Jihad

...now browsing by tag

 
 

DID IRAN BRIBE CHINA TO TORPEDO U.N. VOTE?

Sunday, February 5th, 2012

02/05/2012

WND

by AARON KLEIN

JERUSALEM – According to a senior Egyptian security official speaking to WND, Iran offered China a deal to purchase oil at a cheaper price in exchange for vetoing a U.N. resolution today that called on Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to resign.

Assad’s regime has been facing a violent insurgency. The Syrian president’s security forces were accused of a massacre today shelling the insurgent stronghold of Homs, reportedly the bloodiest single day in the 11-month uprising.

Syrian officials, however, say well-armed Islamic extremists have been shooting at their forces and deliberately drawing retaliatory fire into civilian populations.

Russia and China torpedoed today’s resolution at the U.N. Security Council that endorsed an Arab League plan for Assad to hand power to a deputy to make way for a transition towards democracy.

Reuters reported that Russia complained the draft resolution was an improper and biased attempt at “regime change” in Syria, which is Moscow’s sole major Middle East ally, an important buyer of Russian arms exports and host to a Russian naval base.

Indeed, last month WND reported Russian military experts were inside Syria helping Assad’s regime face down the protests, including advising Syrian forces on how to quell rioting in Damascus and around the presidential compound.

WND also reported in December that Russian military technicians were in Syria to inspect the country’s missile and army installations amid Syrian fears a Turkish-backed NATO military campaign may try to target the Assad regime.

Meanwhile, President Obama today decried the “relentless brutality” of Assad’s regime, calling the reported killing of 200 people in Homs by government shelling an “unspeakable assault,” while urging Assad to step down.

Lost in much of the media reporting on events in Homs is Syria’s claim that eight of its security forces were killed as well as many so-called terrorists, who Syria says provoked the attack.

Syria further disputes the claim that over 200 civilians were killed.

A Syrian official told WND an “armed terrorist group” first attacked a security post in Palmyra, in the Homs countryside. The Syrian official also accused the purported terrorist group of targeting civilians, saying Syrian forces found and dismantled several explosive devices placed in civilian locations in and near Homs.

This tactic was actually confirmed by a leaked Arab League report, posted by the Anonymous group, which says Arab League monitors several times witnessed an “armed entity” provoking Syrian forces and placing civilian lives in danger.

The classified report states: “The Mission determined that there is an armed entity that is not mentioned in the protocol. … In some zones, this armed entity reacted by attacking Syrian security forces and citizens, causing the Government to respond with further violence. In the end, innocent citizens pay the price for those actions with life and limb.”

Aaron Klein is WND’s senior staff reporter and Jerusalem bureau chief. He also hosts “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio” on New York’s WABC Radio. His latest book is the N.Y. Times best-selling, “The Manchurian President: Barack Obama’s Ties to

 

Iranians bemoan sanctions hardship as vote approaches

Sunday, February 5th, 2012

Sun Feb 5, 2012 8:03am EST

(Reuters) – Each day that he struggles to buy food for his family, vegetable seller Hasan Sharafi shoulders part of the burden of Iran’s defiance of the West over its nuclear programme. He can hardly bear it.

“Prices are going up every day, life is expensive. I buy chicken or meat once per month. I used to buy it twice per week,” the father of four said in Iran’s central city of Isfahan.

“Sometimes I want to kill myself. I feel desperate. I do not earn enough to feed my children.”

With just a month to go before a parliamentary election, Iran has been hit hard in recent months by new U.S. and European economic sanctions over its nuclear programme, which Tehran says is peaceful but the West says is aimed at making a bomb.

In conversations in towns and cities across Iran, people complained of rapidly deteriorating economic conditions, likely to be the main issue in an election that exposes divisions between President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and hardline opponents.

The last time Iranians voted, in a 2009 presidential election, Ahmadinejad’s disputed victory triggered eight months of violent street demonstrations. The authorities successfully put down that uprising by force, but since then the Arab Spring has demonstrated the vulnerability of governments in the region to uprisings fuelled by anger over economic difficulty.

“My father lost his job because the factory he used to work for 30 years was closed last month. I am so pessimistic. Why is this happening to us?” lamented mathematics student Behnaz in the northern city of Rasht.

“I don’t know whether the prices are rising because of sanctions. The only thing that I know is that our lives are ruined. I have no hope for the future.”

Iran’s leaders deny that sanctions are having an economic impact, but are also calling for solidarity in the face of them. In a defiant speech on Friday, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei told Iranians sanctions would make them stronger.

