Oil

...now browsing by tag

 
 

European Sour Crude to Stay Tight on Iran, Fuel Oil: JBC

Friday, May 3rd, 2013

Bloomberg News

By Sherry Su - May 3, 2013 3:33 AM PT

Supplies of sour, or high sulfur, crude oil in Europe will continue to be tight because of the loss of Iranian and Syrian exports and “strong” refining margins for fuel oil, according to JBC Energy GmbH.

“Fuel oil is finding support in arbitrage to Asia,” and while exports of Urals crude from Russiamay increase in June, “the continued loss of the bulk of Iranian and Syrian crude will keep the sour crude market tight in the region,” a JBC Energy team of analysts led by David Wech in Vienna said in a report today.

Russian Urals crude rose to a discount of 6 cents a barrel to Dated Brent today in the Mediterranean, the narrowest since Aug. 20, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Urals briefly traded at a premium to Dated Brent during July and August last summer. June loading programs for Urals crude in the Black Sea and Baltic Sea will be issued later this month.

The recent strength in Urals crude came from “an impressive array of factors,” including higher fuel oil refining margins, a tight May loading schedule of Urals and European Union’s sanctions on Iranian crude, the report said. JBC also cited the continued unreliability of Iraqi Kirkuk crude and the return of an estimated 1.4 million barrels a day of European refining capacity from maintenance versus April.

These factors are “largely expected to remain in place,” though the high prices for sour feedstock are already weighing on European margins, JBC said.

Iran Moves Away From Oil to Withstand Sanctions, Minister Says

Wednesday, April 24th, 2013

Bloomberg

By Kambiz Foroohar - Apr 23, 2013 4:43 PM PT

Iran’s finance minister says his country’s economy is adapting to Western sanctions by finding new markets for agriculture and mining products after oil exports plunged by almost half.

“We had to make adjustments,” Shamseddin Hosseini, Iran’s minister of economic affairs and finance, said in an interview yesterday at Iran’s Mission to the United Nations in New York. “We will work harder and find new ways and even change our trading partners.”

The U.S. and allies are restricting Iran’s oil exports, the country’s largest source of revenue, to pressure the government in Tehran to stop enriching uranium. The sanctions have driven the value of the Iranian rial down 80 percent in the past two years.

While the country’s oil exports have fallen 50 percent in the past year, the plunge in the rial’s value has helped exporters who can sell other goods more cheaply, Hosseini said. The Islamic Republic has increased exports of both agricultural and mining products, he said.

“We have seen an increase of 20 percent in non-oil exports,” Hosseini said. “We are making structural changes to our economy to reduce the impact of sanctions.”

Big Negative

That’s only part of the story, said Djavad Salehi-Isfahani, a professor of economics at Virginia Polytechnic and State University in Blacksburg.

“The currency devaluation has helped Iranian exporters and domestic producers to be competitive,” Salehi-Isfahani said in a telephone interview. “However, sanctions are a big negative because they prevent Iranian companies from transferring money or get access to technology.”

The U.S. and its allies including Israel and the European Union have accused Iran of seeking to develop nuclear weapons capability. Hosseini said Iran is enriching uranium for peaceful purposes and won’t back down from developing nuclear power.

“The development of peaceful civilian nuclear program is one of our highest priorities,” Hosseini said.

Western pressure has intensified over the past two years, subjecting Iran to dozens of sanctions including curbs on financial transactions and crude oil exports that are its main source of revenue.

“When you bring the central bank under sanctions, you are bringing all banks and financial institutions of a country under sanctions,” Hosseini said.

Exchange Rate

While the central bank’s official exchange rate is 12,260 rials per dollar, the currency trades on the street at about 37,000 per dollar. Iran’s inflation hit 30 percent last year from 21 percent the year before, Hosseini said. Unemployment has been around 12.2 percent in the past two years, he said.

In the fiscal year starting March 21, Iran projects a 40 percent decline in oil revenue, according to a draft budget submitted to the Majlis, the national assembly. The country expects to earn about 660 trillion rials during the fiscal year, according to official news agencies Mehr and Fars.

Iran’s economy is deteriorating as the Islamic Republic prepares for the June 14 presidential election. Hassan Rohani, a former nuclear negotiator, who plans to run in the June presidential race, said the country’s economy was in a “critical” situation.

In March Iran exported 1.1 million barrels a day, down from 1.26 million barrels in February, theInternational Energy Agency said in a report. Iranian exports are down from an average of 1.5 million barrels a day last year and 2.5 million in 2011, before sanctions intensified, according to estimates from the Paris-based IEA.

