April 27 2013- Counter-terrorism expert, Reza Khalili, accepted an interview with Alexander Backman where he gave Conciencia Radio his input into the Boston Bombings and how Iran could be related to the attacks. Khalili explained the type of bombs used, how the Tsarnaev brothers were really used as pawns or ‘burned assets’ and that these attacks were planned well in advance. The interview sheds light into the aim and scope that proxy state-sponsored terrorism has on America and the West.
Terrorism
...now browsing by category
BOSTON BOMBINGS UPDATE: REZA KHALILI APRIL 27 2013
Sunday, April 28th, 2013Islamic Republic Officials present “The Wet Gunpowder” award to First Lady Michelle Obama
Wednesday, April 3rd, 2013
As I reported back on March 14, the Islamic regime’s Basij Commander, Brig. Gen Mohammad Reza Naghdi announced that Iran would give the first lady a special award for allegedly exposing a direct link between Hollywood and the White House. He cited her announcement of the “anti-Iran” movie “Argo” Oscar for Best Picture in a live feed from the White House Feb. 24.
“Mrs. Obama’s action was awesome,” Naghdi said with what he described as irony, “and if we had spent billions of dollars, we could not show a link and allegiance between Hollywood and the U.S. government and the White House, especially since they have always denied the allegations.”
Naghdi along with many other officials of the regime have been sanctioned by the U.S., UN and the European Union as a violator of human rights for having participated in the suppression of the Iranian people.
Last Saturday, the regime officials in a ceremonial event (only specific to the regime and its ideology) the 10th conference of “Journey of Enlightened Land” commemorating the “martyrs” of the eight-year war with Iraq unveiled “The Wet Gunpowder” award to be presented to the First Lady:
“The US First Lady presented a so-called artistic award to a film that is clearly anti-Iranian. What does that mean? No artists, even the ones that have Western mindset, believe that Argo is a film worthy of even a national award. That film is definitely not artistic enough to qualify for an international ward; an award that is claimed to be given to the best movie in the world — the Oscar,” Naqdi told the Islamic regime’s Press TV.
“One of the programs that has made this conference more important is giving the Michelle Obama, the First Lady of the United States, the Wet Gunpowder Award. She won the award because she showed the world that the Zionists in the White House have an immense influence and control over the Hollywood film industry,” Said Yaqoub Soleimani, a commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards.
According to the regime’s media, the award was mailed to the Swiss Embassy to be passed on to the First Lady Michelle Obama.
The regime’s media, in an attack on Hollywood, also blasted away at the book “A Time to Betray” which will be made into a TV miniseries about Kahlili’s spying for the CIA in Iran.

The regime’s media, since the production of “Argo,” have attacked Hollywood for what they call the production of “anti-Iran” movies. Citing “unrealistic portrayal” of the Iranian people, they attacked actor George Clooney as one of the two writers of “Argo” and for his producing the “anti-Islam” movie “Syriana.” They also cite the “Zionist company” Warner Brothers for filming “Argo” and the “anti-Iran” movie “300.”
Regime media also point to the upcoming production of a miniseries based on “A Time to Betray” by Kahlili, who in his youth traveled to America to continue his education. Upon his return after the 1979 revolution, he lost hope in the direction of the country, returned to America, hooked up with the CIA and became a spy in the Revolutionary Guards.
This “anti-Iran” miniseries, the regime media said, is to be produced by actor William Baldwin and Warren Kohler.
The regime media published an image of Kahlili alongside former CIA director James Woolsey that mistakenly referred to Woolsey as Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., the former candidate for the Republican Party presidential nomination.
Gerdab.Ir, a Revolutionary Guards media outlet, attacked Kahlili for his call for support of the Iranian people to bring about regime change in Iran.
Also read:
Los Angeles Times
Former CIA spy advocates overthrow of Iranian regime
By: David Zucchino / July 6, 2012
YouTube Brief of Kahlili’s Evidence on Iran’s “Red Line”
Friday, March 29th, 2013
Amb. Henry F. Cooper, Chairman Lt. Gen. Daniel Graham, Founder
High Frontier . . Building Truly Effective Defenses . . Reagan’s Vision Lives!
YouTube Brief of Kahlili’s Evidence on Iran’s “Red Line”
Several recent High Frontier email messages have referred to impressive analyses by Reza Kahlili, which strongly suggests that Iran is very near if not across Binyamin Netanyahu’s Red Line of developing a nuclear weapon. Click here to hear his 2-and-a-half minute briefing on an underground complex of facilities, which appear, from Reza’s Global Earth analysis, to compose key elements for developing and deploying a nuclear armed collection of nuclear-armed ballistic missiles.
Reza Kahlili is the author of the award-winning book “A Time to Betray;” served in CIA Directorate of Operations, as a spy in the Iranian Revolutionary Guard; is a counterterrorism expert; and currently serves on the Task Force on National and Homeland Security, an advisory board to Congress and the advisory board of the Foundation for Democracy in Iran (FDI).
See High Frontier’s webpage (www.highfrontier.org) for links to several of Kahlili’s articles heralding his warnings. In a recent World Net Daily article, found by clicking on its title: “Iran Confirms Secret Nuclear ‘Quds’ Site,” he quotes Dr. Peter Vincent Pry, who was the Executive Director of the congressionally mandated EMP commission and currently leads the its successor Task Force on National and Homeland Security, as below:
High Frontier agrees with Dr. Pry’s assessment of Kahlili’s work and calls for Congress to look into the “story behind the story”—to understand not only what Iran is doing, but also what motivates Iran and what the United States should be doing to counter this threat, especially when coupled with the possibility of an existential EMP event that could lead to the death of hundreds of millions of Americans. This investigation is especially warranted given President Obama’s reassurances that we are a year or so away from crossing Netanyahu’s “Red Line,” and have time for diplomacy to work.
Is this just another “Triumph of hope over experience?”
Please click here to read this week’s update!
How does the administration know that meeting the Iranian threat does not also require more and better missile defenses than currently planned? Especially when taking account of Iranian activities such as recently pointed out by Reza Kahlili, based on his study of Google Earth photography of Iran’s underground facilities and his contacts in the Iranian Revolutionary Guard? What about Reza’s suggestion that Iran Iran has already crossed the “red line” that has so concerned Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu?…
Please help High Frontier continue this important and timely work!