“Such sanctions will benefit us. They will make us more self reliant,” he said in a televised address marking the anniversary of Iran’s 1979 revolution. “Sanctions will not have any impact on our determination to continue our nuclear course.”

BREAD ON THE TABLE

Such rhetoric resonates with some Iranians, who say they are willing to endure pain to defend a nuclear programme that has become a symbol of national pride.

“America uses the nuclear issue as an excuse to replace our regime with a puppet regime to control our energy resources. But we will not let them. Nuclear technology is our right and I fully support our leaders’ view. Death to America,” said student Mohammad Reza Khorrami in the northern town of Chalous.

But the West is hoping sanctions will turn ordinary Iranians against their leaders, and there are clear signs of discontent. When you ask Iranians about the nuclear issue, many seem to see it as a distraction from the real question of economic hardship.

“I am not a politician. I don’t care about the nuclear dispute. Soon, I might not be able to afford food and other basic needs of my children,” said Mitra Zarrabi, a schoolteacher and mother of three.

“What is the nuclear dispute? Don’t waste my time asking irrelevant questions,” said 62-year-old peddler Reza Zohrabi in a marketplace overflowing with imported Chinese goods in the city of Kashan. “I’m not interested in talking about politics and the nuclear issue. I have to find ways to put bread on my family’s table.”

Iranian authorities say 15 percent of the country’s workforce is unemployed. Many formal jobs pay a pittance, meaning the true figure of people without adequate work to support themselves is probably far higher.

Hemmat Ghorban, 32, sits in a square in Mashhad city with a group of men, waiting to get work as day construction workers.

“I used to sell fruit in a small shop in Zanjan city,” said Ghorban, who was forced to close his shop because of the increasing rent and high price of materials.

“Today I earned nothing. How am I going to support my family? Soon my family will be homeless. Sometimes I go without work for three or four days.”

The new sanctions include measures signed into law by President Barack Obama on New Year’s Eve that would ban any institution dealing with Iran’s central bank from the U.S. financial system.

If fully implemented, the law would effectively make it impossible for countries to pay for Iranian oil. Washington is imposing the sanctions gradually and offering waivers to prevent chaos on international energy markets, but countries seeking those permits are expected to reduce trade with Iran over time.

The European Union, which collectively bought about a fifth of Iran’s 2.6 million barrels per day of oil exports last year, has announced it will halt Iranian crude imports. Other countries are scrambling to comply with U.S. and EU measures.

Since the sanctions have only begun to bite, far greater pain is looming. Oil is 60 percent of Iran’s economy. Much of its food and animal feed are imported, and many of its factories assemble goods from imported parts.

Already, ships bringing grain have been turning back from Iranian ports because Tehran cannot pay suppliers: an agricultural consultancy said maize imports from Ukraine – a major source of animal feed – fell 40 percent last month.

China, Iran’s biggest trade partner, cut its purchases of Iranian oil by half in January and February this year, and is seeking steeper discounts for the oil that it does buy. Turkey wants a discounted price for gas.

Such discounts mean that even if it does manage to thwart sanctions and find buyers for its energy exports, Iran’s revenue will be hurt. It relies on oil exports to buy goods to feed its 74 million people and pay for subsidies to keep prices low.

People have been queuing at banks to withdraw their savings and buy hard currency, even though banks have increased interest rates on savings to 20 percent from 12 percent.

Currency exchange shops are refusing to sell dollars at official rates, forcing people to the black market where the rial has lost more than half its value in the past two months.

For those who link the hardship to international sanctions, the most vivid example is neighboring Iraq, where an embargo imposed between 1991 and the U.S. invasion in 2003 reduced a wealthy oil exporting country to dire poverty.

“I don’t want Iran to become like Iraq before America’s invasion. With the sanctions, soon we will have problems finding essential goods and even medicine,” said 31-year-old teacher Rokhsareh Sharafoleslam in Chalous.

Reformist candidates are largely barred from standing in Iran’s parliamentary election, which will put Ahmadinejad – known in the West as a hardliner – against opponents that are even more conservative. The election will largely be a referendum on Ahmadinejad’s economic policies, which his opponents blame for the economic disarray.

For decades, Iran has used its oil wealth to provide the public with lavish subsidies for goods. Ahmadinejad has been cutting those subsidies, replacing them with direct payments to citizens of around $110 a month for a family of four.

His hardline political opponents say the payments are a bribe to win support from voters and have fueled inflation.

Analyst Hamid Farahvashian said the payments could nevertheless win voter support for the president.

“The lower-income people in villages and small towns can live on that money. So, Ahmadinejad’s camp basically will win their votes in parliamentary polls.”