Patrick Clawson, an Iran analyst at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said in a report dated April 2 that the role of oil in Iran’s economy had declined as the country is reorienting its exports to focus on agriculture, mining and industry.

Hosseini said he wanted to reform the government budget to reduce the reliance on oil revenue. Last year, the government froze prices of basic food ingredients such as wheat and other grains.

Contradictory Forecasts

Hosseini who had visited Washington for a joint session of International Monetary Fund and theWorld Bank said Iran’s economy grew last year and he expected it to grow again this year. He declined to provide figures.

In contrast, the IMF says Iran’s economy shrank 1.9 percent in 2012 and is expected to decline another 1.3 percent this year. The IMF expects inflation to rise by 27 percent this year.

Hosseini said the country hasn’t been hurt by the drop in gold prices. Iran began buying gold four years as a hedge against U.S. sanctions. Gold futures have fallen 15 percent this year.

Iran’s foreign currency reserves remain healthy, Hosseini said. The National Development Fund, which receives at least 20 percent of the oil revenue to be used to develop the company has $48.5 billion.

“Economic sanctions have strengthened the economy,” Hosseini said. “They will not deter us from pursuing nuclear technology.”

Iran’s oil ministry says the country should export oil to North Korea

Saturday, April 20th, 2013

Published April 20, 2013

Associated Press

TEHRAN, Iran –  Iran’s oil ministry says the country is considering exporting oil to North Korea as a way to improve its battered economy.

The official IRNA news agency quoted on Saturday Oil Minister Rostam Ghasemi as saying talks are underway between Tehran and Pyongyang on oil exports.

An oil deal would bring the two nations deeply at odds with the U.S. and the West closer together. In September, they signed a scientific and technological cooperation agreement. A delegation from North Korea’s oil ministry is currently visiting Iran.

Iranian and North Korean officials have said in the past that their nations are in “one trench” in the confrontation with Western powers.

But Iran has denied a U.N. report saying the two have exchanged ballistic missiles, components and technology in violation of U.N. sanctions.

Iranian oil official announces big discoveries

Friday, April 19th, 2013

RadioZamaneh

Fri, 04/19/2013

The head of exploration for the National Iranian Oil Company has announced the discovery of unconventional oil and gas sources.

Hormoz Ghalavand commented on the location of these unconventional reserves, saying: “This region is located in Lorestan and it will take about a year and a half to determine the actual volume of these reserves.

Ghalavand also reported the discovery of gas hydrates in the Sea of Oman. He added that in the past year, 1.891 billion barrels of oil and 150 undeveloped oil and gas reserves have been discovered.

He said: “Before, Iran ranked fourth in the world in terms of its oil reserves and, with regard to gas resources, it was second only to Russia. However, its global ranking has now gone up.”

He said Iran’s oil reserves now rank it third in the world following Venezuela and Saudi Arabia.

He pointed out, however, that there will be a long process for reaching full exploitation of the newly discovered reserves, adding that Iran will enter into agreements with foreign companies to do so.

Brent Trades Near Four-Day High Before Iran Nuke Talks

Monday, February 25th, 2013

Bloomberg News

By Ben Sharples and Lananh Nguyen on February 25, 2013

Brent crude traded near the highest level in four days before international talks with Iran on its nuclear program. China increased fuel prices for the first time since September.

Futures rose as much as 1.6 percent after gaining 0.5 percent on Feb. 22. Iran, which is under a Western embargo on its oil exports, will meet the U.S., China, France, Germany, Russia and the U.K., or the so-called P5+1 group, tomorrow in Almaty, Kazakhstan, after an eight-month lapse in negotiations. The lack of a breakthrough may mean U.S. and European Union sanctions on Iran will continue to cost the Islamic republic about $98.9 million a day in lost oil sales, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

“Any hopes that progress might have been made between Iran and the P5+1 at their meeting this week appear to have been dashed by provocative comments from Iranian spokesmen trumpeting advances in uranium enrichment,” Nic Brown, head of commodities research at Natixis SA in London, said in an e-mailed response to questions today. The talks will probably be “another missed opportunity,” he said.

Brent for April settlement advanced as much as $1.77 to $115.87 a barrel, the highest level since it settled at $117.52 on Feb. 19. It was at $115.54 as of 1:28 p.m. local time on the London-based ICE Futures Europe exchange. The volume of all futures traded was 0.6 percent more than the 100-day average. The European benchmark crude was at a premium of $21.42 to West Texas Intermediate, up from $20.97 on Feb. 22.

