Mullahs

...now browsing by tag

 
 

US fears Iran’s links to Al Qaeda as officials believe country may have provided aid to terror group

Friday, February 3rd, 2012

Published February 03, 2012

The Wall Street Journal

WASHINGTON –  U.S. officials say they believe Iran recently gave new freedoms to as many as five top Al Qaeda operatives who have been under house arrest, including the option to leave the country, and may have provided some material aid to the terrorist group.

The men, who were detained in Iran in 2003, make up Al Qaeda’s so-called management council, a group that includes members of the inner circle that advised Usama bin Laden and an explosives expert widely considered a candidate for a top post in the organization.

The assertions are likely to amplify tensions between Washington and Tehran. A U.S. Senate committee on Thursday moved to intensify sanctions to force Iran into negotiations on its nuclear program, while Tehran has largely defied pressure. This week, Iran prevented UN nuclear inspectors from gaining access to sites and scientists, according to diplomats.

Skeptics caution that intelligence on Iran’s activities is limited and worry that some policy makers might use provocative reports to justify military action against Tehran. Iran has denied any connection with Al Qaeda.

U.S. officials believe there have been recent indications that officials in the Iranian government have provided Al Qaeda operatives in Iran limited assistance, including logistical help, money and cars, according to a person briefed on the developments.

Adding to the U.S. pressure on Iran, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told senators in an annual intelligence assessment that U.S. agencies believe the Iranian regime is now more willing to conduct an attack in the U.S.

“We have to be vigilant for more of that,” Clapper told lawmakers Thursday.

The reports come at a time of growing concern about Iran’s decision-making. President Barack Obama, in his recent State of the Union address, said, “America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal.”

 

 

 

 

Panetta Says Iran Could Develop Nuclear Weapon Within A Year

Monday, January 30th, 2012

RFE/RL

Last updated (GMT/UTC): 30.01.2012 09:19

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta says analysts believe that Iran could develop a nuclear weapon within about one year if Tehran decided to do so.

Speaking on the CBS “60 Minutes” program broadcast on January 29, Panetta said it would probably take Iran another two to three years to produce a missile or other vehicle that could deliver the weapon to a target.

Panetta’s comments came while a team of inspectors from the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog agency, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), is at work in Iran.

Panetta reiterated that the United States does not want Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. He called this a “red line” for both the U.S. and its ally Israel.

“If they proceed and we get intelligence that they are proceeding with developing a nuclear weapon, then we will take whatever steps are necessary to stop them,” he said.

Iran’s leadership denies any effort to make a nuclear weapon.

Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said he was “optimistic” about the mission, which is due to be in Iran until January 31.

“Of course I do not mean that a miracle will happen overnight,” Salehi added, “but you know a long journey starts with the first step.”

He added that inspectors would be allowed to visit any site in Iran that they wished.

On January 29, Iranian parliament speaker Ali Larijani said the IAEA’s visit is a “test” for the agency, adding that Iran would cooperate if the IAEA acted “professionally” and not as “a tool of the West.”

An IAEA report in November said some aspects of the Iranian nuclear program could only have military applications.

In his State of the Union address last week, President Barack Obama warned Tehran over its nuclear plans. “Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal,” Obama said.

A draft analysis by the Institute for Science and International Security quoted by “The Guardian” predicted that Israel would attack Iran in 2012 to derail an alleged nuclear weapons program. The report suggested Iran was “unlikely to dash toward making nuclear weapons as long as its uranium-enrichment capability remains as limited as it is today.”

compiled from agency reports

 

Iranian Scientific Elite Sacrificed at the Altar of Nuclear Policies

Friday, January 20th, 2012

RadioZamaneh

Fri, 01/20/2012
Hamid Mafi

Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan is the fifth Iranian scientist to become the target of terrorist operations. He was a professor of physics at Sanati Sharif University in Tehran and deputy director for commercial affairs at Natanz nuclear plant .

According to Iranian media, the physicist was killed in a terrorist attack near the Ministry of Intelligence headquarters, and Iran’s political and security officials have attributed the assassination to Western countries and, specifically, Israel.

The head of the Tehran Provisions Council told Fars News Agency: “The assassination of Ahmadi Roshan was carried out by the Israeli intelligence service.” He claims that in the lead-up to Iran’s parliamentary elections in March, Western intelligence services are trying to provoke a security clampdown that will discourage people from going out in public during the elections.

Mohammad Esmail Kosari, a Tehran representative in Parliament and a member of the National Security Commission, told Fars News Agency: “Ahmadi Roshan’s assassination is completely targeted and similar to the assassination of Shahriyari.” He also insists that Western countries and Israel are trying to stop Iran’s advance in nuclear science.

Such official accusations against foreign countries, however, follow previous efforts to attribute the assassinations to domestic opposition groups or unexpected accidents.