INFLATION, UNEMPLOYMENT

Iran’s annual official inflation rate is running around 20 percent but economists and some lawmakers say it is really around 50 percent. Prices for bread, dairy, rice, vegetables and cooking fuel have soared. A traditional Iranian loaf of “sangak” bread costs 30 percent more than a few months ago.

“We are worried and afraid. I feel depressed when I think about future of my children. What might happen if America and other countries impose further sanctions on Iran?” said a housewife in Kermanshah, who declined to give her name.

Reza Khaleghi, who owns a small grocery store in the central city of Karaj near Tehran, said gloomily: “Because of sanctions prices are increasing almost every day. The purchasing power of people is nose-diving.”

Since 2010, subsidy cutbacks have tripled the price of electricity, water and natural gas used for factories, cooking and heating homes. Soaring costs caused the closure of at least 1,800 small factories in Tehran province alone, according to Iranian media.

On a bus from Mashhad to the nearby town of Quchan, people spoke of little else but inflation.

“Prices are increasing by the hour. My husband and I cannot afford starting a family as life is so expensive,” said Mahla Aref, a government employee.

Small businesses say they are struggling to operate as the falling currency raises the cost of goods.

“Business is almost dead. People only buy essential basics,” said Khosro Sadegi, who plans to shut down his electronics and appliance shop in the town of Sari.

“Because of rial fluctuations we have to increase prices and people just don’t buy anything anymore.”

(Editing by Peter Graff)

 

Iran Vows Retaliation Against Countries Used As Base For Attack

Sunday, February 5th, 2012

RFE/RL

February 05, 2012

Iran has said it would retaliate against any country that is used to launch an attack on it.

The semi-official Fars news agency quotes a senior commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, General Hossein Salami, as saying that “any place where enemy offensive operations against the Islamic Republic of Iran originate will be the target.”

He did not elaborate.

The United States and Israel have not ruled out a military strike against Iran if diplomacy fails to resolve the standoff over Iran’s nuclear program.

Iran says its program is purely peaceful, rather than aimed at developing weapons.

Compiled from agency reports

 

Iran begins war games in Strait of Hormuz

Sunday, February 5th, 2012

02/05/2012

DEUTSCHE WELLE

Iran has begun military exercises, planned weeks in advance, in the narrow Strait of Hormuz. The exercises come after the West sent more warships to the region amid on-going tensions over Iran’s nuclear program.

The hard-line Iranian Revolutionary Guards began naval maneuvers in the Strait of Hormuz on Saturday, more than a week after the western Allies dispatched more warships to the strategically critical choke point in the Persian Gulf.

Iran plans to conduct war games in the strait for the next month, coming at a time of already heightened tension with the US and its European allies over the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program. At the end of January, Washington deployed the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln to the region, which was accompanied by two British and French warships.

Tehranhas threatened to blockade the Strait of Hormuz, the route for one-fifth of the world’s crude oil, in response to EU and US sanctions against its oil exports. Washington has vowed to keep the Persian Gulf open to international trade.

Oil sanctions

Iran’s oil minister said on Saturday that his country would retaliate against “some” European countries for the EU oil embargo. The EU accounted for 25 percent of Iranian crude oil sales in the third quarter of 2011.

 

Autor charles taylor Portfolio ansehen  Bildnummer 9406323  Land USA  Repräsentative Kategorie Gegenstände  Andere Objekte  Konzeptionelle Kategorie Reisen  Mittlerer Osten  Iran  Keywords  afghane arabe atlas auf ausbilden ausbildung business erdball erde focus geographie gittermuster global grafik iraq karte kontinent krief landen lehren lernen makro meer muslim norden ost planentarium politik politisch reise reisen schließen schule schulkind sphäre staat süden terrorismus terrorist tour tourism triplotanien urlaub welt westen  Tensions are rising in the region

“Our oil exports will certainly be cut to some European countries,” said Oil Minister Rostam Qasemi, according to the Fars news agency.  “We will decide about other European countries later.”

Italy, Greece and Spain – currently at the center of the eurozone’s economic crisis – are major European importers of Iranian oil. They have until July to find alternative oil sources.

German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said on Saturday that the EU’s decision to expand its sanctions against Tehran makes “very clear that Europe is not willing to allow for a nuclear armed Iran.”

Westerwelle, sitting on a panel with US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at the Munich Security Conference, said that Europe “is convinced a nuclear-armed Iran is not only a danger to the security of that region, but is a danger to the whole world.”

Israeli pressure

On the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference in Germany, Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon told Reuters news agency that Western sanctions had to be imposed quickly and decisively, warning that “weeks and months can make a difference.”