Significant Producer

WTI for April delivery was at $94.14 a barrel, up $1.01, in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The contract rose to $93.13 on Feb. 22, the highest settlement since Feb. 20. Volume was 3 percent above the 100-day average. Front- month prices fell 2.9 percent last week, the most since December.

“Iran is still a significant producer and any major changes one way or the other to its production has the potential to have an impact on overall global supply,” said Ric Spooner, a chief market analyst at CMC Markets in Sydney.

Atomic Weapons

The country’s revenue from oil sales has dropped because of the sanctions, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said in a speech aired on state television Feb. 23. The nation says its nuclear program is for civilian use, while the U.S., the EU suspect it is developing atomic weapons.

Recent discoveries of uranium resources have almost tripled Iran’s reserves of the radioactive fuel to 4,400 tons, the Islamic Republic News Agency reported Feb. 23, citing Fereidoon Abbasi, the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran.

The Persian Gulf nation is installing more advanced centrifuges that will multiply its uranium enrichment capability, the United Nations’ International Atomic Energy Agency reported last week, adding that it was unable to conclude that all material was intended for peaceful purposes.

“There’s not much sign there will be any advancement in the negotiations this week,” Robin Mills, the head of consulting at Dubai-based Manaar Energy Consulting and Project Management, said yesterday. “I’m not hopeful for any deal being reached in Kazakhstan. I haven’t seen any signs the U.S. will offer Iran any sanctions relief.”

Gasoline Prices

Gasoline in China will increase by 300 yuan ($48) a metric ton and diesel by 290 yuan today, the National Development and Reform Commission said.

The fuel-price increase by China, the world’s second- biggest oil consumer, reflects recent international crude costs, the NDRC said in a statement on its website yesterday. Brent, the benchmark price for more than half the world’s oil, has gained 2.9 percent this year. The pump price of 90 octane, China III gasoline in Beijing will rise 3.1 percent to 10,030 yuan a ton, or $4.60 a U.S. gallon, according to NDRC data.

The average price of regular gasoline at U.S. pumps advanced 20.32 cents in the past two weeks to $3.795 a gallon, according to Lundberg Survey Inc. The survey covers the period ended Feb. 22 and is based on information obtained at about 2,500 filling stations by the Camarillo, California-based company. The average has jumped 53.71 cents this year and is 10.33 cents higher than a year earlier.

Hedge funds and other large speculators reduced bullish crude bets for the second time in three weeks as surging U.S. output boosted supplies. Money managers cut net-long positions, or wagers on rising prices, by 6.1 percent in the seven days to Feb. 19, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Commitments of Traders report on Feb. 22 showed. That was the biggest drop since the week ended Dec. 11.

They cut bullish bets on Brent crude for the second week, according to data from ICE Futures Europe.

Speculative bets that prices will advance, in futures and options combined, outnumbered long positions by 190,701 lots in the week ended Feb. 19, the London-based exchange said today in its weekly Commitment of Traders report. That’s down 1,453 contracts from a week earlier. Net-long positions rose to the most in more than two years in the week to Feb. 5.

Will the U.S. abandon the Middle East?

Thursday, December 6th, 2012

Alarabiya

By NASER AL-TAMIMI

Thursday, 06 December 2012

Naser Al-Tamimi

The World energy map will change in the next decade for ever. Fatih Birol, the Chief Economist at the International Energy Agency calls the surge of U.S. oil and gas production “the biggest change in the energy world since World War II.” The well known American expert Amy Myers Jaffe goes further to say that, by the 2020s, the capital of energy will likely have shifted back to the Western Hemisphere.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) in its annual report World Energy Outlook 2012 projects that the U.S. will overtake Russia as the world’s top gas producer by 2015 and will pass Saudi Arabia as the No. 1 global oil producer by 2017. By 2035 the U.S. is likely to be energy self-sufficient and an exporter of oil and liquefied natural gas. The IEA notes that unconventional oil which is primarily located in Americas stands at 3.19 trillion, exceeding Middle East dominated conventional oil of 2.67 trillion. Consequently; if these vast resources were extracted in a viable manner economically and environmentally, the additional supplies will certainly strengthens the position of oil-consuming countries and lower the concentration of energy resources in the Middle East and the influence of OPEC on the world oil markets. The United States will have much greater ability to make up for any import disruption through the country’s strategic reserves of oil.