The mysterious death of the centrifuge designer

The first Iranian physicist killed in the past five years was Ardeshir Hosseinpour, who had a PhD in Physics and was a professor at Malek Ashtar University. He was killed in February of 2007, and the cause of his death was reported in the media as inhalation of fumes from a gas leak.

Iranian security forces and Iran’s Atomic Energy Agency made every effort to conceal the news of his death, but five days after the incident, Iran’s national broadcaster reported on the mysterious fate of the Malek Ashtar and Shiraz University professor.

While Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization denied any links between Hosseinpour and Iran’s nuclear program, the Baztab website, run by former Revolutionary Guards commander and secretary of the Expediency Council Mohsen Rezai, announced that Hosseinpour was a designer of nuclear centrifuges.

According to this report, Hosseinpour was in charge of 12 top defence projects, including the propulsion motors for Shahab 3 missiles.

At the time of Hosseinpour’s death, The Sunday Times of London quoted the Texas-based private intelligence company Stratfor, saying that Hosseinpour was connected with Iran’s nuclear project and had been poisoned by radioactive gases.

The report also quoted the company saying that the Iranian scientist was probably targeted by Israeli intelligence services.

Russia’s Novosti News Agency reported that Hosseinpour could have been the father of Iran’s atomic bomb and speculated that he might have been assassinated by the Mossad.

However, five years ago, Iranian security and nuclear officials denied that Israel had any hand in Hosseinpour’s death and insisted that Western security agencies lack the capability to carry out such operations in Iran.

Iran’s official media stuck to the story that Hosseinpour was killed by gas inhalation in the Shiraz University dormitory, though some indicated that he might have been poisoned during nuclear tests at the Natanz nuclear facilities.

Assassination of two physicists

Three years after the death of Ardeshir Hosseinpour, two simultaneous terrorist operations were carried out in Iran. One targeted Majid Shahriyari, another nuclear physics professor, this time at Shahid Beheshti University, and a designer of the configurations of the 20-percent-enriched fuel plates for nuclear centrifuges.

The attack claimed the life of Majid Shahriyari, who was described as Iran’s top nuclear scientist by the former head of Iran’s Atomic Agency and the current foreign minister, Ali Akbar Salehi. That same day, nuclear scientist Fereydoon Abbasi Davani was targeted in a separate assassination attempt, which he survived, and he now heads Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization.

Those two assassination attempts were quite different. Shahriyari was killed with a remote-control bomb, while Abbasi Davani was shot at while in his car.

This time, Iranian security officials accused Israel and the U.S. of carrying out the attacks, and Intelligence Minister Heydar Moslehi announced: “We have several clues as to who perpetrated the assassination attempts on our two top physicists.”

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad attributed the assassinations to British intelligence services. Parliamentary Speaker Ali Larijani and MP Mohammad Esmail Kosari accused Israel and the U.S. The Fars News Agency maintained that the countries involved in nuclear negotiations with Iran were behind these terrorist operations.

Some analysts declared, however, that the attempt on Abbasi Davani’s life was staged, citing the differences between the two operations as ample proof of their allegations.

Massoud Ali-Mohammadi, professor and protester

A year before the double assassination attempts, at at time when the Islamic Republic regime was cracking down on demonstrations against the election results, Massoud Ali-Mohammadi, a physics professor at Tehran University, was killed in a terrorist attack in front of his home. While domestic and international media linked him to Iran’s nuclear dossier, that was denied by Ahmad Shirzad, a reformist MP in the sixth Parliament.

Iran’s Atomic Energy Agency also denied that Ali-Mohammadi was on staff there. However, Parliamentary Speaker Larijani described Ali- Mohammadi as a figure in Iran’s nuclear program and once again linked his death to Israel and the U.S.

A number of Iranian newspapers, however, reported that Ali-Mohammadi was a supporter of MirHosein Mousavi, the presidential candidate who had challenged Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s victory in the 2009 presidential election, and added that he had been very vocal in his criticism of the government.

The assassination of Ali-Mohammadi spawned much speculation and several theories. The Islamic Students Society and Conservative MP Hamid Resai maintained that the election protests led to Ali-Mohammadi’s assassination, and some internet sites speculated that the government might have been involved in staging the attack. None of these statements was ever corroborated by any evidence.

The athlete that was presented as a terrorist

The Russian daily Kommersant and another Iranian analyst claimed that Ali-Mohammadi was indeed an Iranian nuclear scientist, and that it was possible his assassination had been carried out by Israeli security services. These statements were backed by pointing out similarities between Ali-Mohammadi’s assassination and the Israeli operation that targeted an Iraqi nuclear scientist.

Fars News Agency, however, said the dissident group Anjoman-e Padeshahi Iran was responsible for the attack, which the organization immediately denied.

Finally, a year after the assassination of this prominent professor, the Islamic Republic Intelligence Ministry announced that it had arrested Ali-Mohammadi’s killers.

Later, Iranian state television aired parts of the alleged confession of Farshid Jamali fash, in which he admitted having been trained by the Israeli intelligence service to assassinate Ali-Mohammadi.