 

Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Daniel Ayalon attends an interview with Reuters at the 48th Conference on Security Policy in Munich February 3, 2012. REUTERS/Michaela Rehle (GERMANY - Tags: POLITICS)Ayalon says time is of the essence

Ayalon also expressed concern that Iran may be beefing up its facilities to protect its nuclear program.

“We see them (Iran) also trying to expedite hardening their installations so they will reach an immunity zone, where some action may not be as effective, and this is why the time is so much of the essence,” he said.

The Washington Post reported on Thursday that US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is concerned that Israel could launch a military strike on Iran in the next few months.

Amid the speculation that Israel may be preparing for such a strike, German Foreign Minister Westerwelle said that Europe’s goal is to avoid a military conflict and is “warning against escalation.”

slk/acb (AP, Reuters)

 

Last steps taken to summon president to Parliament

Sunday, February 5th, 2012

RadioZamaneh

Sun, 02/05/2012
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

Iranian MP Mostafa Rezahosseini has announced that the final step has been taken to summon Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for questioning.

Rezahosseini said: “The report prepared by the initiators of the motion to question the president has been delivered to the Speaker of Parliament.”

The Mehr News Agency reports that the report was submitted to Ali Larijani today, and the regulations give the president one month to prepare himself for an appearance in Parliament to respond to MPs’ questions.

Previously, government representatives appeared in Parliament to be questioned by MPs regarding a number of irregularities. Mehr reports that the MPs were said to be unsatisfied with all of the administration’s responses.

The questions covered a range of issues from irregularities in funding for the Tehran Subway system to inaccurate unemployment statistics to the president’s withdrawal from attending to his duties.

The motion to question Ahmadinejad got into gear last summer. The motion has been met with many obstacles, revealing serious divisions in the Islamic Republic establishment.

 

Rights groups make global appeal for help with Iran

Saturday, February 4th, 2012

RadioZamaneh

Sat, 02/04/2012

International rights groups have called on the global community to take a firmer stance in its talks with Iran on respect for human rights.

In a joint statement, Reporters Without Borders, the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and the Iranian League for the Defence of Human Rights have denounced the “unacceptable treatment that imprisoned journalists and netizens receive at the hands of the Revolutionary Guards.”

The statement denounces the Iranian judiciary for its death sentences for Saeed Malekpour, a computer specialist and Canadian citizen, Vahid Asghari and Ahmadreza Hashempour, two netizens and IT students, and Mehdi Alizadeh, a website developer and humorist

The statement claims that these four netizens “are the victims of machinations by the Centre for the Surveillance of Organized Crime, an entity that was created illegally by the Revolutionary Guards in 2008. “

These prisoners have been forced to submit to videotaped confessions, in which they admit to “misleading Iranian youth through pornographic and anti-religious sites” and “receiving funds from the U.S. and Israel.”

The detainees have been kept in solitary confinement, in some cases for up to one year. According to the rights groups, the “coerced confessions” were used against them in their trails, while their lawyers were denied access to their clients’ files and even to the clients themselves.

Vahid Asghari and Saeed Malekpour have written at length to the judges regarding the pressure and torture they have been subjected to in prison.

The rights groups write: “We call on the international community to intercede directly with the Iranian authorities on behalf of these four netizens and to request the acquittal and release of all imprisoned journalists and bloggers,” adding that “the issue of respect for fundamental rights must at the same time be raised during ongoing economic and scientific discussions.”

The three international human rights groups also highlighted the plight of Iran’s opposition leaders, who have been under house arrest by Islamic Republic authorities for almost a year. The groups write that they “support the appeal that 39 political prisoners, journalists and intellectuals issued on 25 January, calling for the release of all prisoners of conscience including the leaders of the protests against President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s disputed re-election.”

The statement asserts that MirHosein Mousavi, Mehdi Karroubi and Zahra Rahnavard have been deprived of all their rights for close to year, as they’ve been held in complete isolation without any official charges brought against them.

 

China refuses to join the sanctions bandwagon

Saturday, February 4th, 2012

RadioZamaneh

Sat, 02/04/2012

China has announced once more that it will not join with the West in imposing sanctions on Iran, emphasizing that talks and cooperation are the only correct and effective path to resolving nuclear disputes with the Islamic Republic.

The Xinhua News Agency reports that Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao told German Chancellor Angela Merkel that the use of force would create confusion and chaos in the Middle East and the world, which is in no one’s interest. Merkel was in China to lobby about Europe’s financial health but she also urged Beijing to help persuade Tehran to refrain from developing nuclear weapons.