With its own domestic energy production potentially freeing the United States from dependence on Middle East oil, some are beginning to ask whether the world’s pre-eminent superpower should bear the cost of policing the Gulf. The IEA report World Energy Outlook 2012 hinted, it is arguable that future American military interventions in the Gulf region would be less likely. As Javier Solana, former Secretary-General of Nato and EU High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy puts it recently: “For the U.S., energy self-sufficiency is the perfect excuse for a phased withdrawal from the Middle East; freed from energy dependency, America should be able to concentrate on the Pacific.”

Indeed, the American public could question the old mantra that “any threat to Middle East oil supplies correlated to a direct threat to American national security”. The longstanding legacy of the “Carter Doctrine” could gradually become a thing of the past, or at least become less strategically significant to the United States. Over time, U.S. taxpayers will question why they are paying for the Fifth Fleet to do the job. Why on earth, many Americans are asking, should the United States try to police a region, when all it gets in return is mindless abuse and violence? In that regard, the Obama administration’s “pivot” to Asia has already been taking shape for at least two years. As Tom Donilon, the White House national security adviser argues lately: “The US is a Pacific power whose interests are inextricably linked with Asia’s economic, security and political order (…) America’s success in the 21st century is tied to the success of Asia”. Maybe these developments what made Yoel Guzansky the research fellow at the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University to write recently in Haaretz, “An American presence in the region is an Israeli interest of the first degree, and we must do everything in our power to maintain it”.

In reality, however, it is not that simple. David Goldwyn, a former U.S. State Department special envoy for international energy, wrote in the New York Times that “the U.S. suddenly having a great wealth of domestically produced gas and, increasingly, oil, the argument follows, will allow the United States to look inward and take less interest in international affairs, including Middle East (…) this is unlikely to happen”. Indeed, the United States engagement in the Middle East is not simply about oil imports. Everyone knows America hasn’t needed Middle East oil for years. U.S. President Barack Obama always mentioned what he called four “core interests” in the region. (a) “Countering terrorism”, (b) “Stopping the spread of nuclear weapons”, (c) “Securing the free flow of commerce”, and, (d) “Standing up for Israel’s security and pursuing Arab Israeli peace”.

Furthermore, the United States would still need to worry about the Middle East since oil prices are set globally. In the U.S. Department of Energy’s reference case for 2035, total U.S. consumption of petroleum and other liquids, including both fossil fuels and bio-fuels, rises from 19.2 million barrels per day in 2010 to 19.9 million barrels per day in 2035 in the Reference case. The net import share of domestic consumption, which reached 60 percent in 2005 and 2006 before falling to 49 percent in 2010, continues falling in the Reference case to 36 percent in 2035. The bottom line: U.S. oil prices still depend on what happens abroad not the source or quantity of U.S. imports. The IEA warned that a fall in oil imports would not insulate the U.S. from developments in international markets or end its vulnerability to price spikes. The World Energy Outlook 2012 stated clearly that: “No country is energy -Island- and the interactions between different fuels, markets and prices are intensifying. Most oil consumers are used to the effects of worldwide fluctuations in price but consumers can expect to see growing linkages in other areas”.

Above all, at the strategic level, if Washington wants to remain central to Asia the U.S. administration always argues, there is no getting around the reality of Asian reliance on Gulf oil. As the Financial Times noted “The pivot to Asia does not pull America away from the Gulf. It takes it back by a different route”. Within this context, the Economist summaries the situation in a very interesting words: The Middle East is still the crucible of Islam: so much that affects American diplomacy around the rest of the world, from Pakistan to Indonesia, Nigeria, and even the suburbs of Paris, has its starting point here. It is the world’s energy centre: the Middle East still sets the price at America’s petrol stations. And the region is home to many of America’s most committed enemies, including Iran”. Most Americans may wish to keep out of the Middle East quagmire, unfortunately for them; the region will always re-play the proverb “if you can’t live with us, you can’t escape from us.”

(Naser AL-Tamimi is a UK-based Middle East analyst with particular research interest in energy politics and political economy of Saudi Arabia, the Gulf and Middle East- Asia relations.)

Dependence on oil a “trap”: Iran’s leader

Monday, July 30th, 2012

RadioZamaneh

Mon, 07/30/2012
Ayatollah Khamenei

Ayatollah Khamenei, Iran’s Supreme Leader, says Iran’s dependence on crude exports is a “trap” and the country needs to wean its economy off oil revenues.

ISNA reports that in a meeting with Iranian researchers and experts on Sunday, the Supreme Leader said: “Producing wealth from finite resources such as oil is self-deception.”

He added that Iran must reach a point where it can block its oil wells and end the sale of crude products.