Once Jamali fash was seen on television, it was discovered that he was a member of Iran’s national kickboxing team as well as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s election campaign.

While he claimed that he had assassinated Ali-Mohammadi on a mission from the Mossad, Israel denied any links between Jamali fash and its intelligence agency.

Daryoosh Rezainejad became the next member of Iran’s scientific elite to be killed in a terrorist attack. Domestic media first described him as a physicist connected with Iran’s nuclear program, but hours later this was denied, and it was announced instead that he had been working with the Ministry of Defence.

Iran once again accused Israel of carrying out Rezainejad’s assassination, maintaining that it had been mistaken in its target. Months after this incident, there has still been no information released about Rezainejad’s assassins.

Unknown Terrorists

Now, with the assassination of Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan, the subject of Iran’s targeted nuclear scientists has come into the spotlight once more. Iran has again accused Israel of perpetrating the act, and the Foreign Ministry spokesman is already making retaliatory statements.

A day after Ahmadi Roshan’s assassination, Hossein Shariatmadari, the managing director of the Keyhan daily, who is considered a direct conduit for the Supreme Leader’s views, criticized the government and the security services for failing to retaliate against the terrorist attacks.

In an editorial, Shariatmadari wrote: “One must ask why the Islamic Republic is not exercising its right to respond in kind, which is recognized not only in Islamic teaching but also in all the international legal systems under the section ‘Retaliate’?”

He added: “It is easily possible for the Islamic Republic’s intelligence and security services, which have become veterans of the all-out war with the intelligence and security forces of the enemy through 32 years of vast and complex experiences, to assassinate Israeli military and government officials.”

Israel has refrained from responding to the accusations regarding Ahmadi Roshan, but U.S. Foreign Secretary Hilary Clinton condemned the terrorist act and emphasized that her country had no role in the operation and condemns the murder of innocent people.

Javan-on-line, a website connected with the political bureau of the Revolutionary Guards, has claimed to possess several clues regarding Ahmadi Roshan’s assassination. It claimed that it is trying to identify the assailants using video captures from traffic cameras. Iran’s Intelligence Minister has also said the perpetrators will soon be announced.

The Islamic Iran Participation Front, a reformist opposition group that has been banned since the controversial protests against the disputed 2009 presidential election, has issued a statement addressing the terrorist attacks of the past three years, calling on the country’s security forces to concentrate on protecting Iranian scientists rather than arresting political activists and creating a security-laden atmosphere all across the country.

A  number of political activists have also urged the government to stop its nuclear adventurism and the sacrifice of Iranian professors and scientists on the altar of their erroneous policies.

Five years after the mysterious death of Ardeshir Hosseinpour, and with another four terrorist operations carried out since, Iran’s security forces have presented only one alleged perpetrator, Farshid Jamali fash, as the accused killer of Massoud Ali-Mohammadi, a crime they claim is linked to the Mossad.

Even this claim has been called dubious by several analysts and media outlets, and the public still awaits the real story behind the serial assassination of Iranian scientists.

 

 

The Officer Journal: CIA operative and former Iranian Guard member discusses the Iran force U.S. troops face today.

Thursday, January 19th, 2012

ROA Reserve Strength

01/19, 2012

CIA operative and former Iranian Guard member discusses the Iran force U.S. troops face today.

The Officer Journal

By: Christopher Prawdzik, Editor

January – February 2012 Edition

In early 2007, then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen Peter Pace told Congress that Iranians were a focus of efforts in Iraq. And he noted that in the previous weeks, while trying to pursue insurgent networks in Iraq, U.S. forces had captured Iranians…

… Still, as troops face these threats, particularly in Afghanistan and Iraq, gaining an understanding of that force is an evolutionary process in which troops, no doubt, are deeply engaged.

… “I think as a whole [U.S. officials] do not understand the seriousness of the [Iranian] ideology,” Mr. Kahlili said. “We know what factions they support, how they train … but they misunderstand their goals.”

Click on each page to read:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Officer is the bimonthly journal of the Reserve Officers Association. Its pages are devoted to important topics for Reserve Component members and editions include the following:

  • Feature stories, expert analysis, and in-depth articles on the Reserve Components, missions involving Citizen Warriors, national security issues, and Reservists balancing civilian and military careers;
  • An insider’s review of legislation affecting Reservists and ROA’s activities among policymakers;
  • Discussion of legal issues specifically concerning Citizen Warriors and their families;
  • Reports on and profiles of programs for Reservists’ spouses and children;
  • Reviews of books and videos relevant to Citizen Warriors.

New Bid to Stifle Iran Aid to Syria

Thursday, January 19th, 2012

The Wall Street Journal

01/19/2012

By JAY SOLOMON And ALAN CULLISON

U.S. officials have uncovered an effort by Iran to help Syria mask its oil exports and evade an American and European embargo, in a potent new sign of Tehran’s campaign to bolster Syrian President Bashar al-Assad as his regime cracks down on public opposition.