Related Links:
WND
Revealed! Evidence Iran crossed nuclear ‘red line’
By: Reza Kahlili / March 20, 2013
The Washington Times
KAHLILI: Heavy traffic across Iran’s ‘red line’
By: Reza Kahlili / March 21, 2013
The Commentator
Revealed: New Iranian nuclear sites and further evidence of North Korea collaboration
March 21, 2013
PJMedia
[VIDEO] Secret Iranian Nuclear Program Site Has ‘Crossed Every Red Line’
By: BRYAN PRESTON / March 22, 2013
CBN
Thoughts on Obama’s Middle East Visit; Plus, New Iranian Nuke Site Revealed
By: Erick Stakelbeck / March 22, 2013
Powerline
AN UPDATE ON IRAN’S NUCLEAR PROGRAM
By: SCOTT JOHNSON / March 23, 2013
WND
IRAN CONFIRMS SECRET NUCLEAR ‘QUDS’ SITE
By: Reza Kahlili / March 24, 2013
WND
IRAN ACCUSES WND OF PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE
By: Reza Kahlili / March 25, 2013
Al Arabiya
Iran Secret Nuclear Facility (Arabic)
March 25, 2013
Al Arabiya
Iran Secret Nuclear Facility (Farsi)
March 25, 2013
New English Review
Secret Quds Underground Nuclear Development Facility Revealed in Iran
By: Jerry Gordon / March 26, 2013
American Thinker
Experts Concerned Iran Nuclear Progress Is Accelerating
By: Reza Kahlili / April 1, 2013
Gerard Direct
Racing Toward Armageddon – How a Concurrence of Events May Find a Nexus in Global War
Ilana Freedman / April 3, 2013
The Washington Times
KAHLILI: Why nuclear talks with Iran is a fool’s errand
By: Reza Kahlili / April 4, 2013
Iran Working on Nuclear Warheads Out of Secret Site “Quds” (See Video)
Saturday, March 23rd, 2013The Islamic regime’s scientists are working on nuclear warheads – and trying to perfect them – at an underground site “Quds” unknown to the West, according to our source within Iran’s Ministry of Defense, corroborated by other sources in the Ministry of Intelligence.
The source provided the coordinates and chilling details of the regime’s operation out of this site;
The regime has succeeded in not only enriching to weapons grade but has converted the highly enriched uranium into metal,
It has succeeded in making a neutron reflector which indicates the final stages for a nuclear weapons design that would be a two-stage, more sophisticated and much more powerful nuclear bomb,
The site has a capacity of 8,000 centrifuges and currently has three operational chambers with 19 cascades of 170 to 174 centrifuges enriching uranium. As of three months ago, the source said, there were 76 kilograms of 20 percent enriched uranium stock at the site and 48 kilograms of over 40 percent enriched uranium,
It has in its possession 24 kilograms of plutonium, which is sufficient for several atomic bombs and that the scientists are at the last stage of putting together a bomb warhead,
The scientists in their design for a plutonium bomb are using polonium and beryllium, which would serve as the trigger for the bomb,
The regime is working on 17 Shahab 3 missiles in preparation of arming them with nuclear warheads, the source said. The operational and technical aspect of the delivery system is 80 percent completed,
This site has over 380 missile depots and launching pads, facilities that can house large ballistic missiles, most likely Shahab 3 and possibly North Korean Taepodong II (ICBMs),
This facility provides the missiles for Hezbollah and with the help of North Koreans, is mass producing a new generation of napalm bombs to be shipped to the terrorist group while at the same time working on white phosphorus bombs to be used for terrorist acts.
Dr. Peter Vincent Pry, executive director of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security, an expert on nuclear strategy and weapons who served on several strategic congressional commissions and in the CIA, reviewed the imagery and human intelligence (HUMINT) and called for a congressional hearing.
“The newly discovered underground complex looks like the kind of enormous complexes built by the U.S.S.R. during the Cold War and by Russia today,” Pry said. “One can infer from the (HUMINT) descriptions some design characteristics of parts for making implosion plutonium weapons and two-stage atomic weapons,” Pry said. “The latter is a design far more sophisticated than the Hiroshima bomb that could have a much higher yield and possibly produce an explosion 50 times greater than Hiroshima.”
Fritz Ermarth, who served in the CIA and as chairman of the National Intelligence Council, reviewed the imagery. “Taken as a package, this imagery strongly suggests that Iran is working on what we used to call an ‘objective force.’ That is the objective of a deployed force of nuclear weapons on mobile missiles…”
Related Links:
WND
Revealed! Evidence Iran crossed nuclear ‘red line’
By: Reza Kahlili / March 20, 2013
The Washington Times
KAHLILI: Heavy traffic across Iran’s ‘red line’
By: Reza Kahlili / March 21, 2013
The Commentator
Revealed: New Iranian nuclear sites and further evidence of North Korea collaboration
March 21, 2013
PJMedia
[VIDEO] Secret Iranian Nuclear Program Site Has ‘Crossed Every Red Line’
By: BRYAN PRESTON / March 22, 2013
CBN
Thoughts on Obama’s Middle East Visit; Plus, New Iranian Nuke Site Revealed
By: Erick Stakelbeck / March 22, 2013
Powerline
AN UPDATE ON IRAN’S NUCLEAR PROGRAM
By: SCOTT JOHNSON / March 23, 2013
WND
IRAN CONFIRMS SECRET NUCLEAR ‘QUDS’ SITE
By: Reza Kahlili / March 24, 2013
WND
IRAN ACCUSES WND OF PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE
By: Reza Kahlili / March 25, 2013
Al Arabiya
Iran Secret Nuclear Facility (Arabic)
March 25, 2013
Al Arabiya
Iran Secret Nuclear Facility (Farsi)
March 25, 2013
New English Review
Secret Quds Underground Nuclear Development Facility Revealed in Iran
By: Jerry Gordon / March 26, 2013
High Frontier
YouTube Brief of Kahlili’s Evidence on Iran’s “Red Line”
By: Amb. Henry F. Cooper / March 29, 2013
American Thinker
Experts Concerned Iran Nuclear Progress Is Accelerating
By: Reza Kahlili / April 1, 2013
Gerard Direct
Racing Toward Armageddon – How a Concurrence of Events May Find a Nexus in Global War
Ilana Freedman / April 3, 2013
The Washington Times
KAHLILI: Why nuclear talks with Iran is a fool’s errand
By: Reza Kahlili / April 4, 2013
Islamic Regime’s Media Attack Hollywood Over “A Time to Betray”
Monday, March 18th, 2013
Iran media, in an attack on Hollywood, blasted away at the book “A Time to Betray” by Reza Kahlili, which will be made into a TV miniseries about Kahlili’s spying for the CIA in Iran.
Since the release of “Argo,” several Iranian officials have criticized the movie. Regime media reported this week that Iran has hired a French lawyer, Isabelle Coutant-Peyre, to sue the movie’s producers in international court, although the media did not say on what basis.
The regime’s media, since the production of “Argo,” have attacked Hollywood for what they call the production of “anti-Iran” movies. Citing “unrealistic portrayal” of the Iranian people, they attacked actor George Clooney as one of the two writers of “Argo” and for his producing the “anti-Islam” movie “Syriana.” They also cite the “Zionist company” Warner Brothers for filming “Argo” and the “anti-Iran” movie “300.”