Ayatollah Khamenei went on to add: “It is possible to reach such a point by relying on science and the knowledge base.”

Iran produces 4.2 million barrels of oil per day, of which 1.7 million is for domestic consumption.

Oil exports account for about 80 percent of Iran’s foreign revenues. Since U.S. and EU sanctions on Iranian oil took effect in the past month, Iran has had to deal with a significant drop in its oil revenues.

Iranian officials, however, have played down the effect of sanctions. Iranian vice president Mohammadreza Rahimi said earlier: “They do not know Iran, because oil only plays a role in 10 percent of the country’s economy.”

He added that in the past year, Iran’s non-petroleum exports passed $53 billion, and this year there are plans to raise that to between $70 billion and $75 billion.

Despite such statements, reports from Iran indicate that the economy is facing definite challenges, with the Iranian currency flagging and the price of basic goods soaring.

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei had earlier called for the adoption of a “resistance economy” to overcome the current difficulties by focusing on domestic production.

Oil below $92 as weak demand, Iran tension weighed

Saturday, July 21st, 2012

Yahoo News

07/20/2012

AP – Oil slipped below $92 a barrel Friday, after a big jump the day before, as weak demand was weighed against rising Middle East tensions.

By early afternoon in Europe, benchmark crude was down $1.14 at $91.83 a barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The contract surged $2.79, about 3 percent, to settle at $92.66 in New York on Thursday, its highest level since mid-May.

In London, Brent crude was down $1.02 at $106.78 on the ICE Futures exchange.

The oil market is responding to a series of events that have raised concerns that Iran will try to block oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway in the Persian Gulf through which one-fifth of the world’s oil travels every day. The U.S. and Europe have applied sanctions against Iranian oil exports as they try to wring concessions from Tehran over a nuclear energy program they believe is a cover for eventually producing nuclear weapons.

In the past few weeks negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program appeared to have failed, a U.S. Navy ship fired on a boat in the Persian Gulf and Iran said it has devised a specific plan to block oil shipments. Then, on Wednesday, seven Israelis were killed in a suicide attack in Bulgaria. Israel blamed Iran for the attack, and vowed to strike back. Iran has denied involvement.

Analysts say Middle East tensions could cause further spikes for oil but they might not be long-lasting. The world’s two biggest crude consumers — the U.S. and China — are both grappling with economic slowdowns that are crimping demand for oil. Supplies, meanwhile, are plentiful.

The recent rise in oil prices — the Nymex contract closed two weeks ago at $84.45 — was motivated not only by the higher geopolitical risks, but were also “a correction to the excessive slump” experienced in past weeks, said analysts at JBC Energy in Vienna.

“Very limited global spare capacity on the supply side combined with seasonal upticks in oil consumption … could support further price increases,” JBC said. “On the other hand, lackluster economic news appears likely to put a stop to the recent rally rather sooner than later. Overall, the current price level would fit quite well with our perception of oil market fundamentals.”

In other Nymex energy trading, natural gas was up 0.2 cent at $3.001 per thousand cubic feet. Heating oil was off 2.57 cents at $2.9213 a gallon and gasoline fell 3.63 cents to $2.9026 a gallon.

 

Oil higher on stimulus hopes, Iran tensions

Monday, July 16th, 2012

By Robert Gibbons

NEW YORK | Mon Jul 16, 2012 1:40pm EDT

(Reuters) – Oil prices rose on Monday, lifted by hopes that signs of economic slowing will prompt stimulus measures, especially in China, and by news a U.S. Navy vessel near the United Arab Emirates fired on a small boat that failed to heed warnings.

The U.S. Navy incident followed more tough talk over the weekend fromIran about shutting the Strait of Hormuz as Iran’s dispute with the West over Tehran’s nuclear program continues to keep the region and oil traders tense.

China’s Premier Wen Jiabao, in remarks published on Sunday, said efforts to stabilize the economy are working and the government will step up efforts in the second half of the year to increase policy effectiveness and foresight.

“Prospects of more monetary easing are growing, supporting risk appetite – in China first, as the government takes policy measures to protect economic growth, but also in the U.S.,” said analysts at BNP Paribas.

Brent August crude rose $1.11 to $103.51 a barrel by 1:27 p.m. EDT (1727 GMT), having swung from $102.07 to $103.60.

Brent September crude was up $1.35 at $102.77.

After closing above its 50-day moving average on Friday, front-month Brent’s next key resistance is expected at $103.74 – the 38.2 percent Fibonacci retracement of the second-quarter retreat from the 2012 peak above $128.