American officials investigating the Iranian operation said it is designed to quietly ship Syrian crude oil to Iran, where it can be sold on the international market, with revenue going back to Damascus.

Transit records document one such shipment, involving more than 91,000 metric tons of crude, which took place last month.

“The oil shipment to Iran was designed to evade the sanctions that have been imposed on Syria,” said a senior U.S. Treasury Department official familiar with the case.

In response, the Treasury Department has begun targeting the insurance and registration of international tankers shipping Syrian oil overseas.

Concerns aren’t limited to Iran. Washington and its allies are also intensifying the scrutiny of maritime and air traffic moving into Syria from Russia, as Moscow has publicly committed to continue arming Mr. Assad’s security forces.

This month, Cyprus intercepted a St. Petersburg-based ship, the Chariot, that was moving four containers of munitions bound for the Syrian port of Tartus, according to Cypriot officials. Cyprus eventually released the ship after assurances from its Russian owners that it wouldn’t complete the delivery, according to Cypriot officials.

But Moscow this week confirmed the arms shipment was made. The ship’s owner, the Russian freight company Balchart, declined to comment.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Wednesday defended the arms shipment from Russia to Syria, rebuffing growing American and European calls for Russia to comply with the U.S. and European Union arms embargo on Damascus. “We do not feel we have to explain or justify anything because we are not violating any international agreements or U.N. Security Council resolutions,” Mr. Lavrov said in Moscow. “We are only trading with Syria in items that aren’t banned by international law.”

U.S. and Russian officials are negotiating a Security Council resolution to address the violence in Syria. The U.S. and Europe are pushing for an arms embargo and financial sanctions on the Assad regime as part of the resolution. Moscow has opposed such a measure.

A spokesman for the Iranian embassy at the U.N. said there are no international sanctions on Syria that Tehran needs to respect. He also said that outside powers, not Iran, have been feeding the conflict inside Syria by shipping in arms. “Syria is an independent country, and Iran respects its sovereignty,” said the spokesman. “Iran believes that Syrians have the right to self-determination free from any foreign intervention.”

Russia and Iran historically have been the Assad family’s closest allies. Moscow is Syria’s largest arms supplier and maintains a naval base in Tartus. Syria and Iran closely coordinate in funding and arming the militant groups Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in the Palestinian territories.

The U.S. and EU have focused on drying up Mr. Assad’s oil revenues ever since Syrian security forces began a military crackdown against opposition political activists in March that has left thousands dead.

In the past, Damascus generated roughly one-third of its revenue from oil sales to Europe, according to official Syrian statistics. But its shipments have been crippled by U.S. and EU sanctions that ban the financing or insuring of Syrian oil exports, industry executives say.

Mr. Assad’s government has spoken about reorienting its oil sales to Asian countries, such as China and India, to generate earnings.

In late November, U.S. officials said they had gathered information that showed Iran was stepping in to aid Syria with its oil trade. U.S. and European officials believe Tehran is assisting Damascus with its military crackdown by providing arms, software, training and intelligence.

U.S. officials and shipping executives said Iran, through a Dubai-based company, Sea Enterprises Ltd., chartered a Greek-owned tanker, the Mire, to ship more than 91,000 metric tons of crude. The Mire loaded the oil from Nov. 19 to 21 at the Syrian port of Baniyas with the intention of delivering it to Iran’s Ras Bahregan oil terminal, the officials and executives said.

The Treasury Department was able to get the Mire’s insurance and registration pulled after telling company executives that the ship was carrying a product sanctioned by the U.S. and EU.

The Mire, like many international oil tankers, uses American insurance, is registered in Liberia and flies under a Liberian flag. The Liberian International Ship and Corporate Registry ordered the Mire’s owners to desist from delivering the oil to Iran, said Scott Bergeron, CEO of the Liberian company.

But the owners ignored the order and discharged the shipment in Iran before eventually returning to the United Arab Emirates. Efforts to reach Sea Enterprises were unsuccessful.

Liberia issued a notice of violation against the Mire’s owner, Eurotankers Inc. of Greece, in accordance with Liberian civil-penalty procedures. The company declined to comment.

“We are seeing more and more action taken by both the U.S. and the EU against shipping interests,” Mr. Bergeron said.

Spokesmen for the Syrian government declined to comment. U.S. officials said their strategy of targeting Syria’s shipping was drawn from Washington’s wider financial war against Iran—and say that Iran’s ability to provide financial assistance to Syria is increasingly constrained by the growing sanctions placed on Tehran. Planned EU sanctions on Iran’s oil exports could tighten the screws.

Damascus has been increasingly reliant on oceangoing vessels for arms shipments, because neighbors have been making air shipments difficult, according to U.S. and European officials.

Turkey has been denying overflight rights, halting the shipments to Syria from Iran, according to these officials. As an alternative, Syria has also tried to fly arms in from the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad in Eastern Europe, but those flights have been blocked by neighboring Lithuania.

