EU

...now browsing by tag

 
 

EU, Iran to Consult on Tehran’s Nuke Program

Thursday, May 2nd, 2013

ABC News

VIENNA May 2, 2013 (AP)

The European Union says its senior diplomat will meet Iran’s top nuclear negotiator on May 15 as a follow-up to the last round of six-power negotiations on Tehran’s nuclear program.

That meeting in Almaty, Kazakhstan, ended on April 6 with the two sides still far apart. The six want Iran to stop enriching uranium to a level just a technical step short of the grade used to arm nuclear warheads. Iran says it has a right to enrich for energy, medical and research purposes and insists it does not want atomic arms.

An EU email from Brussels announcing the May 15 meeting in Istanbul offered no details. But the EU’s Catherine Ashton and Iran’s Saeed Jalili will likely discuss whether there is enough common ground to schedule new negotiations.

Some G8 ministers to meet Syrian opposition in London: Hague

Tuesday, April 9th, 2013

British Foreign Secretary William Hague says several G8 foreign ministers will meet senior Syrian opposition members this week in London. (Reuters)

Tuesday, 9 April 2013

AFP, London -

Several G8 foreign ministers will meet senior Syrian opposition members this week in London on the sidelines of a ministerial meeting, British Foreign Secretary William Hague said on Tuesday.

His comments came after U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry confirmed that he would be among those meeting the rebel representatives in the British capital.

Hague said he had already met Syrian rebel prime minister Ghassan Hitto and two senior members of the Syrian National Coalition on Tuesday and discussed with them the issue of arming the opposition.

“In the two days before the G8 meeting, today and tomorrow, I have invited Syrian opposition leaders, leaders of the National Coalition to London. I met them this morning,” Hague told a briefing of foreign journalists in London.

“They will be able to meet with some of the G8 foreign ministers tomorrow before the G8 fully gathers. Again I will be joining and convening some of those meetings to discuss the urgent humanitarian needs and the urgent need for a political and diplomatic breakthrough on Syria.”

The other rebel leaders he had met were Syrian National Coalition vice presidents George sabra and Soheir Atassi, Hague said.

He did not specify which ministers would meet with the SNC leaders, with Russia being highly unlikely to do so given its support for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

Hague said Britain and France would continue to push for the lifting of an EU arms embargo to Syria so they can arm the rebels.

“We certainly believe it is necessary if the situation continues to deteriorate to increase the practical help we give to the Syrian opposition, to the National Coalition — I have been discussing that directly with them this morning,” he said.

Kerry on Tuesday said he would meet representatives of the Syrian opposition in London, speaking shortly before taking off from Israel for the British capital.

“I will be meeting with the Syrian opposition in London,” he told reporters travelling with his delegation before departing from Ben Gurion airport near Tel Aviv after three days of talks with Israeli and Palestinian leaders.

Hague said the meeting of foreign ministers from the Group of Eight industrialized nations would also discuss North Korea, Iran, Myanmar, Somalia, cyber-security and the issue of preventing sexual violence in warzones.

The G8 foreign ministers — from Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia and the United States — hold a dinner on Wednesday and formal talks on Thursday.

Iran rial hits all-time dollar low: trackers

Saturday, February 2nd, 2013

Saturday, 02 February 2013

A money changer holds Iranian rial banknotes as he waits for customers in Tehran's business district January 7, 2012. (Reuters)

A money changer holds Iranian rial banknotes as he waits for customers in Tehran’s business district January 7, 2012. (Reuters)

By AFP 
TEHRAN

Iran’s currency plummeted to an all-time low on Saturday, registering a more than 21-percent drop in a span of two weeks against the U.S. dollar, currency tracking websites and money changers said.

The rial was traded at between 39,000 and 40,000 per dollar on the open market on Saturday, down from about 33,000 two weeks ago, according to money changers contacted by AFP.

It had briefly dropped in late January to 37,000 per dollar amid rumors that central bank head Mahmoud Bahmani could be sacked because of his failure to shore up the rial.

The devaluation comes with Iran facing a growing shortage of foreign cash because of international sanctions against its central bank and vital oil sector over its disputed nuclear program.

Uncertainty over stalled negotiations with the U.N.’s atomic watchdog agency and world powers over the nuclear standoff has added to controversy over the rial, according to local media.

The currency was traded at 12,000 in late 2011, prior to the introduction of tough Western sanctions on Iran’s oil and banking sectors.