U.S. August crude was up 45 cents at $87.55 a barrel, having traded from $86.41 to $87.84, above and below the U.S. front-month crude 50-day moving average at $87.19.

Total crude trading volumes were relatively light, with both Brent and U.S. crude turnover more than 40 percent below their 30-day averages.

Brent’s premium to U.S. crude increased and hovered above $16 a barrel.

Disappointing U.S. retail sales data initially weighed on Wall Street equities and limited U.S. crude gains and both Brent and U.S. contracts saw choppy trading.

The euro turned higher against the U.S. dollar, and a weaker dollar index .DXY added support for dollar-denominated oil prices. <USD/>

“The euro had a big reversal and we’re following along,” said Mark Anderle, a trader for TAC Energy in Dallas.

Oil prices rallied on Friday when China’s second-quarter GDP figures, in line with expectations for slower growth, dispelled fears China was heading for a hard landing.

IRANIAN THREATS

A naval commander in Iran’s elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said on Saturday that Iran will increase its military presence in international waters and that Iranian naval forces have the capability to prevent even “a single drop of oil” from passing through the Strait of Hormuz.

Iran’s parliament is considering a bill calling for the strait to be closed until sanctions against Iran are lifted.

“The price reaction to the news of the boat being fired on by the U.S. Navy just shows how fragile the situation is considered to be,” said Phil Flynn, analyst at Price Futures Group in Chicago.

The United States on Thursday attempted to ratchet up sanctions intended to limit Iran’s ability to export oil, with the Treasury department exposing dozens of front companies, tankers and banks that were helping Tehran evade restrictions.

The measures underpin U.S. and European Union sanctions designed to deprive Iran of oil revenue and pressure Tehran to curb its nuclear program, which Tehran maintains is solely for peaceful purposes.

Abu Dhabi Bypasses Hormuz In Exporting First Pipeline Oil

Sunday, July 15th, 2012

Bloomberg

By Anthony DiPaola and Ayesha Daya - Jul 15, 2012 8:51 AM PT

Abu Dhabi started exporting its first crude from a pipeline that bypasses the Strait of Hormuz, shipping the fuel to a refinery in Pakistan.

The pipeline, stretching from Abu Dhabi to the neighboring sheikhdom of Fujairah on the Gulf of Oman, was loading the first shipment of 500,000 barrels to the Pakistani plant, Mohamed Bin Dhaen Al-Hamli, oil minister for the United Arab Emirates, said today at a ceremony to inaugurate the network. International Petroleum Investment Co. spent $4.2 billion building the 423- kilometer (263-mile) link, Khadem Al-Qubaisi, managing director of the Abu Dhabi-run fund known as IPIC, said at the ceremony in Fujairah.

Abu Dhabi, the U.A.E.’s capital and holder of more than 90 percent of its oil, built the link as an export route for crude that avoids Hormuz at the mouth of the Persian GulfIran has threatened to block the strait, a chokepoint for tankers carrying a fifth of the world’s traded oil, in retaliation for sanctions targeting the country’s nuclear program. The U.A.E., the fifth-biggest oil producer in OPEC, pumped 2.61 million barrels a day in June, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Fujairah is one of the U.A.E.’s seven sheikhdoms.

Iranian Response

An Iranian lawmaker, Mohammad-Hassan Asferi, said today the pipeline’s limited capacity would keep it from obviating the need of regional suppliers to export most of their oil through the strait. He dismissed the project as “propaganda and political maneuvering guided by the Western countries, especially theUnited States, which aims to reduce the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz,” according to state-run Press TV. Asferi serves on the national security and foreign policy committee of Iran’s parliament.

Abu Dhabi’s first export cargo from Fujairah is destined for Pak Arab Refinery Ltd., a joint venture between Pakistan’s government and IPIC, Al-Qubaisi said. IPIC owns a 40 percent stake in the plant, which regularly uses about 40,000 barrels a day of Abu Dhabi crude, of the 100,000 barrels it consumes daily, he said.

Abu Dhabi earlier shipped a test cargo from Fujairah to its own refinery at Ruwais, inside the Persian Gulf, said Abdul Munim Al-Kindi, general manager of Abu Dhabi Co. for Onshore Oil Operations. As the main oil producer at the emirate’s onshore fields, the company, known as ADCO, will operate the pipeline and gradually expand its capacity by year-end, he said. The network is designed to load tankers at three offshore buoys, Al- Kindi said.