“The air is no longer an option for the Syrians to get weapons,” said Hugh Griffiths of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, an international arms watchdog. “So it makes sense to go after the sea shipping and the insurance companies.” It is easy to use the insurance companies as a pressure point, Mr. Griffiths said, because most of the insurance companies are based in the EU or the Caribbean.

 

 

 

 

 

Iran Plotting to Kill Its Own President, Others

Wednesday, January 18th, 2012

PJ Media

01/18/2012

By: Reza Kahlili

The Revolutionary Guards are plotting to kill President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his followers, sources within Ahmadinejad’s camp charged Tuesday.

Meanwhile, an assassination force has been formed to also eliminate those Iranians who oppose the supreme leader in the event of war breaking out between the United States and Iran over sanctions imposed to thwart Iran’s nuclear weapons program.

Raha Press, the Iranian online media outlet close to Ahmadinejad, reported that a Guards plot code-named Hadian Basir, under the guidance of Hossein Taeb, the commander of the Guards Intelligence section, is under way to eliminate Ahmadinejad and his camp.

Taeb, who has had a long history of animosity against Ahmadinejad, is among those conservatives loyal to Iran’s supreme leader, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. He also is among those calling Ahmadinejad and his camp the “The Seditionists.”

Khamenei loyalists called Ahmadinejad and his followers “The Seditionists” after a rift between the two came to light several months ago when Ahmadinejad dismissed Intelligence Minister Heydar Moslehi. Khamenei subsequently reinstated Moslehi. The intelligence minister had presented an extensive report on Ahmadinejad’s political and economic activities to the supreme leader, indicating also that Ahmadinejad was struggling for control of that ministry.

Guards intelligence has now infiltrated the Intelligence Ministry and has taken over the direction of the country’s intelligence activities, Raha Press said.

The Guards were training special handpicked forces as recently as three months ago in a city in northern Iran to eliminate Ahmadinejad, his close ally Rahim Meshaei and others in his camp, Raha Press said. It promised to release documents supporting its claims in the near future.

Meanwhile on Tuesday, a website for Iranian military insiders revealed that a “Removal Committee” under the orders of Major-General Hassan Firoozabadi, the head of the Iranian armed forces, has been formed at the Revolutionary Guards Sar’ Allah base. SepahOnline reports the agenda of this committee is based on the possibility of war with the United States. Its mission includes sabotage and assassination before the war, during the war and after the war.

The activities also include “accidental” deaths of opposition members, “suspicious deaths” of those commanders within the Iranian armed forces opposing war and terrorizing known personalities not in line with Khamenei, then blaming it all on the regime’s enemies. Bombings in public places would again be blamed on the enemies to grow fear among the populace and consolidate power within loyal forces.

The personnel are being chosen and instructed for this secret mission at the Guards’ Sar’ Allah base, which is in charge of the security of the capital and serves as one of the most important intelligence and security bases within the Revolutionary Guards.

Reza Kahlili is a pseudonym for a former CIA operative in Iran’s Revolutionary Guards and the author of the award winning book, A Time to Betray. He is a senior Fellow with EMPact America and teaches at the U.S. Department of Defense’s Joint Counterintelligence Training Academy (JCITA).

 

 

China criticizes U.S. sanctions against Chinese company

Sunday, January 15th, 2012

RadioZamaneh

Sun, 01/15/2012

China has criticized new U.S. sanctions against Zhuhai Zhenrong, China’s largest exporter of petroleum products to Iran.

Reuters reports that a spokesman for China’s Foreign Ministry said on Sunday that it’s not logical to slap sanctions on a Chinese company on the basis of a domestic U.S. law, nor does it correspond to the UN resolution regarding Iran’s nuclear program.

China expressed “dissatisfaction and firm opposition” to the U.S. decision regarding Zhuhai Zhenrong.

China had previously denounced recent U.S. sanctions against Iran’s Central Bank.

On January 13, the U.S. announced sanctions against three international companies for their dealings with Iran, including the Chinese company Zhuhai Zhenrong. The three companies are banned from dealing with the United States and are barred from receiving loans from U.S. banks.

The U.S. has justified its sanctions as a way to stop Iran from building nuclear military capacity. Iran insists, however, that it has no military ambitions behind its nuclear activities.

 

US acts to hold Israel back from striking Iran. Their intel agencies at odds

Saturday, January 14th, 2012

DEBKAfile Exclusive Report January 14, 2012

The bombing attack in Tehran which killed Iranian nuclear scientist Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan last Wednesday, Jan. 11, generated an angry phone call from US President Barack Obama to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu the next day, DEBKAfile’s Washington and intelligence sources report.  Washington is increasingly concerned, the Wall Street Journal reported Saturday, that Israel is preparing to strike Iran’s nuclear sites over US objections and has bolstered the defenses of US facilities in the region in case of a conflict.