Wen added that China will only support a return to negotiations with Iran.

China is one of Iran’s significant trade partners, receiving 10 percent of its oil imports from the country.

Both China and Russia have refused to join the recent wave of sanctions on Iran. It was prompted by the International Atomic Energy Agency’s latest report, which indicated that Iran’s nuclear program might have a military component.

The European Union and the United States have laid sanctions against Iran’s Central Bank, and most recently the EU has begun an embargo on Iranian petroleum products.

Russia has accused the West of using sanctions to bring about a regime change in Iran.

Iran insists that its nuclear program is peaceful and refuses to stop uranium enrichment, which it says it must do to provide fuel for its reactors.

 

Iran mass producing anti-ship cruise missile: TV

Saturday, February 4th, 2012

02/04/2012

AP –  Iran has begun mass production of an anti-ship cruise missile, state television’s website said on Saturday.

The Zafar missile, as it is dubbed in the report, “is a short-range, anti-ship cruise missile capable of destroying small- and medium-sized targets with high precision.”

It can be mounted on speed boats and other light vessels, can withstand electronic warfare, and is able to fly in low altitudes to avoid detection, the report said.

Iran has a fleet of speed boats that often challenge US and allied warships in the Gulf.

The vessels are usually controlled by the elite Revolutionary Guards and can be equipped with missiles.

The Islamic republic says it has a wide range of missiles. It says some are capable of striking targets inside Israel as well as Middle Eastern military bases of its other main archfoe, the United States.

Tehran regularly boasts about developing missiles having substantial range and capabilities, but Western military experts cast doubt on its claims.

Iran’s military said in January that it could close the strategic Strait of Hormuz in the Gulf, through which a third of global marine oil traffic passes, if it is attacked.

Iranian warships dock at Saudi port

Saturday, February 4th, 2012

The Daily Star

February 04, 2012 04:08 PM (Last updated: February 04, 2012 04:21 PM)

TEHRAN: Iranian naval ships docked on Saturday in the Saudi port city of Jeddah on a mission to project the Islamic republic’s “power on the open seas,” the Fars news agency reported.

The supply ship Kharg and Shaid Qandi, a destroyer, docked in the Red Sea port in line with orders from Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, it quoted navy commander Admiral Habibollah Sayari as saying.

“This mission aims to show the power of the Islamic republic of Iran on the open seas and to confront Iranophobia,” he said, adding that the mission started several days ago and would last 70 to 80 days.

The commander did not give other destinations.

Iran’s navy has been boosting its presence in international waters since last year, deploying vessels in the Indian Ocean and Gulf of Aden on missions to protect Iranian ships from Somali pirates.

Tehran also sent two ships into the Mediterranean for the first time in February 2011 through the Suez Canal.

Ties between Iran and Saudi Arabia, which have long been strained, deteriorated in late 2011 following US allegations that a foiled plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to Washington had been hatched in Tehran.

Tehran has also called on Riyadh to reconsider its vow to make up for any shortfall in Iran’s oil exports due to sanctions over its nuclear program, saying Riyadh’s pledge to intervene on the market was unfriendly.

 

U.N. Nuclear Inspectors’ Visit to Iran Is a Failure, West Says

Saturday, February 4th, 2012

The New York Times

via Agence France-Presse — Getty Images . President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, third from right, attended prayers led by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in an image provided by the ayatollah’s office.

Published: February 3, 2012

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — American and European officials said Friday that a mission by international nuclear inspectors to Tehran this week had failed to address their key concerns, indicating that Iran’s leaders believe they can resist pressure to open up the nation’s nuclear program.

The assessment came as Iran’s supreme leader lashed out at the United States, vowing to retaliate against oil sanctions and threats of military action and warning that any attack “would be 10 times worse for the interests of the United States” than it would be for Iran.

While the inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency, who returned to Vienna after a three-day mission in Tehran, said nothing substantive about their trip and were planning to return to Iran later this month, diplomats briefed on the trip said that Iranian officials had not answered the questions raised in an incriminating report issued by the agency in November.

That report cited documents and evidence of experiments with detonators that strongly suggested Iran might have worked on technologies to turn its nuclear fuel into working weapons and warheads. Tehran has insisted its uranium enrichment activities are peaceful and has dismissed the evidence suggesting otherwise as fabricated or taken out of context, and has refused to engage in substantive discussions or inspections.

Members of the I.A.E.A. delegation were told that they could not have access to Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, an academic who is widely believed to be in charge of important elements of the suspected weaponization program, and that they could not visit a military site where the agency’s report suggested key experiments on weapons technology might have been carried out.

