanwhile, another prominent candidate, Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, a former president and now a darling of the reformists, raised the ante by making comments that essentially questioned the logic behind Tehran’s long-standing enmity toward Israel: “If the Arabs end up in a war with Israel, Iran can provide material support to the Arabs,” but added that there was little else it could do.

This sort of narrative—and the argument that Iran is in dire need for a foreign policy overhaul—is now being debated more openly in the Iranian media. Once the official election campaign begins, more surprising policy positions can be expected from the competing candidates.

The candidates who represent the broader reformist movement—and here Hashemi Rafsanjani and Hassan Rouhani stand out—have a more compelling case to take to the voters. During the years of the reformist administration of President Mohammad Khatami, a coherent, rational approach to foreign policy was more discernible. It stressed the need for detente, and specifically reaching out to neighboring states. This was the period when the Iran–Saudi relationship was the most tranquil, and when Khatami’s call for a “Dialogue Among Civilizations” brought Tehran and Washington closest to an accord. The same sorts of inclinations were also in place when Rafsanjani was president from 1989 to 1997, although his administration’s record was more mixed.

On the other hand, the Ahmadinejad administration of 2005 to 2013 has had a foreign policy record that is in many ways incoherent. Instead, it has been heavy on slogans and grand—but almost always unrealistic—gestures. A focus on securing and promoting Iran’s specific national interests has been missing. Whichever candidate survives the scrutiny of the Guardian Council would do well to promise the electorate a return to pragmatism in foreign policy, one rooted in a clear-eyed recognition of Tehran’s multiple foreign policy challenges in its neighborhood and on the international stage.

Alex Vatanka

Alex Vatanka

Alex Vatanka is an adjunct scholar at the Middle East Institute in Washington, D.C. Born in Iran, he was the senior Middle East analyst at Jane’s Information Group from 2001 to 2010. He is also a senior fellow in Middle East Studies at the US Air Force Special Operations School (USAFSOS).

More Posts

IAEA: No Breakthrough in Iran Nuclear Talks

Thursday, May 16th, 2013

VOA

May 15, 2013

The United Nations’ top nuclear inspector, Herman Nackaerts, says talks with Iran have ended with no agreement and no date set for new talks.

This was the 10th round of talks since the beginning of last year between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency. U.N. inspectors want access to Iranian nuclear facilities and documents.

The IAEA is concerned Iran may be building a nuclear weapon and wants to visit such places as the Parchin military site.

Iran says Parchin is a standard military facility and insists its nuclear program is peaceful.

Iran’s top nuclear negotiator, Saeed Jalili, held separate talks in Istanbul Wednesday with EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton. Their talks are focused on the possibility of another round of negotiations between Iran and the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council plus Germany.

Those nations are pushing for Iran to stop some of its uranium enrichment activity, while Iran demands they recognize its right to enrich uranium.

The U.N. Security Council has passed multiple rounds of sanctions against Iran related to its nuclear program. The United States and other Western nations have enacted their own sanctions, including those targeting Iran’s key oil exports.

The U.S. Treasury Department Wednesday imposed sanctions on a trading company and an exchange house in the United Arab Emirates for dealing with a blacklisted Iranian bank. Treasury also announced it is banning gold sales to Iran starting July 1. The ban is part of the U.S. effort to weaken the Iranian currency and isolate Iran from the global financial system.

US senators urge Obama to up Iran sanctions

Thursday, May 16th, 2013

JPost

By BLOOMBERG

05/16/2013 02:01

Members of Congress call to impose greater economic pressure to curtail Iran’s nuclear ambitions, punish human-rights violations.

US Capitol building in Washington D.C.

US Capitol building in Washington D.C. Photo: REUTERS/Jim Bourg

Members of US Congress from both parties on Wednesday urged Obama administration officials to impose greater economic pressure to curtail Iran’s nuclear ambitions and punish its human-rights violations.

Senator Bob Menendez, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee and sponsor of several Iran sanctions laws, cited estimates that the global oil market has enough supply to let the US press Iran’s remaining oil buyers to radically curtail their purchases without causing a spike in gasoline prices.