Obama, Defense and Secretary Leon Panetta and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have been sending private messages to their Israel contacts warning them about the dire consequences of a strike, the paper reports. Top US armed forces chief Gen. Martin Dempsey will visit Israel next week.
DEBKAfile’s exclusive sources report that the differences between the US and Israel surfaced before the tough Obama-Netanyahu conversation last Thursday. Political, military and intelligence officials privately voiced resentment over the strong and unusual condemnation the White House and Secretary Clinton issued over the death of the Iranian nuclear scientist.

By denying “absolutely” any US involvement in the killing, the administration implicitly pointed the finger at Israel – an unusual act in relations between two friendly governments, especially when both face a common issue as sensitive as a nuclear-armed Iran.
Obama seemed to suspect that Israel staged the killing to torpedo yet another US secret effort to avoid a military confrontation with Iran through back channel contacts with Tehran, while the administration’s extreme condemnation is seen as tying in with its all-out campaign to hold Israel back from a unilateral strike.

As part of this campaign, the Foreign Policy publication ran an “investigative report” Friday, Jan. 13, the point of which was to show that US and Israeli undercover agencies have been at odds for years after what was called a Mossad “false flag” operation. “Two US intelligence officers” are said to have revealed to the publication that in 2007 and 2008, Israeli Mossad officers posing as US intelligence agents with American passports recruited terrorist group Jundallah operatives for covert attacks in Iran.

This Pakistan-based Baluchi extremist group was described as utterly shunned by the CIA.
The weekly’s sources said they were “stunned by the brazenness of Mossad’s recruiting activities…under the nose of US intelligence officers, most notably in London.”

They implied that Jundallah were sure they had been recruited by US intelligence. But so was Tehran. The Israeli “false flag” program was therefore accused of putting American agents at risk.

A “serving US intelligence officer” told the paper that President George W. Bush when informed of this episode “went absolutely ballistic.”

DEBKAfile adds: At the time of this alleged operation, Ehud Olmert was prime minister of Israel and Meir Dagan director of the Mossad. While the Bush administration is not known to have ever taken it up with Israel, Barack Obama decided to cool US intelligence cooperation with Israel on the Iranian issue when he took office in 2009.

Foreign Policy in its tendentious and selective report presents Mossad as the sole recruiter of Jundallah for sabotage and hit operations for defeating Iran’s drive for a nuclear bomb. It omits the slightest mention of the fact that US intelligence started using Jundallah for such operations from early 2005 with ample US-dollar funding approved personally by President Bush.
Our Washington and intelligence sources note that the report appeared two days after the Iranian nuclear scientist was killed and the day after Obama took Netanyahu to task. It had two objective: to show that US is not responsible for all the covert operations of recent months against Iran’s nuclear targets and, secondly, to demonstrate that Washington means to continue harassing and pressuring Israel by every means to hold it back from a military operation against Iran.

 

EU says Iranian oil sanctions not delayed

Saturday, January 14th, 2012

RadioZamaneh

Sat, 01/14/2012

The European Union has dismissed reports that EU sanctions on Iranian oil have been postponed, calling the reports nonsense.

Xinhua reports that Michael Mann, a spokesman for the EU Foreign and Security Policy High Representative, denied media speculation that the EU sanctions on Iranian oil have been delayed for six months, saying no agreement has even been reached on the terms of the sanctions, so they can’t possibly be delayed.

Previously, a number of European diplomats had told the media that a six-month delay had been agreed upon for implementing sanctions against Iran.

The reports indicated that Greece, already grappling with economic crisis and debt, is one of the chief opponents of oil sanctions.

Italy, facing similar economic problems, also resists such a plan.

Both Greece and Italy are Europe’s chief buyers of Iranian crude, and a large part of their energy demand is dependent on Iranian oil imports.

However, Mann maintained that the issue was still under debate, and therefore it was “nonsense” to claim the plan was delayed.

He added that the EU Foreign Minister will have further discussions on sanctions against Iran at the next meeting of EU foreign ministers on January 23.

Iran exports 450,000 barrels of oil to Europe each day, which represents 18 percent of its oil exports. Italy, Spain, and Greece, the three most economically embattled European countries, are the main recipients of this oil, consuming 180,000 barrels, 160,000 barrels and 100,000 barrels respectively.

China and India have refused to boycott Iranian oil. Japan had indicated that it supported the U.S. initiative to ban Iranian oil, but it later announced that it needs more time to examine the issue.

Russia has denounced efforts to sanction Iranian oil, accusing the U.S. of trying to bring about a regime change in Iran.

 

The Ayatollah and the Pearl Harbor moment

Friday, January 13th, 2012

Asharq

01/13/2012

By Amir Taheri

The United States’ global leadership is “finished” and capitalism is “on the verge of collapse.” The time has come for the Islamic Republic to “lead mankind on a new path”.

This is the message that, this week, Iran’s top two leaders were trying to spread at home and abroad.