Regime media also point to the upcoming production of a miniseries based on “A Time to Betray” by Kahlili, who in his youth traveled to America to continue his education. Upon his return after the 1979 revolution, he lost hope in the direction of the country, returned to America, hooked up with the CIA and became a spy in the Revolutionary Guards.
This “anti-Iran” miniseries, the regime media said, is to be produced by actor William Baldwin and Warren Kohler.
The regime media published an image of Kahlili alongside former CIA director James Woolsey that mistakenly referred to Woolsey as Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., the former candidate for the Republican Party presidential nomination.
Gerdab.Ir, a Revolutionary Guards media outlet, attacked Kahlili for his call for support of the Iranian people to bring about regime change in Iran.
Also read:
Los Angeles Times
Former CIA spy advocates overthrow of Iranian regime
By: David Zucchino / July 6, 2012
How the Media Lied About Fordow
Monday, February 25th, 2013
Fordow fuel enrichment plant – DigitalGlobe image on day of reported explosion, Jan. 21, 2013
The latest IAEA report on Iran’s nuclear program and its activities came out on February 21 and one thing was immediately clear: The last physical inspection of Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FFEP) was between November 17, 2012 and December 3, 2012.
In an exclusive story on WND on January 24 with updates on January 27, 29, 30, 31, February 3, 6,13, 23 and 24, I reported that an explosion had occurred at the Fordow plant in Iran on January 21, which at first trapped 219 workers, including 16 North Koreans, 14 technicians and two military attachés.
Within days after Iran’s denial, and in a coordinated effort, both Reuters and the AP ran stories quoting the IAEA that its inspectors had been at the site after the reported explosion and that the IAEA backed Iran’s denial. This in turn fueled other media to conclude the same thing.
On January 29, Reuters published a report about the IAEA’s email response to an inquiry as to the status of Fordow, which read in part:
“[…]IAEA inspectors regularly visit Iranian nuclear sites, including the one at Fordow, and the U.N. agency suggested in its comment that they had been at the facility after the reports of an explosion there.
“We understand that Iran has denied that there has been an incident at Fordow. This is consistent with our observations,” IAEA spokeswoman Gill Tudor said in an emailed statement in response to a question…”
Later that day the AP ran a similar story:
“The U.N. nuclear agency is dismissing reports of a major explosion at Iran’s fortified underground nuclear facility.
“International Atomic Energy Agency spokeswoman Gill Tudor told the Associated Press on Tuesday that Iran’s denial of “an incident” at the Fordo uranium enrichment plant is ‘consistent with our observations.’ [...]
“A diplomat familiar with the issue told the AP that the IAEA’s information came directly from IAEA inspectors at Fordo. [...]”
It is clear now that both agencies put out incorrect information.
According to the latest IAEA’s report, there are no inspectors stationed at Fordow, and there are no cameras monitoring the site on behalf of the IAEA.

DigitalGlobe image Jan. 21, 2013 – Across from Fordow Plant, written on the mountain in Farsi: “Fadayat Rahbar,” to be sacrificed for the leader – and in smaller print: “Sar Allah,” shedding blood for Allah, or blood for the path of Allah
However, it was not just the media misrepresenting the facts to suppress the report of the explosion at Fordow, the IAEA also is to blame.
When asked by WND, the IAEA spokeswoman, Gill Tudor would not confirm or deny the incident.
“The agency does not evaluate matters in Iran other than those directly relating to its nuclear verification work, so although we’re aware of these media reports, we are not in a position either to confirm or deny them,” Tudor said in an email to WND.
“That said,” she continued, “I’m sure you are aware that agency inspectors regularly visit Iranian nuclear facilities under the IAEA’s safeguards agreement with that country. (You will find more information on the IAEA’s safeguards mandate and activities in Iran at http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/iaeairan/index.shtml.)
“We understand Iran has denied that there has been an incident at Fordow, and this is consistent with our observations,” Tudor said.
However, in a follow-up inquiry by WND to verify if the IAEA had inspected the site since the report of the explosions, Tudor refused to answer.
“I’m very sorry but I can’t go into any further details on ongoing safeguards work, which is conducted with a high level of confidentiality,” she replied.
Again from the official reports by the IAEA on Iran’s nuclear facilities, it is clear that though there are regular visits at Natanz, there are no regular visits to Fordow. The IAEA has to obtain permission from the Iranian counterparts for an arranged and escorted visit.
Even the regime’s Fars News Agency in a report on February 21 (reflecting the recent IAEA report), confessed that the information on the Fordow facility stating that it is still up and running, came directly from Iran itself when it filed the required Design Information Questioner with the IAEA. This is again clear in the February 21 IAEA report reflecting information on the operation of Fordow per the DIQ filed by Iran.
So basically the officials of the Islamic regime ruling Iran denied that an explosion had occurred at their most valuable nuclear site and that denial became a fact for the IAEA to testify that no such an event had taken place. That in turn became the verification for the media to run with their story, which, of course, was more exaggerated to make a good headline.
We have an expression in Iran which goes like this: They asked the fox: Who is your witness? The fox replied, “My tail.”
‘A Time to Betray’ Paperback Makes Its Debut
Tuesday, February 12th, 2013
The paperback edition of “A Time to Betray” hit the market today with a new cover. The book has been optioned for a TV miniseries and more good news will soon be released.
Winner of the 2011 International Book Awards
for Autobiography/Memoir & Best New Non-fiction; Finalist for Nonfiction Narrative
Winner of the National Best Books 2010 Awards
for Nonfiction Narrative; Finalist for Autobiography/Memoir
Chosen as Book of the Month for January 2011
by Magazine of the Marines/Leatherneck
“GENUINELY POWERFUL. . . . A VIVID FIRST-PERSON NARRATIVE.”
—David Ignatius, Washington Post Book World
“A fascinating and crucial window into a world the rest of us cannot access.”
“Astonishing and disturbing. . . . [A] gripping journey.”
—The Free Lance-Star (Fredericksburg, VA)
“So riveting, so moving. . . . I literally couldn’t put it down.”
—Joel C. Rosenberg, New York Times bestselling author of Implosion
“A fascinating and crucial window into a world the rest of us cannot access.”
—World Net Daily
“A spy thriller for the ages. It has the chilling impact of a skillfully written novel. However, the author is not a fictional character. . . .”
—Magazine of the Marines/Leatherneck
“A very important contribution to the understanding of contemporary Iran and the role of intelligence in the struggle against Islamic fundamentalism.”
—Hayden B. Peake, CIA, The Intelligence Officer’s Bookshelf
“Compelling. . . . Thrilling, exciting, and also very disturbing. A very important new book.”