The official dollar rate in Iran has been fixed for several months at 12,260 rials, but is reserved for official government business. Parallel to the open market, another rate of 24,550 rials is reserved for a few companies importing food or other goods judged essential.

Iran is suffering from heightened geopolitical tensions over its nuclear ambitions and the effects of draconian Western measures curbing access to its reduced oil exports.

The West fears Iran’s atomic program is aimed at developing nuclear weapons, but Tehran insists that its activities are peaceful.

In addition to Western sanctions, some analysts and lawmakers blame the government for what they call mismanagement and failure to feed the market with sufficient foreign currency, stoking the currency plunge and high inflation.

The government, meanwhile, has promised to take measures to support the rial but so far there has been no sign of the pressure on Iran’s currency easing.

Sanctions ‘paralysing’ entire economy, says Iranian minister

Thursday, January 10th, 2013

01/10/2013

GVF — The international sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme are having a “ paralyzing” impact on the country’s economy, says a cabinet minister.

According to a report by the Ilna news agency, Iran’s Minister of Industry, Mine and Trade Mehdi Ghazanfari conceded that the international sanctions were indeed “paralysing” the economy. He said that the sanctions imposed after December 2006 were “very smart and affect the entire economy,” because they included Iran’s oil exports as well as its central bank, and thus placed a significant strain on financial resources.

“The sanctions are aimed at putting the people under pressure, not at the nuclear programme or the human rights situation,” Ghazanfari continued. The sanctions on Iran’s shipping companies, he added, had worsened the economic situation even further.

The minister said that even though the sanctions did not include the import of food medicine, the sanctions on Iran’s banking had made the purchase of medical equipment and supplies even more difficult.

The plunge in the value of the nation’s currency, a by-product of the sanctions, has resulted in a steep rise in the price of medicine. According to the Associated Press, an imported wheelchair now costs ten times more than last fall, while a blood-sugar test kit has more than doubled to 540,000 Rials, or about $18.

Critics of the crushing sanctions say they ultimately harm ordinary Iranians, in particular the country’s most vulnerable.

Germany and U.S. deploy patriot missiles to Turkey, Russia wavers

Friday, December 14th, 2012

Friday, 14 December 2012
Soldiers of the German Air Defence Missile Squadron 2 walking past Patriot missile launchers in the background in Bad Suelze, northern Germany. (AFP)

Soldiers of the German Air Defence Missile Squadron 2 walking past Patriot missile launchers in the background in Bad Suelze, northern Germany. (AFP)

Germany and the United States both agreed on Friday to deploy missiles and army forces to the Turkish-Syrian borders to help guard Turkey against possible Syrian attack as part of a NATO mission.

The U.S. will deploy two Patriot missile batteries to along with 400 troops as while Germany will be positioning its Patriot missile batteries 120 kilometers from the Syrian border in southern Turkey with a mandate that will run until Jan. 31, 2014

Germany’s government coalition parties, the main opposition Social Democrats and Greens had said they backed the move. Only the far-left Die Linke party was opposed.

The German foreign and defense ministries last week said the move was an “exclusively defensive measure, which as a means of military deterrent prevents the conflict inside Syria spreading to Turkey”.

Meanwhile, Moscow backtracked on comments made by a top diplomat admitting that Syrian opposition fighters might defeat its long-time ally Damascus despite Washington’s deployment of 400 troops to Turkey.

A Russian foreign ministry spokesman insisted that Moscow’s controversial support for Assad’s regime was unchanged and that Thursday’s remarks by Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov did not reflect official policy.

A foreign ministry spokesman insisted that Moscow’s controversial support for Assad’s regime was unchanged and that Thursday’s remarks by Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov did not reflect official policy.

But Washington swiftly welcomed Bogdanov’s remarks and announced its troop deployment as U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta flew to an air base in southeastern Turkey not far from the frontier where the rebels have rear bases.

The move coincides with rising fears the Syrian regime may resort to using chemical weapons against rebel forces and after Assad’s army unleashed Scud missiles in recent days.

The move was part of a wider NATO effort to bolster Turkey’s air defenses amid growing tension on the Turkish-Syrian border, with Ankara siding with opposition forces battling President Bashar al-Assad’s regime.

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta issued the order before landing at the Incirlik airbase in Turkey after a visit to Afghanistan, his spokesman said.

“The secretary, as we are en route to Turkey, has signed an order that will deploy some 400 U.S. personnel to Turkey to support two Patriot missile batteries,” George Little told reporters aboard Panetta’s plane.