Inside Iran, “Supreme Guide” Ali Khamenei travelled to Qom on his sixth visit in a year, to mobilise the regime’s dwindling clerical base.

Recalling the Prophet’s Ghazavat victories, Khamenei boasted that he was “on the threshold of new Badr and Kheybar moments.”

Thousands of miles away in Caracas, the Venezuelan capital, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was boasting about how Latin America “once the backyard of the American Great Satan” was fast becoming “ the advance post of global revolution” led by Iran.

Commenting on the visit, the daily Kayhan newspaper in Tehran went further: ”Today, Latin America is Iran’s backyard,” it asserted in an editorial Tuesday.

The delusion that the US is about to collapse and that its leadership role will devolve to Iran has become a major theme of Khomeinist propaganda.

It is the centre of discourse in seminars, some attended by professional anti-Americans from Europe and the United States, and a favourite topic for editorials in the state-owned media.

Almost every day, the official news agency features an interview with some “international expert”, from places as far apart as Russia and Bolivia, claiming that the days of the “Great Satan” are numbered.

Perhaps influenced by such “experts”, generals from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) routinely claim that they are looking for an opportunity to “teach America a lesson.”

One effect of this escalation in Khomeinist hubris is the virtual disappearance of Israel from official hate propaganda.

There was a time when “wiping Israel off the map” was the surest way for every scoundrel’s 15 minutes of fame.

Today, Israel is regarded as too insignificant an enemy for the mighty Khomeinist empire. The scoundrels have jumped many rungs higher to talk of wiping the US off the map.

Those officials less affected by hubris, offer a more moderate analysis. Foreign Minister Ali-Akbar Salehi, for example, says that, with US on the way out, Iran could share global leadership, notably with China and Russia, forging a “new world order”.

Propagandists disguised as academics are building an industry based on claims that the US has become a “paper tiger” and that anyone with an ounce of courage could twist its tail with impunity.

Papers are published on how the US, under President Barrack Obama, “ran away” from Iraq and is preparing to “run away” from Afghanistan. Much is made of the fact that Obama wrote letters to Khamenei without getting a reply.

By any account, the US does have the wherewithal to defend its interests. It is spending over $700 billion, almost as much as the entire Iranian gross national product (GDP), on defence. The American military expenditure is double the total expenditure of China, Russia, India, Japan, Brazil, France and the United Kingdom.

The US has the world’s only blue-water navy capable of operating in all oceans. (Last week, it was the US navy, not the IRGC’s world-conquering boats, which freed the captured Iranian fishermen held by Somali pirates for months.)

The small portion of the United States’ air and naval assets concentrated around Iran and nearby regions provide many times more firepower than the “Supreme Guide” could muster.

For Iran, provoking a military clash with the US is a bad bargain, to say the least.

The assumption that the US is “finished” as a major power is equally wrong.

Whatever happens, the US is the world’s third largest country in terms of territory and population. It is also the world’s biggest economy with a GDP of around $15 trillion, almost a quarter of total global GDP.

Whilst economic and military power helped build America’s leadership position, that position is not the fruit of raw power alone. For more than a century, to different people across the globe, the US has been a cultural and political magnet of unique pull.

There are no Americans who wish to immigrate to Iran; but go to the American consulates in Dubai or Istanbul and you will see lines of American visa-seekers going round the blocks.

Americans are not rushing to buy the Iranian rial that has lost 50 per cent of its value against the dollar in the past few month.

Before the mullahs seized power one US dollar was exchanged for 70 Iranian rials. Last week, the dollar was worth 18,000 rials, whilst Iranians were queuing to buy the greenback.

Building strategy on crude anti-Americanism is both unwise and ultimately self-defeating. The course of history is strewn with the debris of anti-American dreams. In his time, Hitler forecast “the end of America” and the advent of “global Aryan leadership”. Japanese militarists sung from their own “end of America” hymn-sheets and Stalin and his successors degenerated Marxism into a crude anti-American cult. Mao Zedong was the original inventor of the term “paper tiger”, to describe America. More vulgar despots such as Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi also used anti-Americanism.

The Khomeinist version is more out of place because, as a people, Iranians are not anti-American. For decades, every opinion poll has shown that the US is more popular in Iran than it is in France or even Great Britain.

Using the delusion that the US is no longer willing to defend its interests and the interests of its allies, bellicose factions urge a military clash with the «Great Satan”. IRGC’s threat to close the Hormuz Strait was a deliberate provocation.

Such moves are dangerous for Iran and could prove deadly for the regime. They could provoke a Pearl Harbor moment rather than a Badr or Kheybar one, forcing a reluctant American public to support military action against Iran. Ideologically bankrupt, Khamenei may be pushing Iran to war.