—Milton J. Rosenberg, host of WGN Radio’s “Extension 720”
“Fantastic. . . . The secrets revealed make the reader feel like a fly on the wall. . . . 5 out of 5 stars.”
—The Right Truth Book Club
“Written in a simple yet sincere and touching manner, this book brought tears to my eyes on more than one occasion (not an easy thing to do.) The revelations are interesting and serve as a remainder of the brutal human rights violations committed by the Islamic Regime against the Iranian people.”
—Sayeh Hassan, Canada Free Press
“This is the first inside account by someone so strategically placed. Without embellishing, Khalili manages to convey the horror of Iran’s regime after the downfall of the Shah. Everyone with an interest in the region or in U.S. foreign policy or in real-life espionage will be interested.”
—Marcia L. Sprules, Library Journal
“It’s a compelling read, one that not only talks about the true nature of the Iranian regime but also of the Iranian people, who have now twice tried to free themselves from the yoke of lunatic mullahs trying to destroy the entire world for their dreams of eternal power.”
—Ed Morrissey, Hot Air
“A perfectly crafted memoir. . . . An enthralling portrait of a country impacted by religious and political extremism. What makes A Time to Betray so powerful is two fold: First, the story reads like a John Grisham novel. Second, the narrative is refreshingly objective. Throughout his gripping journey, Kahlili ping-pongs between being a devoted son of Iran and a U.S. supporter.. . . . An astonishing read that will have you rethinking what you know about the Middle East.”
—Nicholas Addison Thomas, The Free Lance-Star (Fredericksburg, VA)
“One of those rare books that grabs you from the very first page—from the very first sentence, in fact—and will not let you go until it is over.”
—Michael Totten
“A Time To Betray is certainly a thriller, with Iranian intelligence always only one step behind Kahlili’s next move. But Kahlili also writes about an idyllic
childhood and illustrates the Iran that disappeared after Ayatollah Khomeini’s revolution.”
—Forbes.com
“Far and away the best book I’ve read this year. . . . I literally couldn’t put it down. It’s a spy story so riveting and a love story so moving that at times I found myself having a hard time breathing, and other times was wiping away tears.”
—Joel C. Rosenberg, New York Times bestselling author of Implosion
“The story Kahlili tells—of the Iranian revolution and how he came to despise it—is genuinely powerful. . . . Indeed, people in the Iranian operations division at the CIA should welcome A Time to Betray as a virtual recruitment poster.”
—David Ignatius, Washington Post Book World
“A beautiful human story.”
—Billy Baldwin, actor/producer
International Media Coverage of the Fordow Explosion Report
Friday, February 8th, 2013
In an exclusive story on WND on Jan. 24, with updates on Jan. 27, 29, 30, 31,Feb. 3, 6, 13 and 23, I reported that an explosion had occurred at the Fordow nuclear facility in Iran destroying much of the installation and trapping over 200 people in the underground facility.
Within days, the international media covered the story. A major German paper, Die Welt, cited sources that confirmed my report. Israeli intelligence also confirmed to the Times of London that such explosion did take place, although they could not tell if it was an act of sabotage or an accident.
However, the officials of the Islamic regime in a brief statement denied the report and White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters: “We have no information to confirm the allegations in the report and we do not believe the report is credible.”
Then in an unusual move, the IAEA issued a brief statement on Jan. 29: “We understand that Iran has denied that there has been an incident at Fordow. This is consistent with our observations.” IAEA spokeswoman, Gill Tudor, emailed that response to reporters. However, when pushed by WND, Tudor could neither confirm nor deny the incident had taken place and would not say whether inspectors had visited the site after the explosions, despite some media reports that it had.
Also according to a high ranking Iranian diplomat serving in Asia, an order from Iran’s Foreign Ministry was issued days after the explosion to all of its embassies that no interviews on Fordow can be given to news agencies and that any response to queries by reporters should refer only to a statement by the White House and a report by news agencies on behalf of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Although no independent confirmation exists so far, the status of Fordow is bound to be found out as the IAEA inspectors will at some point inspect the site. According to the source in the security forces in charge of protecting the site, the regime is desperately trying to clean up the site.
Iran, through its official news agency IRNA, assailed WND as a media outlet “under the direct control of the CIA” and WND’s Reza Kahlili as a tool of the CIA to expand propaganda against the regime in the face of its nuclear progress.
Fordow is central to the regime’s aspiration for nuclear bombs. The advanced centrifuges were moved to the site in order to enrich uranium to the 20 percent level. This raised concerns in the international community because that level of enrichment could be further enriched to weaponization grade within a matter of weeks.
Fordow, which is almost 300 feet deep underground in the belly of a mountain and immune to airstrikes and most bunker buster bombs, has been at the center of the Iranian nuclear dispute. Without Fordo, the regime would feel vulnerable to any airstrike on its other facilities such as Natanz. Also, without Fordow the regime would lose its negotiating powers and, in turn, would lose face at home as it has sacrificed the well-being of millions of its citizens over its nuclear program resulting in severe international sanctions.
Two days after the reported incident at Fordow, the Islamic regime, in a January 23rd letter to the U.N.’s International Atomic Energy Agency (the IAEA), Iran said it plans to install thousands of its upgraded centrifuges at the Natanz facility with the intent to enrich uranium to the 20 percent level. Could this be as a result of the explosion at Fordow where its modern centrifuges were enriching uranium to 20 percent?
It is interesting that last August, a senior Iranian lawmaker said Iran’s nuclear scientists and experts had managed to thwart enemies’ plots to infiltrate and blow up the Fordow uranium enrichment facility.
“The enemies intended to repeat a Chernobyl-like disaster through selling (booby-trapped) equipment and blowing up the centrifuges at the Fordow site, but their plot was discovered and foiled by the Iranian scientists’ wisdom and tact,” Abbas-Ali Mansouri, member of the Iranian Majlis (parliament) National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, as quoted by Fars.
In relevant remarks quoted by Fars, the head of Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI), Fereidoon Abbasi, also said that, “Separate attacks on Iran’s centrifuges — through tiny explosives meant to disable key parts of the machines — were discovered before the blasts could go off on timers.”
One thing is for sure: The fact that this news I have reported is getting such a reaction — from confirmation to denial, and with such broad coverage and at such levels — speaks volumes.
Original reports:
WND
SABOTAGE! KEY IRANIAN NUCLEAR FACILITY HIT?