“We expect them to be deployed in the coming weeks.”

Turkey is a “very strong ally” and the US government is prepared in the context of NATO to support the defense of Turkey,” Little said.

U.S. and European leaders have warned the Assad regime not to use its arsenal of chemical arms, calling it a “red line” that would trigger international military action.

Turkey has vowed to defend its territory after cross-border artillery fire wounded civilians and following the downing of one of its fighter jets.

EU to consider all options to help Syrian opposition fighters

Friday, December 14th, 2012

Friday, 14 December 2012

By REUTERS 
BRUSSELS
German Chancellor Angela Merkel speaks during a press conference at the EU Headquarters on December 14, 2012 in Brussels, on the last day of a two-day European Union leaders summit. (AFP)

German Chancellor Angela Merkel speaks during a press conference at the EU Headquarters on December 14, 2012 in Brussels, on the last day of a two-day European Union leaders summit. (AFP)

All options are on the table to support the Syrian opposition fighting President Bashar al-Assad, European Union leaders said on Friday, raising the possibility that non-lethal military equipment or even arms could eventually be supplied.

In their strongest statement of support for the Syrian opposition since the uprising began more than 20 months ago, EU leaders instructed their foreign ministers to assess all possibilities to increase the pressure on Assad.

Britain’s David Cameron pushed for an early review of the arms embargo against Syria to potentially open the way to supply equipment to the opposition fighters in the coming months, but Germany and others were more reluctant and blocked any quick move.

But there was widespread agreement that whatever action can be taken under current legislation should be pursued, and the arms embargo would still be reviewed at a later stage.

“I want a very clear message to go to President Assad that nothing is off the table,” Cameron told reporters at the end of a two-day EU summit. “I want us to work with the opposition … so that we can see the speediest possible transition in Syria.

“There is no single simple answer, but inaction and indifference are not options.”

Officials said that Britain and France were keen for further discussion on lifting the arms embargo, to open the way for non-lethal assistance, at least initially.
That could be discussed as soon as Jan. 28, when EU foreign ministers will hold their next meeting in Brussels.

But Germany Chancellor Angela Merkel was far more cautious than Cameron, saying it was too soon to change the arms embargo.

“We are all convinced that there must be a political change in Syria, that the future of Syria is without Assad,” she told reporters. “If it comes to a change of power and departure of Assad, then there must be a respect of human rights and protection of minorities.”
But when it comes to arms or assistance with non-lethal equipment, she said it had not explicitly been discussed at the summit, saying it would be left up to foreign ministers.

“The foreign ministers are to discuss how to help the opposition … Nothing has been decided as far as a loosening of the arms embargo goes,” she said.

The EU’s support for the Syrian opposition comes amid reports of gains for opposition fighters fighting Assad’s forces. Even Russia – an ally and arms supplier to Assad – has conceded there is the possibility of a rebel victory.

On Monday, EU foreign ministers had moved closer towards full recognition of the opposition Syrian National Coalition (SNC), after they met leader Mouaz Alkhatib in Brussels.

Pushed by Britain, the bloc decided in late November to review sanctions on Syria every three months instead of every year as previously, in order to make it easier for EU countries to equip the opposition fighters.

The current embargo on the supply of arms to the country was imposed to prevent the flow of weapons to Assad’s forces. The new, shorter review period will allow the EU to look at amendments that might allow the supply of non-lethal equipment to the opposition fighters.

U.N. very concerned about human rights in Egypt after Mursi decree

Friday, November 23rd, 2012

Friday, 23 November 2012

By AL ARABIYA WITH AGENCIES

U.N. Human Rights Commissioner Navi Pillay said Egyptian President Mohammed Mursi’s recent decree raises very serious human rights concerns. (Reuters)

U.N. Human Rights Commissioner Navi Pillay said Egyptian President Mohammed Mursi’s recent decree raises very serious human rights concerns. (Reuters)

A wide-ranging decree issued by Egyptian President Mohammed Mursi raises very serious human rights concerns, U.N. Human Rights Commissioner Navi Pillay’s spokesman said on Friday.

“We are very concerned about the possible huge ramifications of this declaration on human rights and the rule of law in Egypt,” Rupert Colville told a news briefing at the United Nations in Geneva. “We also fear this could lead to a very volatile situation over the next few days, starting today in fact.”

Meanwhile, supporters and opponents of Mursi called rival demonstrations Friday after the Islamist leader assumed sweeping powers in what critics dubbed a “coup.”