“The agency expressed interest in all the areas of concern,” said a diplomat based in Vienna, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “The team asked for access in the future to different types of sites and personnel, and that was denied.”

One senior American official described the session between the agency and Iranian nuclear officials as “foot-dragging at best and a disaster at worst.” But a diplomat at the agency’s headquarters in Vienna said “disaster is too strong a word.” He added: “Iran has refused to address the issue for three years now. To be fair, you have to give them credit for at least discussing it. The dialogue is continuing, and that’s a good sign.”

In Tehran, the speech by the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, made during Friday Prayer and broadcast live to the nation, came amid deepening American concern about a possible military strike on Iran’s nuclear enrichment sites by Israel, whose leaders delivered blunt new warnings on Thursday about what they called the need to stop Iran’s nuclear program. Israel considers a nuclear-armed Iran a threat to its existence.

Israeli leaders have issued mixed signals regarding their intentions, suggesting that they are willing, for a short time at least, to wait and see if increasingly strict sanctions, including a European oil embargo, will force Iran to give in to inspectors’ demands, and to cease the production of at least some of the uranium that outside experts fear could be turned into bomb fuel.

The ayatollah also issued an unusually blunt warning that Iran would support militant groups opposing Israel, an action that some analysts said could be held up by Israel as a casus belli.

Reinforcing the concern, ABC News reported on Friday that Israeli consular officials were warning of possible attacks on Israeli government sites abroad and synagogues and Jewish schools. ABC quoted an internal Israeli document as saying, “We predict that the threat on our sites around the world will increase.”

Without being specific, Ayatollah Khamenei said that Iran “had its own tools” to respond to threats of war and would use them “if necessary,” the Mehr news agency reported.

Ayatollah Khamenei referred to the sanctions as “painful and crippling,” according to Iranian news agencies, acknowledging the effect of recent measures aimed at cutting off Iran’s Central Bank from the international financial system. But he also said the sanctions would ultimately benefit his country. “They will make us more self-reliant,” he said, according to a translation by Iran’s semiofficial Fars news agency.

In recent weeks, senior American and European officials have visited Israel to counsel patience, warning that a military attack could backfire and strengthen what they called Iran’s determination to acquire nuclear weapons.

Two senior Israeli officials, including the head of the Mossad, the intelligence agency believed to be responsible for the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists, visited Washington over the past week, for what officials described as sometimes contentious meetings. Israeli officials say they are worried that Iran may soon be immune to the threat of airstrikes as its enrichment facilities are moved into deep mountain bunkers.

Israel’s defense minister, Ehud Barak, said at a conference in Israel on Thursday that if sanctions failed to stop Iran’s nuclear program, Israel would need to “consider taking action,” according to the newspaper Haaretz.

Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta, at the Ramstein Air Base in Germany on Friday, echoed the sentiment.

“My view is that right now the most important thing is to keep the international community unified in keeping that pressure on, to try to convince Iran that they shouldn’t develop a nuclear weapon, that they should join the international family of nations and that they should operate by the rules that we all operate by,” he said. “But I have to tell you, if they don’t, we have all options on the table, and we’ll be prepared to respond if we have to.”

In Washington, there was evidence on Friday that a new Senate bill for tougher sanctions, which could effectively sever Iranian banks from a global financial telecommunications network, was having an effect, even before a full Senate vote.

The network, known as the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, or Swift, would face unspecified penalties under the legislation if it failed to sever sanctioned Iranian banks. Swift, based in Belgium, said in a statement on Friday that it “fully understands and appreciates the gravity of the situation,” and was working with banking regulators “to find the right multilateral legal framework which will enable Swift to address the issues.”

Expulsion from Swift could be catastrophic for Iran’s economy by blocking a major conduit for foreign revenue.

Robert F. Worth reported from Dubai, and David E. Sanger from Washington. Reporting was contributed by William J. Broad, J. David Goodman and Rick Gladstone from New York, and Elisabeth Bumiller from Ramstein Air Base, Germany.

 

 

 

 

Iran says oil ban will not halt its nuclear program, warns of turmoil

Saturday, February 4th, 2012

Saturday, 04 February 2012

Iranian Oil Minister Rostam Qasemi Iran has said an oil ban will not its halt nuclear program and warned of market turmoil if the ban was put into effect. (Reuters)

Iranian Oil Minister Rostam Qasemi Iran has said an oil ban will not its halt nuclear program and warned of market turmoil if the ban was put into effect. (Reuters)
By PARISA HAFEZI AND RAMIN MOSTAFAVI
REUTERS TEHRAN

Iran’s oil minister said the Islamic state would not retreat from its nuclear program even if its crude oil exports grind to a halt, the official IRNA news agency reported on Saturday.