By: Reza Kahlili / January 24, 2013
WND
WND report blows Iran nuke program wide open
By: Reza Kahlili / January 27, 2013
WND
NEW DETAILS SURFACE ON IRAN NUCLEAR EXPLOSION
By: Reza Kahlili / January 29, 2013
WND
U.N. WON’T DENY EXPLOSIONS AT IRAN NUKE PLANT
By: Reza Kahlili / January 30, 2013
WND
‘PANICKED’ IRAN MAKES POWER MOVE AFTER NUKE-SITE LOSS
By: Reza Kahlili / January 31, 2013
WND
NORTH KOREANS AMONG 40 DEAD AT IRAN NUKE PLANT
By: Reza Kahlili / February 03, 2013
WND
IRAN DIPLOMAT, FOREIGN INTEL CONFIRM FORDOW BLASTS
By: Reza Kahlili / February 06, 2013
WND
IRAN: U.N. NUKE INSPECTORS ARE SPIES
By: Reza Kahlili / February 13, 2013
WND
IRAN’S NUKE-PLANT EXPLOSION COVER-UP
By: Reza Kahlili / February 23, 2013
International Media coverage:
Die Welt
Fog Over Fordo
By: Michael Sturmer / January 30, 2013
The Algemeiner
WND Adds to Report on Explosion at Fordow Nuclear Plant as Former Revolutionary Guard Member Confirms Incident to Israeli Media
January 29, 2013
Ynet News
Fordo said to be crippled by ‘blast’
January 29, 2013
The Australian
‘Blast’ at Iranian nuclear facility
January 29, 2013
The Inquisitr
Devastating Explosion At Key Iranian Nuclear Facility Confirmed By London Times
January 29, 2013
Reuters
U.N. nuclear watchdog backs Iran’s denial of Fordow blast
January 29, 2013
The Daily Beast
White House Debunks Iran Nuclear Explosion, But Iran Denies Planting Story
By: Dan Ephron / January 29, 2013
MSNBC
Iranian exile reported alleged blast, and Israeli official confirmed
January 29, 2013
The Hill
Report of explosion at Iran nuclear plant not ‘credible,’ says Carney
By: Justin Sink / January 28, 2013
Jerusalem Post
Ya’alon: ‘I read about Iran blast in the paper’
January 28, 2013
Jerusalem Post
Report: Israelis confirm explosion at Fordow facility
January 28, 2013
International Business Times
Iran Denies Blast At Nuclear Plant, Israel Insists It Happened, But Denies Involvement
By: Maya Shwayder / January 28, 2013
The Algemeiner
Conflicting Reports Over Explosion at Iranian Fordow Nuclear Facility
January 28, 2013
The Weekly Standard
Israel Shores Up Its Defenses, While Iran Remains Quiet
By: Lee Smith / January 28, 2013
Israel National News
Israeli Source Confirms Iran’s Fordow Nuclear Plant Exploded
By: Chana Ya’ar / January 28, 2013
Missing Peace.EU
Iranian expert confirms blast in Fordow uranium enrichment facility
January 28, 2013
The Telegraph
Is Iran’s mystery nuclear explosion too good to be true?
By: Con Coughlin / January 28, 2013
Reuters
US does not believe media reports about blast at Iranian enrichment plant
January 28, 2013
Pravada
Iran denies explosion at nuclear facility, Israel confirms it
January 28, 2013
Breitbart
CONFIRMED? MASSIVE EXPLOSION AT IRAN NUCLEAR FACILITY
By: JOEL B. POLLAK / January 28, 2013
Business Insider
Massive Explosion Reported At Iran’s Fordow Nuclear Facility
By: Robert Johnson / January 28, 2013
Times of London
Iranian uranium-enriching facility ‘is damaged by explosion’
By: Sheera Frenkel Tel Aviv, January 28 2013
The Times of Israel
Israeli sources confirm blast at Iranian nuclear facility
By YOEL GOLDMAN, January 28 2013
Policymic
Fordow Nuclear Explosion Shows War With Iran Has Already Started
Bryant Harris / January 28, 2013
Ynet News
Report: Israeli officials ‘confirm’ blast in Fordo
January 28, 2013
Jerusalem Post
Report of blast at Iran nuke facility unconfirmed
By YAAKOV LAPPIN, January 28, 2013
Haaretz
Who spread reports of an ‘explosion’ at Iran’s Fordow nuclear plant and why?
By: Anshel Pfeffer / January 28, 2013
Irish Times
Israeli minister welcomes reports of blast at nuclear plant
By: MARK WEISS, in Jerusalem – January 28, 2013
Die Welt
Expert reports severe explosion at nuclear plant
By Clemens Wergin, January 27, 2013
Spiegel
Iran: Rumors of explosion at nuclear plant important
January 27, 2013
The Times of Israel
Israeli minister welcomes report of huge blast at Iran nuclear plant
January 27, 2013
Israel Today
Reports: Iran nuclear facility destroyed
January 27, 2013
UPI
Report says blast in Iranian nuke site
Jan. 27, 2013
GLOBES
Huge explosion reported at Iran nuclear site
January 27, 2013
New English Review
Was Israel Behind the Rumored Fordow Nuclear Enrichment Explosion in Iran?
By: Jerry Gordon / January 25, 2013
Life under the Shah, the revolution, the mullahs and new revelations on Iran’s Nuclear Program
Thursday, December 27th, 2012A webinar with featured guest Reza Kahlili on Iran; life under the Shah, the revolution, the promises of Khomeini and the suppression of the Iranian people. Also new revelations on Iran’s nuclear program.
Kahlili is a pseudonym for a former CIA operative in Iran’s Revolutionary Guards. Khalili worked for the CIA in the 1980s and ’90s and is the author of the award-winning book, A Time to Betray. He currently serves on the Task Force on National and Homeland Security and the advisory board of the Foundation for Democracy in Iran.
Kahlili has contacts inside Iran’s revolutionary guards to this day. In the webinar, Kahlili presents an overview of the Iranian Islamic regime’s ideology as well as the latest information on the status on Iran’s program to develop nuclear weapons.
Another Sad Story from Iran
Wednesday, November 7th, 2012It is reported that Sattar Beheshti, a 35 year old worker, who was arrested for his civil right activities on Facebook, has been killed under torture by the Islamic regime ruling Iran.

Only one week after his arrest by Iran’s cyber police, labour activist Sattar Beheshti has died as a result of torture at the hands of his captors, according to Kaleme, a media outlet close to Green Movement leader Mir Hossein Mousavi.
“According to eyewitnesses who had spoken to family members held at Evin Prison, Beheshti had been severely beaten and tortured while under interrogation. Bruises and torture marks were noticeable on the political prisoner’s body, face and head,” Kaleme reported.
Here is the link to VOA interview (in Farsi) with Sattar Beheshti’s sister talking about her brother’s being murdered by regime : http://youtu.be/bexadDtqQoI
This is while reports indicate that just last month more than 30 people were executed, some publicly hanged, on the charge of drug possession. The regime often executes political prisoners on bogus drug possession charges, in order to avoid further pressure by the world community.