An array of liberal and secular groups, including activists at the forefront of the protest movement that forced veteran strongman Hosni Mubarak from power early last year, planned to march on Tahrir Square, Cairo’s iconic protest hub, to demonstrate against the “new pharaoh.”

Mursi’s Decrees

A rundown of the main presidential decrees made in the announcement.

1. President announces that all decisions, laws and declarations passed by the president since taking office cannot be appealed or revoked by any authority, including the judicary.

2. President announces that Egypt’s constitution-drafting body and the Shura Council (uppper house of parliament) cannot be dissolved by any authority, including the judicary. In addition, the timeframe for drafting the constitution has been extended by two months, to eight months in total. The Constituent Assembly was due to hand in the final draft of Egypt’s national charter by the 5 December.

3. President announces the re-trial all those charged with killing or injuring protesters involved in revolutionary demonstrations since January 25 Revolution. In addition, all Mubarak-era officials responsible for terrorizing protesters will be retried.

4. President announces appointment of Talaat Ibrahim as prosecutor-general in place of Abdel-Meguid Mahmoud.

(Courtesy: Ahram Online)

World powers to confer on Iran next week

Thursday, November 15th, 2012

Theaustralian.com

AAP
November 16, 2012 5:28AM

TOP negotiators from six world powers will meet in Brussels next week to discuss diplomatic efforts to defuse the Iran nuclear crisis.

EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton’s office said on Thursday the meeting would be the first on the sensitive issue since the US election that saw President Barack Obama returned to office and comes ahead of an expected new round of talks with Iran by early 2013 at the latest.

Political directors from the so-called P5+1 group – the five permanent UN Security Council members, the United States, China, Russia, Britain and France, plus Germany – last met to discuss Iran’s nuclear program in New York in September.

But the last high-level talks attended by Iran, which all but failed, were held in Moscow in June, with Tehran rejecting P5+1 calls for it to scale back its nuclear activities which the West suspect are a cover for efforts to build an atomic bomb.

Ashton’s office said the November 21 gathering, held on the eve of an EU summit, was part of “consultations to find a diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear issue”.

The announcement came a day after Obama promised to launch a new diplomatic push to solve the longstanding crisis, saying there was still a “window of time”.

His comments came after reports of possible direct talks between Washington and Tehran that surfaced just before the US election on November 6.

“With respect to Iran, I very much want to see a diplomatic resolution to the problem,” Obama told a White House press conference.

“I will try to make a push in the coming months to see if we can open up a dialogue between Iran and not just us, but the international community, to see if we can get this thing resolved.”

Ashton has been chairing talks with Tehran as part of the international community’s “twin-track” approach to ensure Iran cannot obtain a nuclear weapon – tightening the economic noose through increasingly severe sanctions in hopes of bringing Tehran to the negotiating table.

Iran insists it is developing nuclear energy for peaceful, civilian purposes but Israel and Western nations fear the program is a cover for a drive to produce nuclear weapons.

EP-Iran Delegation’s Trip to Iran, a Despicable Visit

Friday, October 26th, 2012

10/26/2012

By: Mansur Rastani, PhD

Once again the oppressed Iranian people were shocked to hear that European Parliament will soon be embarking on an official visit of their lawmakers to Iran. The visit is scheduled from October 27 to November 02, 2012. The question on every Iranian mind is: “How can they even think of going to Tehran at this stage of time?” It seems that there is a sever discord between European Parliament and European Union proceedings when it comes to Iran policy. On October 15, 2012, EU member States have imposed new sanctions on Iran for its reckless behavior that endangers global security, a dramatic reminder that relations with Iran cannot be business as usual. These punitive steps are meant to persuade Iran to engage constructively by addressing the concerns of the International community.  However the trip of EP delegation while basically undermines such EU’s efforts and consequently results in the detraction from their achievement of broader objectives, it would also send incongruous messages to Tehran, making the regime to callously exploit the visit for propaganda purposes.