But he also called on the European Union, which accounted for a quarter of Iranian crude oil sales in the third quarter of 2011, to review its decision last week to bank Iranian oil imports from July 1.

“We will not abandon our just nuclear course, even if we cannot sell one drop of oil,” Rostam Qasemi told reporters, according to IRNA.

Tension with the West rose last month when Washington and the European Union imposed the toughest sanctions yet on Iran in a bid to force it to provide more information on its nuclear program. The measures are aimed at shutting off the second-biggest OPEC oil exporters’ sales of crude.

Qasemi said Iran would cut oil exports to some nations in Europe – he did not specify which – in retaliation for the 27-state EU’s decision to stop importing Iranian crude.

“Our oil exports will certainly be cut to some European countries … We will decide about other European countries later,” Qasemi told a news conference, IRNA reported.

He urged Europe to reconsider its ban, and said the oil market is in balance now but would be thrown into turmoil without Iranian crude supplies.

“Unfortunately the EU has succumbed to America’s pressure. I hope they would review their decision on sanctioning Iran’s oil exports,” Qasemi said.

“The international crude market will experience turmoil in the absence of Iranian oil with unforeseen consequences on oil prices,” he said.

However, analysts say the global oil market would not be greatly affected if Iran were to turn off the oil tap to Europe.

The EU’s ban on Iranian oil came after U.S. President Barack Obama signed new sanctions into law on New Year’s Eve that would block any institution dealing with Iran’s central bank from the U.S. financial system.

If fully implemented, these measures will make it impossible for countries to buy Iranian oil.

Alternative crude buyers

Brent crude prices rose to near three-month peaks on Friday, partly thanks to oil investors covering short positions ahead of the weekend due to the standoff between the West and Tehran over its nuclear program.

The United States wants buyers in Asia, Iran’s biggest oil market, to cut imports to put further pressure on Tehran, which is scrambling to find new buyers and persuade existing customers to keep doing business with it.

But Iran remains a key supplier for many countries, and some of its major customers are seeking waivers from Washington from the sanctions while they look for alternative sources of oil.

Saudi Arabia, Iran’s regional rival, has promised to make up any shortfall in supply.

Iranian officials have said sanctions have had no impact on it, while the country’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei threatened on Friday to retaliate against the West for sanctions.

Qasemi also played down the importance of Europe as a market for its exports.

“We have no problem to find other crude buyers to replace the European countries,” he was quoted as saying.

The United States and its allies say Iran is trying to develop weapons under cover of a civilian nuclear program. But energy-rich Iran denies this, saying it needs nuclear technology to generate electricity.

Washington and Israel have not ruled out military action if diplomacy fails to resolve the standoff. Iran has warned of firm retaliation if attacked, including targeting Israel and U.S. bases in the Gulf and closing off the vital oil shipping route through the Strait of Hormuz.

But Qasemi played down the possibility of Iran blocking the crucial waterway.

“Iran is not after tension, and closure of the Strait is a politically motivated issue,” he said.

Isolated Iran is also facing problems over the price it charges neighbor Turkey for its natural gas exports. Turkey said on Jan. 31 that it was taking Tehran to international arbitration over the matter.

Qasemi rejected Ankara’s complaint that the price was too high. “Iran surely cannot decrease its natural gas price (for Turkey) without legal authorization,” he said.

Iran exports 10 billion cubic meters of gas each year to Turkey, making it Ankara’s second-biggest supplier after Russia.

Americans talk about an Israeli strike on Iran, but prepare own offensive

Saturday, February 4th, 2012

DEBKAfile Exclusive Report February 4, 2012

US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta has been outspoken about a possible Israeli offensive against Iran taking place as of April and one American TV channel theorized simplistically Friday, Feb. 3, about Israel’s tactics. At the same time, no US source is leveling on the far more extensive American, Saudi, British, French and Gulf states’ preparations going forward for an offensive against the Islamic Republic.

Tehran too is gearing up for conflict: The Iranian Guards Ground Forces chief Brig. Gen. Mohammad Pakpour Saturday, Feb. 4 announced the start of a three-week exercise in southern Iran and the Strait of Hormuz under conditions of war.DEBKAfile: The “exercise” is in fact an Iranian military buildup ahead of a possible American or Israel attack.