“Oil markets are now and predicted to be loose for the coming year” and “it would seem that this is the time to press our allies to further reduce crude purchase from Iran,” Menendez, a New Jersey Democrat, told a committee hearing on preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.

The International Energy Agency said Tuesday that the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries’ spare crude oil production capacity will surge 25 percent in the next two years as rising US shale output crimps demand for OPEC’s supplies.

Crude production by non-OPEC countries will increase by 990,000 barrels a day annually to 2013, according to the Paris-based IEA. West Texas Intermediate crude for June delivery settled at $94.30 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange, the first advance in five days.

Menendez, who’s drafting legislation to tighten sanctions on Iran further, urged Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman and Treasury Undersecretary David Cohen to pressure the six remaining importers of Iranian oil, particularly China.

Additional sanctions

Existing sanctions punishing Iran for its suspected nuclear weapons program include curbs on financial transactions and crude oil exports, the country’s main source of revenue.

Sherman and Cohen testified that US President Barack Obama’s administration is looking at sanctions on additional sectors of Iran’s economy. The US is focused on Iranian “revenue, reserves and the rial,” Cohen said, referring to the Iranian currency.

Iran’s currency has depreciated by more than 50 percent over the past 12 months and the official inflation rate is 32 percent, Sherman told the panel. Unofficial estimates put the actual rate much higher.

The first US law targeting Iranian oil sales, which went into effect in mid-2012, coupled with a European Union oil embargo that went into force at the same time, cut Iran’s crude oil and condensate exports by 50 percent to about 1.3 million barrels a day by early this year, Cohen said. Iran’s petrochemical exports also have been hit, dropping by at least 7.6 percent in 2012, Cohen said.

Sanctions bite

Representative Ed Royce, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said at a hearing of his panel that sanctions must be tougher to make Iran stop development of nuclear technology.

In the Senate, Menendez expressed concern that Iran may be using its automotive industry to produce dual-use items for its nuclear program, and suggested the auto sector might be targeted for penalties, as well.

Menendez also questioned whether the administration is doing enough to enforce its own prohibitions on Iran’s gold trade issued last summer.

He cited estimates in a report released Tuesday by the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and Roubini Global Economics that Iran has imported more than $6 billion in gold, mainly from Turkey and the United Arab Emirates, since the administration’s ban on gold trade with Iran’s government took effect last summer — an amount equivalent to about 10 percent of Iran’s 2012 oil exports of $60 billion, Menendez said.

Gold ban

“We are actively enforcing” the gold ban, Cohen said. “We have been very clear with countries that are exporting gold to Iran, principally Turkey and the UAE, on precisely what the law permits and what it forbids and we are following the information very carefully.” Cohen reminded lawmakers that this July 1, the ban will extend to private sales, as well.

To date, though, the administration hasn’t penalized any entity in Turkey or the UAE for trading in gold with the Iranian government.

While Iranian officials say their country’s nuclear program is for energy and medical research, the US, its European allies and Israel say Iran may be trying to develop a nuclear weapons capability.

“We are about changing the behavior of the regime, not the regime,” Sherman told the Senate committee, while saying Obama wouldn’t hesitate to use force if that were the only way to stop Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.

The Treasury Wednesday identified two companies it said were linked to Iran’s efforts to evade international sanctions. Al Hilal Exchange and Al Fida International General Trading, both based in the United Arab Emirates, were designated for providing financial services to Iranian banks, the Treasury said in a statement today in Washington.

Syrian-Israeli war of words via Putin edges into Syrian-Hizballah war of attrition.

Thursday, May 16th, 2013

DEBKAfile Exclusive Report May 16, 2013, 10:58 AM (IDT)

USS Kearsarge which docked in Eilat

USS Kearsarge which docked in Eilat

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Prime Minister Netanyahu ended their three-hour meeting in Sochi Tuesday, May 14, at loggerheads on Syria. In fact, Putin warned his guest that Israel and its army, the IDF, were heading for war with Syria in which Russia might well be involved – and not just through the advanced S-300 anti-air missiles supplied to the Assad government. The case Netanyahu and Military Intelligence chief Maj. Gen. Aviv Kochavi put before Putin and Russian foreign intelligence chief, SVR Director Mikhail Fradkov, fell on deaf ears.