 

 

 

 

British PM meets Saudi King, tells Al Arabiya pressure will force Iran to reconsider

Friday, January 13th, 2012

By AL ARABIYA WITH AGENCIES

Friday, 13 January 2012

Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz held talks with British Prime Minister David Cameron (L) in Riyadh. (SPA)

Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz held talks with British Prime Minister David Cameron (L) in Riyadh. (SPA)

British Prime Minister David Cameron told Al Arabiya television during a visit to Saudi Arabia on Friday that economic pressure on Iran would force it to reconsider its position.

“We support an international decision against Syria based on the Arab League,” Cameron told Al Arabiya adding that Assad has lost legitimacy.

The interview will be broadcast by Al Arabiya later.

The United States is leading an international drive to cut Iran’s oil exports, the latest in a series of sanctions imposed on Iran in an attempt to push it into negotiations on its uranium enrichment program. The West believes Iran is using the program to develop an atomic bomb, but Iran denies this, saying the project is for peaceful purposes.

Cameron met Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz earlier on Friday in his first visit to the world’s top oil exporter since taking office in 2010, according to Reuters.

The meeting comes as tensions soar between the West and Tehran, the oil-rich kingdom’s arch-rival in the Gulf.

The two leaders “discussed the importance of the UK-Saudi bilateral relationship and agreed to strengthen cooperation in a range of areas,” Cameron’s office said in a statement, according to AFP.

They “also discussed recent developments in the region, in particular their shared concerns about the situation in Syria, Iran and Yemen,” it added.

An uprising in Syria has left more than 5,000 people killed since March in a crackdown on protests against President Bashar al-Assad’s regime, according to a United Nations estimate last month.

Yemen has also been rocked by a year of unrest in which hundreds have been killed amid fears of a growing al-Qaeda influence across its southern and eastern provinces due to a weakening central government.

Cameron’s first visit to the OPEC kingpin also comes as Western governments, including Britain, have moved to step up sanctions over Iran’s controversial nuclear program, threatening an embargo on vital oil exports that has drawn an angry response from Tehran.

Iran has threatened to shut the strategic Strait of Hormuz — a chokepoint for a fifth of the world’s oil — if it is attacked or if heavy sanctions are imposed.

“The prime minister also raised our concerns about Somalia and the problems of conflict, piracy and terrorism which threaten Somalis and the wider international community,” Cameron’s office said.

“He briefed the king on the aims of next month’s London Conference on Somalia, in particular to catalyze a coordinated international effort focused on practical measures to help Somalis rebuild their country.”

Somalia has been without an effective central government since president Siad Barre was ousted in 1991 as violence, piracy and famine tear the African country.

Saudi state news agency SPA reported earlier that the two leaders discussed “regional and international developments as well as the various means of strengthening cooperation between both countries,” without elaborating.

The meeting was attended by top Saudi officials.

Britain has been seeking to strengthen ties with oil-rich Saudi Arabia, a major market for Western arms deals, and boost exports to its largest Middle East trading partner.

Annual bilateral trade is worth 15 billion pounds ($23 billion), while Saudi investments in Britain amount to more than 62 billion pounds.

 

Amnesty International USA Asks Supporters to Act Now to Halt the Execution of U.S. Citizen in Iran

Friday, January 13th, 2012

(New York) — Amnesty International USA is asking supporters to take action to halt the execution of a U.S. citizen, Amir Hekmati, who was sentenced to death in Iran after being convicted of spying for the C.I.A.

Amnesty International is urging supporters to contact Ayatollah Sayed Ali Khamenei, Iran’s Supreme Leader, and other authorities, to stop the execution. Supporters can take action online: http://takeaction.amnestyusa.org/.

Hekmati, a former Marine, was not allowed access to his family or allowed consular assistance from the Swiss (the United States has no representatives in Iran) and was only given access to a court-appointed lawyer for the first time on the day of his trial.

A confession made by Hekmati was broadcast on Iranian state television in December and used as “evidence” against him at trial.

Iran has a history of using confessions obtained by coercion or torture to undermine the right to a fair trial.

The death sentence comes at a time of heightened tensions between Iran and the United States.

“This is the first time since Iran’s revolution 33 years ago that a U.S. citizen has been sentenced to death in Iran,” said Elise Auerbach,  specialist on Iran for Amnesty International USA.   “The time to act is now to condemn this sentence, which was handed down following a patently unfair trial.”

Iran has officially acknowledged executing 17 people already this year, although Amnesty International has received information suggesting at least 39 people may have been put to death in the first week of 2012 alone.

In December 2011, Amnesty International highlighted a massive wave of executions in Iran throughout 2011, with over 600 people being put to death between the beginning of 2011 and November. Most of these were for drug-related offenses.

Amnesty International is a Nobel Peace Prize-winning grassroots activist organization with more than 2.8 million supporters, activists and volunteers in more than 150 countries campaigning for human rights worldwide. The organization investigates and exposes abuses, educates and mobilizes the public, and works to protect people wherever justice, freedom, truth and dignity are denied.

# # #

For more information, please visit: www.amnestyusa.org.

Bad Behavior has blocked 4205 access attempts in the last 7 days.