Per July 2012 EP delegation meeting minutes , the EP delegates plan to discuss with Iranian leaders several issues, including human rights, nuclear negotiations, and drug trafficking. For more than 3 decades the state of human rights in the Islamic regime of Iran has been criticized both by Iranians and international human right activists, writers, and NGOs. The United Nations General Assembly and the Human Rights Commissionhave condemned prior and ongoing abuses in Iran in published critiques and several resolutions. Such abuses include unfair trials, torture of prisoners, extrajudicial executions, persecution of religious and ethnic minorities,  restrictions on freedom of religion and gender quality, execution of offenders under 18 years of age, repression of journalists,  cruel treatment of human rights defenders, and restrictions on freedom of speech and the press.  Just a few days ago Ahmed Shaheed, UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in Iran said that the Iranian government is responsible for conspicuously rights violations. He expressed his concern about the exacerbating status of human rights situation in Iran. Iran has never allowed independent bodies to look into its human rights record. Shaheed’s report is based on some 240 interviews with individuals who have reported violations of their rights. The Iranian regime has made it clear on numerous occasions that they do not care for dialogue with the West. No self-respecting Western officials should offer any legitimacy to the Iranian regime which defiantly ignores the will of the international community.

Years, if not decades, of diplomacy on deterring Iran’s nuclear program has led nowhere. Iran continues to build up enrichment capacity; it has already refined uranium to a fissile concentration of 20%, which let the country to take a significant technical step closer to the 90 percent concentration needed for bombs, explaining the growing concern about the Islamic regime’s stockpile of the material. The Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS), this month said Iran would currently need at least two to four months to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for one nuclear bomb, and additional time to make the device itself. US and allies has long been monitoring the situation in Iran, holding numerous meetings for diplomatic negotiations with the regime, trying carrot-and-stick policies in their conciliations, and issuing countless punitive resolutions, a long-shot approach aimed at yielding a collaborated solution that has eluded them for more than a decade.  A nuclear-armed Iran will seek regional dominance and be a threat to peace and stability in the Middle East and to the world. Only adopting a policy, which leads to a collapse of the power structure of this terrorist regime, would put an end to its escalating nuclear threat.

Reports state that Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) is running Iran drug trade. Iran is a transit route for narcotics smuggled from neighboring Afghanistan, which produces more than 90 percent of the world’s opium, the raw ingredient of heroin. Based on remarks by former regime officials, members of Iran’s RGC have taken control of drug trafficking throughout the Islamic regime, using billions of dollars to institute links with a global crime network. Through the process of drug trafficking, regime provides for its radical proxies and funds terrorist activities. Iran’s drug policy is just a matter of hypocrisy, outside the IRGC monopoly, those caught dealing drugs have been dealt with ruthlessly by the regime, it is reported that in several cities there have been mass, secret executions to wipe out chronic drug problems. Those killed mostly have come from poor rural backgrounds. Furthermore, trumped-up drugs charges have also been used to execute political prisoners and opposition supporters. Labeling political prisoners, or executed individuals as drug traffickers is tactic of Islamic regime and the world is well aware of it. Last year, they hanged a Dutch woman on trumped up charges of involvement in drug smuggling, when in fact she had been originally arrested for participating in a political protest. The Dutch government closed its embassy and withdrew its ambassador in protest. Iran’s publicly-declared commitment to fighting the war against drugs is both a smokescreen and a charade. Getting help from such hypocrite regime in combating trafficking and heroin production in the region would not only perceive as carrying water in a sieve but would help the IRGC to promote its drug trafficking network.

Among the most disturbing meetings on the draft schedule for the Europeans is a visiting session with some of the regime’s leaders including Sadegh Larigani, Kazem Jalali, and Ali Akbar Hasemi Rafsanjani. Sadegh Larijani is the Iranian Chief Justice, who was sanctioned by the EU in March for his role in human rights violations. Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, is a former president of Iran. An Argentinian judge issued an arrest warrant for him, in 2006, for his role in the 1994 bombing of the AMIA Jewish community center in Buenos Aires that killed 85 people.  He is the one who said: “The use of even one nuclear bomb inside Israel will destroy everything; however it would only harm the Islamic world.” Kazem Jalali, Chairman of the Friendship Group between the Majlis and the European Parliament, is said to “boast “on his website of his membership of the Bassidj paramilitary force and IRGC, which is on the EU and US terrorist list. In a recent speech he praised the victory of Hezbollah over the “Zionist regime” in the 33-day war in Lebanon, claiming it to be one of Iran’s “greatest achievements”. Per Article 6 and 11, of the EU Treaty, EP delegation activities shall contribute to promoting in third countries the values on which the European Union is founded, namely the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law. How would EP delegation justify contributing such promotions while scheduling to meet the Iranian parliamentary members many of whom are among commanders of the disreputable IRGC that have been involved in horrifying human rights abuses, drug trafficking, and act of terrorism across the globe?