Fujairah’s Expansion

IPIC’s Al-Qubaisi said his company plans to spend as much as $5 billion to build a refinery in Fujairah with a capacity of about 250,000 barrels a day to produce for local sale and export, further enhancing the port’s importance as a hub for the processing, storage and shipment of fuels. The company is working with another state-owned investment fund, Mubadala Development Co., on a project for a terminal at the port for imports of liquefied natural gas. Fujairah is already among the world’s three biggest refuelling ports for commercial ships, along with Singapore and Rotterdam.

Al-Hamli, the oil minister, said the pipeline gives buyers an alternative location from which to receive crude. It will allow them to fill very large crude carriers, or VLCCs, the largest class of tanker capable of carrying 2 million barrels of oil. Filling such vessels in the Gulf of Oman will reduce shipping traffic in Hormuz, he said.

Shipping Flexibility

“The pipeline is going to be beneficial because our clients will be able to lift bigger cargoes,” he said. “Currently you can only lift 1 million barrels a day from Ruwais. From Fujairah now our clients now can bring in VLCCs and lift more.”

The pipeline can transport 1.5 million barrels a day of Murban crude from Habshan, a collection point for Abu Dhabi’s onshore oil fields, across a desert and mountains to Fujairah. The system is able to pump as much as 1.8 million barrels a day at periodic intervals, officials said at the inauguration. IPIC will likely charge ADCO “a few cents per barrel” for use of the pipeline, Al-Qubaisi said.

The first oil exported from Fujairah is priced the same as Murban crude loaded inside the Gulf, three people with knowledge of the matter said this month. Abu Dhabi may later devise a separate formula including a premium to account for the cost of using the pipeline, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the matter is confidential. Abu Dhabi officials today did not comment on pricing.

Oil sanctions against Iran will not be enough

Monday, July 9th, 2012

washingtonpost.com

By Michael Singh, Published: July 8

Michael Singh is managing director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. From 2005 to 2008, he worked on Middle East issues at the National Security Council.

Predictably, last week’s “expert level” talks between Iran and world powers were no more fruitful than previous rounds, leaving little optimism for a negotiated resolution to the nuclear crisis anytime soon. Western policymakers, buoyed by their success in reducing Iran’s oil exports , appear content to give sanctions more time to work, in the hope that once Tehran feels their full effect negotiators will return to the table, more ready to compromise.

The evidence, however, suggests that sanctions’ effect on oil exports will not increase over time.

First, Western policymakers tend to focus more on what Iran has lost than what it has retained or gained. That’s fine for a political debate but bad for making sensible policy. It is true that Iran’s oil exports have declined from 2.5 million barrels per day to 1.5 million. But that reduced level is hardly meager: Iran is still one of the world’s top oil exporters, from which it earns billions in hard currency. And nothing suggests that the drop in earnings has stunted Iran’s nuclear program, which is the target of Western ire. Iran is enriching uranium faster and to higher levels than ever before. If any party appears to feel a need to compromise, it is the “P5 + 1” (the United States, Britain, China, France, Russia and Germany). They have dropped demands that Iran fully halt enrichment in favor of requesting that it merely cap enrichment at a low level.

Furthermore, the historical evidence does not suggest that sanctions’ effect on regimes grows over time. Numerous examples — including Moammar Gaddafi’s Libya, Saddam Hussein’s Iraq and present-day North Korea — demonstrate that such regimes are resilient and can hold out for a long time in the face of sanctions — and can even adapt to or circumvent them. There is also good reason to believe that states that reluctantly complied with oil sanctions will not make further reductions and may even increase oil imports from Iran as economic activity — and thus oil demand — recovers.Recent data suggest that Chinese oil purchases from Iran have increased despite a dropoff in the first quarter of this year.

So while policymakers may hope that oil sanctions will continue to pay dividends, it is likely that the full effect has already taken hold. If the United States and its allies wait to see which is the case, the result could be a prolonged period of inaction similar to the one that followed the June 2010 passage of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1929 and lasted until Congress and the European Union passed oil sanctions in late 2011. Like any good pugilist, Washington should follow the heavy blow of oil sanctions with further unrelenting pressure.

The most recent sanctions have been so significant because they seized on Iranian dependence on oil-export revenue — one of the regime’s key vulnerabilities. To meaningfully increase the pressure, policymakers should identify and exploit the regime’s other vulnerabilities.

One is Iran’s limited international support. The regime has few true allies. The most important of them is Syria, and bolder international efforts to oust the regime of Bashar al-Assad would considerably weaken Tehran’s position, as would greater emphasis on interdicting arms and funding flowing to and from Iran.