DEBKAfile’s military sources report a steady flow of many thousands of US troops for some weeks to two strategic islands within reach of Iran, Oman’s Masirah just south of the Strait of Hormuz and Socotra, between Yemen and the Horn of Africa. (DEBKA-Net-Weekly 526 of Jan. 27 was the first world publication to reveal the massive concentration of American might on the two islands.)

This concentration was held by the White House as sufficiently urgent to relent on its refusal to admit the ousted Yemeni leader Ali Abdullah Salah to America for medical treatment. He won permission in exchange for his consent to the Socotra military buildup.

There are now two potential triggers for a Middle East confrontation with Iran. They are closely interrelated: The urgent need for action this year to preempt Iran’s nuclear bomb program before it is too late and the Syrian army’s appalling and escalating butchery of civilians.

Even as world powers haggled over a bogged-down UN Security Council motion for ending the loss of life, a continuous Syrian bombardment beginning early Saturday, Feb. 4, is estimated to have left a record 350 dead and up to 1,300 wounded in the Homs district of Khaldiyeh. The casualty figures continued to climb Saturday as Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov threatened a “scandal” if the Western-Arab text were put to the vote.

Bashar Assad was clearly determined to wipe out every family and home in the defiant Homs suburb in case the world body agreed on a ceasefire resolution.

Our military sources report that the Saudis this week wound up their own intensive preparations for war. Large forces are now deployed around Saudi oil fields, pipelines and export facilities in the eastern provinces opposite the Persian Gulf, backed by anti-missile Patriot PAC-3 batteries. American, British and French fighter-bombers have been landing at Saudi air bases to safeguard the capital, Riyadh.

Israel has accelerated, expanded and focused its military drill regimen for the coming conflict. Tuesday, Jan. 31, a division-scale exercise practiced the drafting of reservists under projected heavy missile bombardment of military bases, induction centers, national highways and towns from at least three directions: Syria, Lebanon and the Gaza Strip, as well as Iran.

Thursday, Feb. 2, Military Intelligence Chief Maj. Gen. Avivi Kochavi disclosed that 200,000 missiles and rockets, including thousands of long-range projectiles, were currently pointed at Israel, the only country in the world facing a threat on this scale.

Two weeks earlier, the IDF Paratrooper Brigade staged its biggest exercise in over 15 years: More than 1,000 paratroopers jumped from the sky over southern Israel together with their departmental and squadron commanders. Israel sought to demonstrate that it commands enough fighting manpower to operate deep inside enemy territory, as well as the planes for delivering the combatants.

In his sermon to followers Friday, Feb.3, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei made it clear that Iran’s allies would be involved in any confrontation and Israel was a prime target:  Iran, he said, is ready to help anyone who confronts “cancerous” Israel. He also warned Washington, “The war itself will be ten times as detrimental to the US.”

Khamenei credited Iran’s help for achieving Hizballah’s “victorious” attack on Israel in 2006 and for Hamas’ “success” in beating back Israel’s anti-missile operation in Gaza that year.

The Supreme Leader was clearly egging on Iran’s allies, Syria, Hizballah and the Palestinian Hamas and Jihad Islami, to go for Israel again.

DEBKAfile’s Middle East analysts challenge the hypothesis heard in Israel and other places that the massive war preparations going forward at this time are backing for sanctions, contrived to propel Iran to the negotiating table and accept a deal for halting its nuclear weapon program.
Our sources stress that these military preparations are for real and are taken very seriously by all the governments concerned because Tehran is far from being intimidated by threats.

Khamenei confirmed authoritatively Friday what other Iranian officials have consistently maintained, that Tehran will not give up its nuclear plans no matter how much pressure is brought to bear. Iran had its chance to cool some of the pressure by opening up to a team of International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors who visited Tehran last week – but chose not to do so.

In their three-day stay, the inspectors were denied access to any Iranian nuclear facility, notably the Parchin plant 30 kilometers southwest of Tehran, which is developing nuclear bombs and warheads – or even interview the scientists employed there.

While Israel’s military preparations for hostilities with Iran are now widely reported, two gaps remain to be filled, says DEBKAfile:
1.  As the ayatollahs witness the vast US, Saudi, Israel, British, French and Arab Gulf war preparations around their borders, will they opt to watch and wait for the sword to fall, or will they try and get in first with a hammer blow against Israel, a course Khamenei hinted at broadly in his latest speech.

2. Are Washington and Jerusalem in alignment – or at least in tacit accord – on who goes first against Iran’s nuclear installations? The reports and statements coming from US sources make it sound as though only an Israeli attack is in the offing. Informed circles in Tehran, Damascus, Riyadh and Jerusalem are not so sure.

 

Bad Behavior has blocked 4205 access attempts in the last 7 days.