Recently nine female political prisoners began a hunger strike to protest the conditions in the prison. Maryam Hosseinkhah writing for RadioZamaneh does an excellent job in showing the pain and suffering of those behind bars in Iran:
Hunger strike in the women’s ward & empty frame of Raheleh Zokayi
By Maryam Hosseinkhah

Nine female political prisoners began a hunger strike on October 31, 2012, to protest the “insulting” treatment they suffered at the hands of their guards at Evin Prison in Tehran. In all the photos and posters that have been published regarding the news about these women, only eight of them are pictured.
The ninth prisoner cannot be seen in any of these pictures, and searching the internet does not yield any images of her. In some reports, she is referred to as: “The Unknown Prisoner.”
On the two posters circulating among social networking sites, alongside the frames holding the faces of the other eight women, an empty frame can be seen with the name Raheleh Zokayi beneath.
Thursday November 22, 2007 – Evin Prison, Oblivion Ward
I met Raheleh Zokayi for the first time five years ago, when I was arrested for my activity with women’s rights defenders. It was the birthday of a prisoner in the financial offences section, and her cellmates had organized a surprise party with two tarts put aside for them by Shahla Jahed1 and 22 cheese sticks pressed into the tarts as candles. The room was one of the smallest in the ward, but more than 20 people were there that night. The washbasin was turned into a drum, and the girl who had been arrested the previous night was singing. Every once in while someone would go to the centre of the room and take a few dance steps and then, suddenly, as if the weight of the prison walls was crushing down on everybody and they would all fall silent.
I saw Raheleh there for the first time, with her short straight hair, pale face and big dark eyes. Her arms were covered with needle marks and tattoos.
The birthday party ended with the guard’s reprimand as the lights were turned off. Raheleh approached me and pointed to the book I was holding: “Hey sis, let’s have a look at your book!”
I asked: “You like poetry? It is Forough Farokhzad, the young poetess who died young in an accident.”
She took it in her hands and began reciting “Another birth” from memory:
A dark and chanted verse is what I am
Forever bearing you
In myself imbued with you
Forth to the morning of eternal burgeonings and blooms
Forough’s book was the only thing I had sneaked into prison. Raheleh also loved Forough and knew many of her poems by heart. We became friends that very night. As the women began to return to their cells one by one, we sat side by side under the dim light of the corridor, relating the stories of our lives.
She was 24, and I had heard that she was in for “armed robbery.” She said her uncles would carry out armed robberies and, since she was 11, she had to accompany them as a cover to throw off suspicion.
At 13, she was married off to one of the gang leaders at the Iran-Pakistan border region. He was violent and rough and had made Raheleh hate and fear all men. Her husband was killed a few years later in a shoot-out and left her with a son. At the time of her arrest, he was one year old. After the death of her husband, she had returned to her father’s home and once again had to accompany her uncles on their armed heists.
Once when she was telling me that story, I asked: “Couldn’t you have refused and run away?”
With a bitter smile she answered: “They would have cut off my head. Run away…what about my son?”

Raheleh Zokayi was arrested in 2002 at the age of 19 for the charge of “participating in armed robbery” and was sentenced to four years in jail. Later, when drugs were found in her cellmate’s belongings, she took responsibility for possessing some it in order to save her friend from hanging. The sacrifice added another 10 years to her sentence. She said, however, that she did it for the sake of friendship: “Friendship has a price!” Raheleh paid the heavy price, but the price turned out to be even heavier when her cellmate was once again found in possession of crack and ended up being executed.
Later, Raheleh herself resorted to drugs in order to relieve some of the pain, or, as she put it: “When you’re full of pain, when you have no way out, and drugs can be in your hand in a blink of an eye, it is the easiest way to bear the misery.”
When I saw her, she had just given it up. She said it was a tough struggle but she had done it for the sake of her son and for Asal. Asal was her five-year-old niece from a sister whose husband had been executed, after being arrested on charges similar to Raheleh’s. Her sister had then committed suicide. So Asal and Raheleh’s seven-year-old son were now living with Raheleh’s 20-year-old sister, who was also looking after their 11-year-old twin brother and sister.
Raheleh didn’t say much about her son. More than missing him, she was concerned that he had reached school age and lacked the birth certificate needed to register in school, and there was no one to face the bureaucracy for him. Her 20-year-old sister had enough on her plate taking care of four children, let alone coming all the way from Mashhad to visit her or chasing down her son’s paperwork.
Raheleh had spent all of these years without any visits. At Evin Prison, having visits is not just a matter of seeing relatives and relieving some of the pain of separation. More significantly, having visitors means getting some cash to be able to buy some of the basic necessities of life inside prison. While all prisoners get three meals a day, the meals are so low in nutritional content that those prisoners who rely only on prison meals for nutrition and have no money to buy some milk or fruit will soon perish.
Prisoners who have no visitors will usually try to make money doing odd jobs for other prisoners such as washing dishes or clothes or standing in the long line-ups to buy fruit, dairy or tuna. Instead, Raheleh would go to the doll workshop. It was more work, but Raheleh preferred the workshop because it was some time away from the ward. Drugs were easily available in the prison ward, and she was afraid of getting caught up in it once more, so the doll workshop was a kind of refuge for her. She earned 100,000 rials a month for working from dawn till dusk everyday, and in the evening she would go to the library to get a book for her sleepless nights. She said she had read the Harry Potter novels at the library four times and was dying to read the next installment and see the films.
She was young, very young. If you ignored the tattoos and needle marks on her arms, she wouldn’t even seem 24. Her eyes were full of life before she relapsed into drug abuse.
One night, when she asked me why I was in jail, I told her about the One Million Signatures Campaign to End Discriminatory Laws and the women who were struggling on the other side of the prison walls to change the laws and attain some degree of justice. She listened carefully, and later I heard she was telling other women about the campaign and the struggle for women’s rights. On the day when Parliament approved equal inheritance rights for husband and wife, I was still in jail. I had just returned from an interrogation session when I heard women cheering and applauding in the lower ward, and later I saw Raheleh running up the stairs, saying she had good news.
She told me with childlike excitement: “It’s on the news; they are going to fix the inheritance laws to give husbands and wives equal rights. I was just telling my cellmates about the campaign and they were all telling me, ‘Get out of here! These laws can’t be changed.’ And then we suddenly hear this on the news and we all cheered.”
Then, with a kind of hope I had never seen in her eyes before, she asked: “By the way, sis; do you have one of those petitions for us to sign?”
She had begun studying and kept saying that she wanted to get rid of the tattoos on her arms. She had heard that some prisoners may be pardoned and she was caught up in the fever of getting out. She wanted to get her diploma, as she had only gone to school as far as seventh grade, then studied up to tenth grade at nights on her own and passed the exams. She wanted to get a job and take charge of her son and niece and twin brother and sister. She said Asal was only five but she was a handful, and her sister could not handle her, so her husband had sent her to live with her uncles. Raheleh was afraid that she too would be taken on their heists and would fall into drug abuse.