Another key Iranian vulnerability is the regime’s growing internal isolation. The West should not be shy about cultivating Iranians outside the narrow circle around Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei or providing support to dissidents in Iran.

Finally, Washington should bolster the credibility of its military threat. Recent steps to strengthen its force posture in the Persian Gulf are a good start. They should be accompanied by more serious statements about U.S. willingness to employ force and an end to statements exaggerating the downsides of military action. This is likely to garner attention in both Tehran and Beijing. If the alternative is military conflict in the Persian Gulf, China may see further reductions in its Iranian oil imports — which would be the most significant way to strengthen the current sanctions — as prudent.

Western policymakers’ assertions that there is time for sanctions to work are a bit like a marathon runner saying he has plenty of time to finish the race. There may be time, but the latest round of talks’ failure to make progress despite mounting pressure on Iran suggests we also have a long way to go.

Iran losing billions as oil exports extend slump

Thursday, July 5th, 2012

REUTERS, 05/07 17:11 CET

SINGAPORE/TOKYO (Reuters) – Iran will see its July oil exports more than halved from regular levels seen last year because tough new Western sanctions are stifling flows and costing Tehran more than $3 billion in lost revenue per month.

Declining oil exports, the lifeblood of the Iranian economy, will increase Tehran’s struggle to contain spiralling inflation and mounting unemployment amid its standoff with the West over its nuclear programme.

“They will eventually have to close down production. Right now it seems very unlikely that they will get any relief from sanctions any time soon,” said an executive with a Western oil firm with a long history of dealing with Iran.

Exports in July will be a maximum of 1.1 million barrels per day (bpd), said an industry source familiar with Iran’s monthly shipping plans and who declined to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter.

Iranian exports have declined steadily from the 2.2 million bpd average in 2011, as its oil buyers cut imports to comply with U.S. and European Union sanctions imposed due to concerns the country is attempting to build a nuclear bomb.

Iran says its nuclear activities are peaceful.

It was estimated to have shipped between 1.2 million and 1.3 million bpd in June, industry sources said last month.

But actual July exports could be even lower as top buyer China disputes freight costs with Iran’s top tanker company, delaying the loading of cargoes set to flow east.

India, Iran’s second-largest oil buyer, could also reduce July loadings as Iran struggles to find tankers of the size Indian refiners require.

Japan and South Korea, among Iran’s top five buyers, have halted all Iranian imports this month due to complications with shipping insurance, also sanctioned by the EU.

Japan is expected to resume buying this year. It has been granted exemption from U.S. sanctions last month after having already steeply reduced purchases.

If Iran exported 1.1 million bpd in July, it would mean the country’s budget losing around $3.4 billion revenue this month compared with a year ago, when exports amounted to 2.2 million bpd and Brent oil prices stood at around $110 versus $100 today.

Iranian oil usually sells at a discount of several dollars to benchmark dated Brent.

DWINDLING STORAGE SPACE

As sales fall, Iran has been forced to store its unwanted crude on tankers in the Gulf and cut production to an estimated 2.95 million bpd, the lowest in nearly a quarter of a century, as it runs out of onshore and offshore storage capacity.

In April, shipping sources said Iran had been forced to deploy more than half its fleet to store oil at anchorage in the Gulf, equating to 33 million barrels.

The country is expected to store at least a further 8.3 million barrels this month, double the amount in June, the source familiar with the shipping plans said.

But as it stores more crude, it may struggle to complete deliveries to Asian customers, who request Iran makes deliveries on its own tankers.

The Islamic Republic is expected to load a maximum of 890,000 barrels per day for its top Asia buyers, the source said, down 40 percent from the 1.48 million bpd taken during the same period last year.

China was scheduled to take a maximum of 492,000 bpd for July loading and India some 300,000 bpd at most.

Japan will load around 98,000 bpd for mid-August delivery, industry sources said. In Europe, Turkey and Italy were the only countries which continue to import Iranian oil after the start of the EU embargo.

Turkey is buying around 160,000 bpd of oil from Tehran, down about a fifth from last year’s average.

This week, Kenya emerged as the potential buyer of up to 80,000 bpd of Iranian oil, but quickly cancelled the deal under pressure from Washington and Brussels.

(Reporting by Luke Pachymuthu in Singapore and Osamu Tsukimori in Tokyo, Peg Mackey in London; Writing by Randy Fabi and Dmitry Zhdannikov; Editing by Simon Webb and David Hulmes)

Bad Behavior has blocked 1956 access attempts in the last 7 days.