The July 2012 EP delegation meeting minutes assert that the visit will provide the opportunity for dialogue between the two delegations and should be regarded as a bridge building exercise.  Three decades of pressure by world community on Iran hasn’t made the regime change its conduct. The international community, including U.S., EU, UN Security Council have reached a consensus on the following concerns regarding the behavior of the Iran’s clerical government, that the regime:

1. Is pursuing a military nuclear program,

2. Supports terrorists across the globe,

3. Intervenes in the internal affairs of its neighbors, and other countries in the region

4. Undermines any activities for the peace movement in the region,

5. Infringes upon the freedom and human rights of its own people,

6. Disregard the right of the Iranian people to chart their own future through democratic means.

Instability is growing at a rapid pace inside Iran and the political situation is changing. This trend is aggravated by a worsening economic condition which has brought Iran to the verge of major change. The people of Iran, in their struggle for freedom, have stood against the widespread repression of the regime. There is the need for EU policy towards Iran to express solidarity with all those resisting repression and fighting for basic freedoms and democracy. Rather than setting out a delegation team to Iran, which would give the regime a new blood to revitalize; it would serve Europe a great extent to put their hope on Iranian people. The future of Iran will be decided by the people, especially the younger generation that wants to replace the theocratic regime with a secular democratic one at any price. The European Parliament should know that in the very near future it is going to deal with the people and not a minority of self-serving clerics and for that reason EP should exercise building bridge with the oppressed people of Iran and not the elements of the regime.

Dr. Mansur Rastani is freelance writer and a faculty member at NCSU, NCA&TSU and CSUM. He grew up in Iran. In 1978 after finishing undergraduate studies in Mechanical Engineering and working at NIOC for few years moved to U.S. and completed his graduate studies toward a PhD degree in the same field.  He has authored numerous scientific articles and worked as a researcher at NASA, Jet Propulsion Lab and other governmental agencies.  Since 2008 Mansur has voluntarily been an independent advocate in writing open letters to U.S. administration and its cabinet members, members of the congress, and the EU parliamentary members inquiring their support for democratic movement in Iran. He has also been assisting the Iranian movement inside the country by getting their messages to the world community across the globe through his websites. He can be reached through his website http://mansurrastani.wordpress.com .

 

 

October Surprise: Direct Talks with Iran?

Monday, October 22nd, 2012

Frontpagemag.com

October 22, 2012 By Joseph Klein

On the eve of the third and final presidential debate, which deals with foreign policy, the New York Times ran a lead story, citing unnamed Obama administration officials, that the United States and Iran have agreed in principle for the first time to one-on-one negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program. Iran reportedly has insisted that its direct talks with Washington should not begin until after the U.S. presidential election on November 6 and wants to broaden the scope of the discussions beyond just the nuclear enrichment issues.

Denials from both sides quickly followed.

“It’s not true that the United States and Iran have agreed to one-on-one talks or any meeting after the American elections,” U.S. National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor said in a statement quoted by Reuters.

Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi denied that any bilateral talks were in the offing. “We don’t have any discussions or negotiations with America,” Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi told a news conference according to Reuters. “The (nuclear) talks are ongoing with the P5+1 group of nations. Other than that, we have no discussions with the United States.”

In fact, an Iranian Revolutionary Guard commander was quoted as bragging that the recent Hezbollah-launched drone into Israeli territory proved that “Zionists (Israelis) and Americans must know that no place is safe for them anymore.”

Could the New York Times story be simply a trial balloon by Obama administration officials to change the subject from Libya?  Although certainly a crass political maneuver, that theory would turn out to be the best scenario.  Of far more concern to the security of the United States and Israel is that there really is a deal – the October surprise that we have all been waiting for – that would trade soften sanctions for some temporary limits on Iran’s further enrichment of uranium.

A former CIA operative inside Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, who goes under the pseudonym Reza Kahlili, wrote in WND that his highly placed source inside the Iranian regime told him that a deal has in fact been struck. Moreover, once Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei receives a letter from President Obama in the next few days guaranteeing the details of the agreement, there will be a public announcement made before the election. All this was reportedly worked out in a secret meeting held in Qatar earlier this month.  None other than Obama’s confidante Valerie Jarrett led the U.S. delegation, according to Kahlili’s Iranian source.

No European countries were reportedly involved in this meeting. Israel, which has the most to lose if the Iranian regime goes for a nuclear weapon despite an agreement with Obama to behave, was left completely in the dark.