Then she would suddenly break off from these musings and say: “These are all just a bunch of useless fantasies. In 10 years, when I get out, I’ll be a 34-year-old illiterate and unemployed woman who cannot even feed her 16-year-old son. That’s, of course, if he can even remember me then.”
“Well, this is my lot. I shouldn’t think of it too much. I am used to prison. I have almost forgotten how it is out there. I don’t even know what to do if I get out.”
A few weeks later, the authorities began separating prisoners based on their offences, so Raheleh was moved from the financial offences ward, which was relatively safe and had less overt drug use, to the ward specifically for drug offenders, where drugs were to be openly found in all the cells and most of the 35 prisoners in each room were addicted.
Raheleh and her friends protested against the move, saying she had been clean and a return would make her very prone to a relapse; the authorities did not listen. Within two weeks, Raheleh fell back into her old habit. She had lost all hope and had no strength to fight it anymore.
I couldn’t see her much after that, and the few times I did, her eyes had lost their little rays of hope. She did not care for books anymore and was mostly drowsy. Once when I gathered all my determination to talk to her, she looked at me demoralized, saying: “What could I change? You know what it means to be here for eight years? Do you know that even when I get out I have to return to the same house and go back to robbery and smuggling? A lonely addicted woman with no education or skill, even if she is released..what’s she gonna do? With a young boy who god knows how old he’s gonna be then…”
She said these things and got going. I didn’t see her again until the day I was released. She did not look well. She had shaved her eyebrows but her eyes had regained some hope. I heard she had once again stopped using drugs. She was studying again and had even started painting. I heard this from others who served time later. The last I heard, she was transferred to a prison in a small provincial town, and then I never heard from her again.
.
She was, however, always on my mind; maybe because she was the same age as my sister. I always wondered if she could turn her life around with all those natural aptitudes and zest for life. Maybe it was our shared love for Forough… or knowing her dreams… I don’t know.
The last time I saw her, I gave her my copy of Forough’s poetry and wrote in it: “For days that may be brighter and free”; she whispered: “Perhaps…”
September 15, 2012: Dublin
It was September, and the Dublin sun was still strong enough to allow breakfast on the balcony. I was eating with a friend whose sister had been recently released from prison, and she was telling me recent tales from the political ward of Evin Prison.
Her sister had told her especially about a girl who had been given a death sentence. She had told her that the girl was in love with Forough and wanted to learn English; that she had no visitors and was funny and decent.
I thought of Raheleh. I said I also had met someone in the general ward who was like that, and soon she told me that she was called Raheleh.
I thought: had Raheleh been given the death sentence? Raheleh who was lost and anonymous behind prison walls? The more she told me, the more I was sure that it was the same Raheleh. She had been sentenced to death, and no one had heard about it. I heard that she had gone on a hunger strike in protest against the unreasonable sentence they had handed her. I heard she had sewn her lips together, and no one had even heard of it.
She said: “In the first days after the 2009 election protests, political prisoners in Evin Prison were first being taken to the general ward, and Raheleh had helped some of them circumvent their restrictions on getting phone calls, and the prison authorities had used this as an excuse to slap her with a death sentence. They had accused her of links to the People’s Mojahedin Organization and charged her with enmity against God.”
Her hunger strike had forced them to reconsider the sentence, and they reduced it to an additional one-year jail term, which landed her in the political ward of Evin Prison. I emailed a few people in Iran; no one had heard of Raheleh and did not know that she had almost been executed.
Now, after months of no news, Raheleh Zokayi’s name appears alongside those of the other eight women in the political ward of Evin Prison who are refusing food. But she remains the “unknown prisoner” whom no one has heard of. No one knows what she is in jail for or where she came from, and there are no pictures of her.
Raheleh is not a prominent human rights activist or journalist or political or social activist, nor does she have a family to be her voice on the outside.
Her vacant frame is being passed around in the poster of the women on hunger strike, and sometimes even the empty frame is omitted. She is perhaps the symbol of all the men and women who now and for many years before have been incarcerated, tried or even executed without anyone seeing their picture or hearing their voice.
Men and women who have suffered alongside others but with voices never heard, only to become another cipher in the endless procession of prisoners and the executed of these past years.
1- Shahla Jahed was an Iranian woman jailed in 2004 accused of murder of her boyfriend’s wife. Human rights organizations campaigned to have her death sentence commuted and insisted that she did not get a fair trial. She was executed in December of 2010.
U.S.-Iran talks report may impact Presidential debate
Monday, October 22nd, 2012U.S.-Iran talks report may impact Monday debate
10/21/2012

On the eve of the last presidential debate – focusing, of course, on foreign policy – the White House is flat-out denying there are any plans for one-on-one talks between the U.S. and Iran on its uranium enrichment program.
The topic is sure to generate fireworks at Monday’s final debate. Is there a secret deal on the table or not?
Reza Kahlili, a pseudonym for a former CIA operative in Iran’s Revolutionary Guards and author of the award-winning book “A Time to Betray,” has been reporting for WND that Obama administration officials have already cut a deal with Iran that would end many of the sanctions against the Islamic Republic in exchange for the promise of a temporary halt to uranium enrichment.
Also Read:
WND
IT’S OFFICIAL! IRAN FULFILLS OBAMA SURPRISE
By: Reza Kahlili / November 03, 2012
The Washington Times
KAHLILI: Obama’s re-election deal with Iran
By: Reza Kahlili / October 30, 2012
WND
SECRET U.S., IRANIAN MEETINGS TO CONTINUE
By: Reza Kahlili / October 28, 2012
WND
CLANDESTINE OBAMA-IRAN MEETINGS STIR DENIAL
By: Reza Kahlili / October 24, 2012
WND
IRAN SECRET-DEAL REPORT UPSETS AYATOLLAH, OBAMA
By: Reza Kahlili / October 23, 2012
WND
OBAMA CUTS DEAL WITH IRAN OVER NUKES
By: Reza Kahlili / October 19, 2012
WND
OCTOBER SURPRISE? OBAMA SECRET IRAN DEAL CUT
By: Reza Kahlili / October 04, 2012
The Daily Caller
Obama, Iran in secret nuclear deal
By: Reza Kahlili / February 27, 2012
***
The Islamic regime’s media coverage on this story:
Keyhan (Monday OCT 29)- Keyhan (Wednesday OCT 31) - Keyhan (Sunday NOV 04) – Mashregh - Farhikhtegan - Fararu - IRdiplomacy - Ebetekar News - Khabar Online - Tabnak - Inn IR
Opposition Site: Kaleme - Kaleme (Thursday NOV 01)
Also: BBC Farsi
***
AL ARABIYA
Iran open to negotiations with America ‘even in hell:’ top official
By MASOUD AL-ZAHID / November 08, 2012
ParamusPost
It’s Official! Iran Fulfills Obama Surprise
November 05, 2012
New English Review
Kahlili: Iran’s Supreme Leader Continues Secret Discussions
By: Jerry Gordon / October 30, 2012
Renew America
Part 12 – 2012: America’s last free election?