They found the Russian leader further infuriated by the docking that day at Israel’s Red Sea port of Eilat of the USS Kearsarge, carrying 1,800 marines and a consignment of 20 V-22 Osprey helicopters which US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel had promised to supply to Israel during his April visit.
Putin viewed the stationing of US forces in the Gulf of Aqaba just two hours away the Israeli-Syrian border for repelling Syrian-Iranian-Hizballah aggression against Israel or Jordan – signaled by the Kearsage’s arrival – as an act of bad faith by Washington. On the one hand, they want us to cooperate for an international conference to end the bloodshed in Syria, while on the other, they deploy military forces, he complained to Netanyahu.

The Israeli prime minister countered with a warning that Israel would continue to strike advanced weapons in Syria that were destined for Hizballah. And if President Bashar Assad hit back for Israel’s May 5 bombardment of weapons stores on Mount Qassioun near Damascus, Israel would intensify its bombardments of Syrian military targets and weapons until Assad was left to fight off rebel assaults empty-handed.
Putin rejected this threat as implausible.

Neither Putin nor Netanyahu put all their cards on the table, but the conversation ended with the Russian leader fully confident that his capabilities for safeguarding Assad were greater than Israel’s ability to destroy him.

In the end, Netanyahu and his party arrived home Tuesday evening with a bad feeling. They were certain that Moscow had given Assad the green light to go through with his threat to make the Syrian Golan and the Horan of southern Syria “a front for resistance” – i.e. the platforms for embarking on a war of attrition against northern Israel with the help of a flow of advanced weapons to Hizballah.
The Syrian ruler is strongly encouraged to adopt this path by Tehran. Hizballah’s leader Hassan Nasrallah has embraced it. And the radical Palestinian leader, Ahmed Jibril, head of the Assad-satellite Popular Front-General Command, has eagerly offered his services.

And indeed, Wednesday, the day after Netanyahu’s trip to Sochi, Jibril’s group let loose with mortar fire on the Israeli Mt. Hermon ski site, firing from a Syrian army position.

Israeli military sources confirmed later that these were no stray shells from a Syrian-army-rebel battle as in former cases, but a deliberate attack. In Jerusalem, it was taken as a direct consequence of Moscow’s account to Assad of the conversation between the Russian and Israeli leaders. They concluded that Assad took it for granted that he was now at liberty to go on the offensive against Israel.

Wednesday night, Netanyahu’s office reacted to this deterioration with a swift and strong warning.

Israeli media were informed bluntly that if the Assad chose to retaliate for Israel’s air strikes, he would be removed from power.
That same night, “a senior Israeli official” contacted The New York Times with a more detailed warning quoted by the paper: “If Syrian President Assad reacts by attacking Israel, or tries to strike Israel through his terrorist proxies, he will risk forfeiting his regime, for Israel will retaliate.”

Within hours, early Thursday morning, May 16, Jerusalem had its answer from Damascus.

A Palestinian group calling itself “Martyrs of the Abdel Qader al-Husseini Brigades” (named for the commander of a Palestinian force fighting Israel in its 1948 War of Independence) claimed responsibility for the “rockets” aimed at an Israeli military observation post in the Golan Heights. They were fired in honor of Nakba Day, said the statement released in Damascus “We are not celebrating but avenging the blood of our martyrs.”

A video showing the launch was appended.
Palestinian terrorist groups habitually use made-up names when claiming attacks, a practice often followed by al Qaeda, but this one was easily identified by Israel and taken to mean that Assad had begun using what the Israeli official referred to in The New York Times as “his terrorist proxies.”

Depending on the next move decided on by Prime Minister Netanyahu, Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon and Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz, this incident could mark the tipping-point of a slide towards a war confrontation against Israel by Syria, Hizballah and other Assad proxies.

Bad Behavior has blocked 2176 access attempts in the last 7 days.