Kahlili’s article is far more specific than what the Times reported:

The agreement calls for Iran to announce a temporary halt to partial uranium enrichment after which the U.S. will remove many of its sanctions, including those on the Iranian central bank, no later than by the Iranian New Year in March.

Kahlili’s sources included not only the highly placed Iranian “who remains anonymous for security reasons.” He also claimed verification by French intelligence that “Yukiya Amano, the current director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, has been given the go-ahead by the U.S. to be ready to travel to Iran and announce the agreement.”

The Iranian regime knows that it will have a much easier time dealing with the Obama administration than a new Romney administration.  Thus, it would not be surprising at all if Iran’s Supreme Leader were willing to give Obama the opportunity to boast to voters on the eve of the election that his diplomacy-and-sanctions policy has worked after all.

Kahlili reported that, according to his Iranian source, “the U.S. delegation urged an announcement, even if only on a temporary nuclear deal, before the U.S. elections to help Obama get re-elected.”  The U.S. delegation also reportedly warned the Iranian negotiator that a Romney presidency “would surely move more toward Israel if Iran does not stand by Obama” and that “if Iran does not stand by Obama, Israel will attack Iran.”

WND asked for comment on its report from the State Department and the White House.  It got no response from the State Department and a “no comment” from the White House.

If Kahlili’s report turns out to be true, the implications are staggering. To win re-election, Barack Obama is willing to pull a Neville Chamberlain and announce a nice sounding deal with a totally untrustworthy, ruthless regime just in time for the election. Valerie Jarrett will have taken over high stakes diplomacy for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who just took a bullet for the Obama team in accepting responsibility for the Benghazi security disaster.  Israel has once again been thrown under the bus.  And our European allies, who stuck their necks out with very tough sanctions against Iran, have been excluded from the negotiations.

The Iranian regime has used negotiations as a stalling tactic for years.  Only this time, it is for keeps.  Obama has chased his unconditional negotiations dream for four years, allowing Iran to get closer and closer to achieving its goal of nuclear arms. If Reza Kahlili’s story is true, the Iranian regime will succeed sooner rather than later.

EU parliamentarians to visit Iran despite Israeli pressure to cancel

Saturday, October 20th, 2012

timesofisrael.com

Nine MEPs to head to Tehran days after Europe placed new sanctions on regime

By SAM SER and RON FRIEDMAN October 19, 2012, 5:16 pm

Finnish MEP Tarja Cronber (photo credit: courtesy)

Finnish MEP Tarja Cronber (photo credit: courtesy)

A group of nine European legislators will pay an official visit to Iran later this month despite pressure from Israel to cancel the trip and a EU agreement to place new sanctions on the state’s regime.

The team will be headed by the President of the European Parliament-Iran group, Finland Greens MEP Tarja Cronber.

An unnamed parliament official told AFP there was a “sharp” discussion on whether to go ahead with the visit but that leaders of the parliament’s political groups finally voted to go ahead with it.

The official said that representatives from all but one of the parliamentary groups — the eurosceptic right-wing alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists — would take part in the October 27 visit.

Israel had tried to persuade the legislators to cancel the trip, saying it legitimized the regime in Tehran and claiming Europe was sending Iran mixed messages by conducting dialogue at the same time as it was introducing tougher sanctions to thwart Iran’s nuclear drive.

European Parliament Vice-President Alejo Vidal-Quadras had also called for the cancellation of the MEPs’ trip, telling a conference in Brussels Tuesday that “We in Europe should not send mixed messages to the Iranian regime” and that “any formal delegation from the European Parliament or any national parliament in Europe to Iran will be extremely counterproductive.”

“Whatever good intentions our colleagues may have,” New Europe Online quoted the Spanish MEP Vidal-Quadras as saying, “such visits would give credit to the mullahs and is completely for the benefit of the Iranian regime to justify the repression, violation of human rights and export of fundamentalism and terrorism.”

B’nai B’rith International also objected to the planned trip, with President Allan J. Jacobs saying, “Going over there with the intention of ‘bridge building’ is the exact opposite of what needs to happen. Instead the EU must continue to press Iran to hold its government accountable for efforts to create nuclear weapons.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met Tuesday with European ambassadors to Israel, where he praised the latest EU sanctions while noting that they had not yet prompted Iran to halt its nuclear program.

On Monday, EU foreign ministers meeting in Luxembourg voted to substantially increase sanctions against Tehran, including banning imports of Iranian natural gas and other restrictions on the country’s infrastructure development.