Behind the Iranian “October surprise”: attack on the U.S. homeland?
By: Wes Vernon / October 25, 2012
The Record
Dick Morris: An election year deal with Iran
By: Dick Morris / October 23, 2012
WND
IRAN NUKE EXPOSÉ SEEN ‘DERAILING’ OBAMA CAMPAIGN
October 23, 2012
Israel National News
US-Iran Secret Nuclear Deal tied to US Elections
By: Dr. Joe Tuzara / October 22, 2012
Dick Morris.com
Iran Deal: The October Surprise?
By Dick Morris on October 22, 2012
Frontpagemag
October Surprise: Direct Talks with Iran?
By: Joseph Klein / October 22, 2012
Frontpagemag
Did Obama Cut a Nuke Deal with Iran?
By: Daniel Greenfield / October 21, 2012
WND
U.S.-IRAN NUKE TALKS: ON OR OFF?
October 20, 2012
PJMedia
The October Surprise
By: Michael Ledeen / October 20, 2012
NY Times
U.S. Officials Say Iran Has Agreed to Nuclear Talks
By HELENE COOPER and MARK LANDLER / October 20, 2012
WND
ADMINISTRATION: IRAN HAS AGREED TO NUCLEAR TALKS
October 20, 2012
PipeLineNews.org
BREAKING – Obama Springs His Iran Nuke Negotiations October Surprise As Predicted
By WILLIAM MAYER / October 20, 2012
New English Review
New York Times Confirms Obama Iran Nuke Deal October Surprise
By: Jerry Gordon / October 20, 2012
The Washington Times
Dick Morris predicts an Obama-Iran ‘October surprise’
By: David Eldridge / October 20, 2012
New English Review
Obama’s October Surprise Nuke Deal with Iran Emerges
By: Jerry Gordon / October 19, 2012
PipeLineNews.org
Is Team Obama Secretly Negotiating With Iran In Ploy To Influence Election?
By WILLIAM MAYER / October 15, 2012
Northern Colorado Gazette
Could Obama, Iran make secret deal prior to election?
by: Matt Lacy / October 14, 2012
WND
IRAN FLOATS IDEA OF DEAL AS SANCTIONS TIGHTEN
BY: F. MICHAEL MALOOF / October 14, 2012
Iran Protests and The Way Forward
Wednesday, October 3rd, 2012In my article “U.S. must actively work for regime change in Iran” published in the Christian Science Monitor on September 12th, I revealed that the Iranian Intelligence Ministry had warned the officials of the possibility of riots due to the devaluation of the Iranian currency and the increasing inflation because of the recent sanctions against the Iranian Central Bank and the Iranian oil industry.
I suggested a path forward showing how the West could support the Iranians change from within this time around. This could help solve the Iranian nuclear problem without having to go to war.
Today riots are taking place in Tehran’s Bazaar to protest against the devaluation of the Iranian currency and the dire economic situation in the country. People are under immense economical pressure. In 2009, it was students and activists who dared to come out and demonstrate against the Islamic regime, which the majority resented. Now they are joined by the hungry masses from around the country.
This is an opportunity for the West to assist with a regime change in Iran, which would not only benefit the Iranian people, but the entire region and the world.
Without the Islamic regime,a moderate Iran would help stabilize the Middle East, weaken Hezbollah in Lebanon, Assad in Syria, Taliban in Afghanistan and would halt the spread of terrorism around the world.
The Iranian people are some of the most Westernized in the region. Tens of thousands have given their lives to the cause of freedom and democracy. If we fail to help and support them this time, the radicals will get the bomb, will use the bomb, and humanity will see the greatest destruction and depression in its history.
A nuclear exchange in the Persian Gulf will stop all oil flow from that region and collapse the global economy. This will create chaos, havoc and provide the exact environment which the fanatics ruling Iran believe will accommodate the coming of Shiite’s twelfth Imam, “Mahdi,” who in their belief will then conquer the world and raise the flag of Islam across the globe. This, in effect, will create the Caliphate they are working toward.
I also believe that due to the current environment in the Middle East and the situation with the global economy, it is highly unlikely that America and the European Union will have the stomach for a conflict with Iran. Russia and China, Iran’s long term allies, have already objected to any action in response to Iran’s pursuit of the bomb, suggesting that the only viable solution is through negotiations.
Although a nuclear-armed Iran is an existential threat to Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu fully knows the consequences if Israel goes at it alone.
Any attack on Iran by any entity, if not combined with a goal of regime change, will prove unfruitful. Hence the importance of getting the people of Iran informed and involved in a movement for regime change.
Today, it is imperative that we provide secure communications to the Iranian people so that information can be sent to them to help them get united and ready. They need to know that the West will stand by them and their aspirations for freedom.
Action Needed:
1= Start a HD radio program into Iran
Taken into consideration that the majority of Iranians get their news from the state-run media which is directly controlled by radicals ruling Iran and that the Internet communication is under the ultimate control of the Islamic Republic, it is of utmost importance to provide Iranians with a channel of information which is less likely to be blocked by the regime and which provides less of a risk to Iranians to access.
2= Provide secured communication to the Iranians.
- Provide technological tools to Iranian opposition which will allow them to independently unite every segment of Iranian society in their pursuit of a better life.
- Utilize those tools to overcome current communications restrictions by the Iranian government including oppressive monitoring and imprisonment.
- Enable free exchange of information on threats of Iranian leadership, and empower the opposition to independently guide the populace for a peaceful transition to full democracy.
3= Promotion of civil rights in Iran.
4= Promotion of civil disobedience, peaceful protests and national strikes.
5= Taking the Iranian leaders to International courts for crimes against humanity.
6= Promoting defection of the current officers in the regime.
Many within the regime are ready and willing to defect and provide valuable information. However there is no one certain channel that they can rely on or trust, we need to establish that channel and help the defectors with a safe passage to a secure location. Every defection will widen the current existing crack within the regime and will help with the fall from within.
7= Formation of a temporary government in Exile.
8= Openly supporting the aspirations of the Iranian people for freedom and democracy.
Videos of the protests today:
Anti-regime bazaar protest, “If you have dignity then close your shops”
“Stop supporting Assad, Do something to support us”
Security forces attempt to control strike in Tehran bazaar
“Death to this government”
Anti-regime protest in Tehran “Death to Dictator”