“Iran’s nuclear program is a concern not only to Israel but also to the region and the wider international community,” the EU’s ambassador to Israel, Andrew Standley, told reporters on Tuesday at the meeting.

Also Read:

WND
OBAMA CUTS DEAL WITH IRAN OVER NUKES
By: Reza Kahlili / October 18, 2012

WND
OCTOBER SURPRISE? OBAMA SECRET IRAN DEAL CUT
By: Reza Kahlili / October 04, 2012

A Top Satellite Provider Cuts Off Iran State Broadcaster

Tuesday, October 16th, 2012

10/16/2012

wsj.com

By FARNAZ FASSIHI and PAUL SONNE

One of Europe’s leading satellite providers on Monday said it would terminate its contract with Iran’s broadcast company, IRIB, immediately pulling 19 state-owned television and radio channels off the air.

Viewers in the Middle East, Iran’s main cornerstone of influence, and Europe as well as those inside Iran who accessed the channels through the popular Hotbird satellite no longer have access to the channels.

Eutelsat Communications SA ETL.FR +1.29% said it stopped broadcasting the Iranian channels in light of European sanctions approved in March and a French regulatory decision. The move comes a little over a week after Iran escalated the jamming of Eutelsat satellites to censor broadcasts during recent protests over a plunge in the local currency.

The announcement came as the European Union on Monday approved new sanctions on Iran targeting financial institutions, trade, energy and shipping to urge Tehran to comply with its international obligations on its nuclear program. That was the latest effort by the bloc to bring Iran back to negotiations after a half-year of deadlocked talks. It was not those Monday sanctions that led to Eutelsat’s decision.

It also emerged Monday that the U.S. and the EU are looking to close loopholes in sanctions designed to impede Iran’s oil exports after they discovered that Tehran is secretly using offshore tax havens to help ship its crude.

Though Eutelsat’s decision to remove Iran’s government-owned channels isn’t related to the nuclear standoff, the move serves to isolate the Islamist Republic further.

IRIB condemned the ban, saying it came from political pressure from “U.S. and Zionists” to block the truth about Islamic movements in the Middle East. The broadcaster said that the ban violated freedom of speech and that Iran would pursue legal action. It didn’t say where.

For years, IRIB has rented space on the popular Eutelsat satellite through Arqiva Ltd., a U.K.-based transmission company and middleman. Both companies said Monday they were suspending the Hotbird contract with Iran.

Eutelsat is also planning to remove IRIB from other satellites it owns, a spokeswoman for the French company said, and has notified other transmission companies that rent space to IRIB on Eutelsat satellites apart from Hotbird.

Other Western satellite companies, including Intelsat SA and Telesat Holdings Inc., still carry IRIB’s channels.

In explaining their move, Eutelsat also noted that the EU added IRIB Director Ezzatollah Zarghami to its sanctions list in March. They further said France’s broadcasting regulator recently upheld a 2005 ruling demanding the removal of the IRIB channel Sahar 1 due to anti-Semitic broadcasting.

Iranian human-rights organizations and opposition activists praised Eutelsat’s decision. For years, rights groups have lobbied satellite companies to drop Iran’s government channels, charging that they were propaganda tools of the regime and tools of repression and fear.

“The most important aspect of this decision is to recognize that IRIB is an integral arm of the Iranian intelligence and security services,” said Hadi Ghaemi, the director for the New York-based Iran Campaign for Human Rights. “There was no justification for providing services.”

Iran’s use of Western satellite companies for censorship and jamming of radio and TV frequencies was a subject of a Wall Street Journal investigation in 2011. In a 14-page confidential report viewed by the Journal, IRIB’s research and policy center issued orders to news and talk shows to show President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s government in a favorable light and to make Iran appear to have the upper hand in nuclear talks with the West.

The Islamic Republic openly uses its state media, particularly television and radio, to spread its message and propaganda both domestically and internationally, say human-rights groups. Since the Arab Spring began, Iran has selectively broadcast events in Syria and Egypt to emphasize its interests, rights group say.

Iran has also increasingly jammed satellite transmissions to block local-language Western channels popular with Iranians inside Iran, namely Voice of America’s Persian service and BBC Persian.

Western satellite companies have complained that Iran is violating international telecommunication accords and have issued several warnings.

—Vanessa Mock and Benoît Faucon contributed to this article.

Bad Behavior has blocked 2274 access attempts in the last 7 days.